<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An Email Exchange</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neptunuslex.com/2005/09/15/an-email-exchange/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2005/09/15/an-email-exchange/</link>
	<description>The unbearable lightness of Lex. Enjoy!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:43:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: bc</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2005/09/15/an-email-exchange/comment-page-1/#comment-178</link>
		<dc:creator>bc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2005 17:51:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/?p=35#comment-178</guid>
		<description>Lex,

Write the book. You CAN do it.

bc</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lex,</p>
<p>Write the book. You CAN do it.</p>
<p>bc</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lex</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2005/09/15/an-email-exchange/comment-page-1/#comment-167</link>
		<dc:creator>lex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2005 01:39:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/?p=35#comment-167</guid>
		<description>Kind words again, Phil, head of the class :-)

I &lt;em&gt;did&lt;/em&gt; actually look into writing a book once, about a dozen years, subsequent to a rather nasty spill on my motorcycle, and awarded 30 days of convalescent leave. Nothing but time on my hands, and being who I am, I first bought a book on how to write a book (short version: Write - Long version: Write, and die trying to find a publisher) and went merrily to work.

Before discovering that it&#039;s actually rather hard. Damn hard, actually. Fun thing about the blog though is that I get to practice writing, while both of you useful readers end up being my editors &lt;em&gt;and&lt;/em&gt; market survey! 

For free!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kind words again, Phil, head of the class <img src='http://www.neptunuslex.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I <em>did</em> actually look into writing a book once, about a dozen years, subsequent to a rather nasty spill on my motorcycle, and awarded 30 days of convalescent leave. Nothing but time on my hands, and being who I am, I first bought a book on how to write a book (short version: Write &#8211; Long version: Write, and die trying to find a publisher) and went merrily to work.</p>
<p>Before discovering that it&#8217;s actually rather hard. Damn hard, actually. Fun thing about the blog though is that I get to practice writing, while both of you useful readers end up being my editors <em>and</em> market survey! </p>
<p>For free!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2005/09/15/an-email-exchange/comment-page-1/#comment-164</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2005 00:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/?p=35#comment-164</guid>
		<description>Enjoyed most of it? No, I think maybe I enjoyed all of it. Some stuff more than others is all. I check the site every day for new content just like your other loyal reader :-) Ever think of writing a novel ala Tom Clancy? Think you might have the right stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Enjoyed most of it? No, I think maybe I enjoyed all of it. Some stuff more than others is all. I check the site every day for new content just like your other loyal reader <img src='http://www.neptunuslex.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  Ever think of writing a novel ala Tom Clancy? Think you might have the right stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lex</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2005/09/15/an-email-exchange/comment-page-1/#comment-162</link>
		<dc:creator>lex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2005 21:25:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/?p=35#comment-162</guid>
		<description>Bill - I suspect you&#039;re right in a lot of ways: Rotary-wing combat is more &lt;em&gt;personal&lt;/em&gt; than fixed-wing. But I think it&#039;s also generally (although not by any means always) more reactive as well. Fixed wing strikes (apart from CAS and maybe BAI or TST) tend to be more deliberative from planning through execution - you get to know your target&#039;s every feature intimately before ever you see it in the cross-hairs.

B2 - I guess the parallel my occasional correspondent and I are evoking has less to do with the moment of destruction than with the act leading up to it. It is a passion for destruction in other words, rather than a destructive passion.

Thanks for writing, IJ and Jim - pleased to have been of service :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill &#8211; I suspect you&#8217;re right in a lot of ways: Rotary-wing combat is more <em>personal</em> than fixed-wing. But I think it&#8217;s also generally (although not by any means always) more reactive as well. Fixed wing strikes (apart from CAS and maybe BAI or TST) tend to be more deliberative from planning through execution &#8211; you get to know your target&#8217;s every feature intimately before ever you see it in the cross-hairs.</p>
<p>B2 &#8211; I guess the parallel my occasional correspondent and I are evoking has less to do with the moment of destruction than with the act leading up to it. It is a passion for destruction in other words, rather than a destructive passion.</p>
<p>Thanks for writing, IJ and Jim &#8211; pleased to have been of service <img src='http://www.neptunuslex.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimthepilot</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2005/09/15/an-email-exchange/comment-page-1/#comment-161</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimthepilot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2005 19:16:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/?p=35#comment-161</guid>
		<description>Good stuff. Take a read through G.K. Chesterton&#039;s &quot;The Last Hero&quot; for another warrior who knew what it is to love the target to death.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good stuff. Take a read through G.K. Chesterton&#8217;s &#8220;The Last Hero&#8221; for another warrior who knew what it is to love the target to death.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: badbob</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2005/09/15/an-email-exchange/comment-page-1/#comment-160</link>
		<dc:creator>badbob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2005 19:05:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/?p=35#comment-160</guid>
		<description>scratch, scratch....I dunno

re- &quot;Eros when combined with phileo can perhaps make a dialetic synthesis which reaches to the god-like plain of agape, but by itself eros is ignoble and destructive.&quot;

There are no stupid questions, right? But..

Are you making an art out of a science (ballistics) or vice versa? Or are you explaining &quot;be the bull&quot;, &quot;may the force be with you&quot; or &quot;pause-pickle-pull&quot;? Is it that split second as the swinging muzzle reaches the dove?

Which is all sort of funny when you consider that the entire JDAM link to do the above is comprised of SW code written to spec by bespeckled EE&#039;s and CS grads! Digital and clinical! Hard to get target fixation w/JDAM I&#039;ll reckon.

B2</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>scratch, scratch&#8230;.I dunno</p>
<p>re- &#8220;Eros when combined with phileo can perhaps make a dialetic synthesis which reaches to the god-like plain of agape, but by itself eros is ignoble and destructive.&#8221;</p>
<p>There are no stupid questions, right? But..</p>
<p>Are you making an art out of a science (ballistics) or vice versa? Or are you explaining &#8220;be the bull&#8221;, &#8220;may the force be with you&#8221; or &#8220;pause-pickle-pull&#8221;? Is it that split second as the swinging muzzle reaches the dove?</p>
<p>Which is all sort of funny when you consider that the entire JDAM link to do the above is comprised of SW code written to spec by bespeckled EE&#8217;s and CS grads! Digital and clinical! Hard to get target fixation w/JDAM I&#8217;ll reckon.</p>
<p>B2</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

