<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Might be we&#8217;re circling in on the core of the problem&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neptunuslex.com/2006/06/23/might-be-were-circling-in-on-the-core-of-the-problem/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2006/06/23/might-be-were-circling-in-on-the-core-of-the-problem/</link>
	<description>The unbearable lightness of Lex. Enjoy!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:19:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neptunus Lex &#187; Pipes dissects Pew</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2006/06/23/might-be-were-circling-in-on-the-core-of-the-problem/comment-page-1/#comment-8918</link>
		<dc:creator>Neptunus Lex &#187; Pipes dissects Pew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 19:09:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/2006/06/23/might-be-were-circling-in-on-the-core-of-the-problem/#comment-8918</guid>
		<description>[...] Occasional reader (and professional Cassandra) Zane sends along this link, in which Middle East Forum director Daniel Pipes analyzes the Pew poll first referenced here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Occasional reader (and professional Cassandra) Zane sends along this link, in which Middle East Forum director Daniel Pipes analyzes the Pew poll first referenced here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kris, in New England</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2006/06/23/might-be-were-circling-in-on-the-core-of-the-problem/comment-page-1/#comment-8772</link>
		<dc:creator>Kris, in New England</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 20:18:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/2006/06/23/might-be-were-circling-in-on-the-core-of-the-problem/#comment-8772</guid>
		<description>Zane - alot to ponder and dissect. Thank you for taking the time to provide me with some avenues of research.

I guess if we are going to live in interesting times, it&#039;s probably helpful to know more about the enemy that makes things interesting...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zane &#8211; alot to ponder and dissect. Thank you for taking the time to provide me with some avenues of research.</p>
<p>I guess if we are going to live in interesting times, it&#8217;s probably helpful to know more about the enemy that makes things interesting&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zane</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2006/06/23/might-be-were-circling-in-on-the-core-of-the-problem/comment-page-1/#comment-8758</link>
		<dc:creator>Zane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 19:15:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/2006/06/23/might-be-were-circling-in-on-the-core-of-the-problem/#comment-8758</guid>
		<description>Kris,

There are numerous sites which, from a Christian and/or Jewish perspective, address the question of whether Allah (lit., &quot;The God&quot;, not &quot;God&quot;)is the same as the Christian or Jewish God.  From an Islamic perspective, Christians and Jews worship a false god, one that has been set in place of Allah.  From a practical perspective, however, their gods are not the same, that is, they expect very different behaviors from their followers.  For a different, atheist perspective, you might try Ali Sina&#039;s faithfreedom.org website.

And yes, if you learn the Sira, the biography of Mohammed, you&#039;ll find that after his own tribesmen, the Jews of Arabia were the second party to reject Mohammed&#039;s claim to Prophet status.  As those two relationships soured and Mohammed couldn&#039;t get the honor and hearing he felt his due, Allah&#039;s revelation became increasingly violent, resulting in the raids on the Meccan merchants, and wars with Jewish tribes, including the massacre of the Banu Qurayza, a Jewish tribe that had a treaty with Mohammed.  Their story is extremely instructive, as it is the model Muslims used, and still use, for treaties (al sulh) and ceasefires (hudna).  So in a way you can trace the antagonism back to Mohammed and the Jews.

Christians, Jews and Zoroastrians were considered by Mohammed not as kafir, but as believers who have been misled from the true revelation of Allah.  That is why they are called the People of the Book.  They are, nonetheless, deviants, and not to be accorded the rights and privileges of Muslims, and many Imams have argued that Christians and Jews are, in fact, polytheists and kafir.  Google the Pact of Omar (or Umar), which spells out the terms of the dhimmi, or the ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kris,</p>
<p>There are numerous sites which, from a Christian and/or Jewish perspective, address the question of whether Allah (lit., &#8220;The God&#8221;, not &#8220;God&#8221;)is the same as the Christian or Jewish God.  From an Islamic perspective, Christians and Jews worship a false god, one that has been set in place of Allah.  From a practical perspective, however, their gods are not the same, that is, they expect very different behaviors from their followers.  For a different, atheist perspective, you might try Ali Sina&#8217;s faithfreedom.org website.</p>
<p>And yes, if you learn the Sira, the biography of Mohammed, you&#8217;ll find that after his own tribesmen, the Jews of Arabia were the second party to reject Mohammed&#8217;s claim to Prophet status.  As those two relationships soured and Mohammed couldn&#8217;t get the honor and hearing he felt his due, Allah&#8217;s revelation became increasingly violent, resulting in the raids on the Meccan merchants, and wars with Jewish tribes, including the massacre of the Banu Qurayza, a Jewish tribe that had a treaty with Mohammed.  Their story is extremely instructive, as it is the model Muslims used, and still use, for treaties (al sulh) and ceasefires (hudna).  So in a way you can trace the antagonism back to Mohammed and the Jews.</p>
<p>Christians, Jews and Zoroastrians were considered by Mohammed not as kafir, but as believers who have been misled from the true revelation of Allah.  That is why they are called the People of the Book.  They are, nonetheless, deviants, and not to be accorded the rights and privileges of Muslims, and many Imams have argued that Christians and Jews are, in fact, polytheists and kafir.  Google the Pact of Omar (or Umar), which spells out the terms of the dhimmi, or the ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zane</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2006/06/23/might-be-were-circling-in-on-the-core-of-the-problem/comment-page-1/#comment-409228</link>
		<dc:creator>Zane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 19:15:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/2006/06/23/might-be-were-circling-in-on-the-core-of-the-problem/#comment-409228</guid>
		<description>Kris,

There are numerous sites which, from a Christian and/or Jewish perspective, address the question of whether Allah (lit., &quot;The God&quot;, not &quot;God&quot;)is the same as the Christian or Jewish God.  From an Islamic perspective, Christians and Jews worship a false god, one that has been set in place of Allah.  From a practical perspective, however, their gods are not the same, that is, they expect very different behaviors from their followers.  For a different, atheist perspective, you might try Ali Sina&#039;s faithfreedom.org website.

And yes, if you learn the Sira, the biography of Mohammed, you&#039;ll find that after his own tribesmen, the Jews of Arabia were the second party to reject Mohammed&#039;s claim to Prophet status.  As those two relationships soured and Mohammed couldn&#039;t get the honor and hearing he felt his due, Allah&#039;s revelation became increasingly violent, resulting in the raids on the Meccan merchants, and wars with Jewish tribes, including the massacre of the Banu Qurayza, a Jewish tribe that had a treaty with Mohammed.  Their story is extremely instructive, as it is the model Muslims used, and still use, for treaties (al sulh) and ceasefires (hudna).  So in a way you can trace the antagonism back to Mohammed and the Jews.

Christians, Jews and Zoroastrians were considered by Mohammed not as kafir, but as believers who have been misled from the true revelation of Allah.  That is why they are called the People of the Book.  They are, nonetheless, deviants, and not to be accorded the rights and privileges of Muslims, and many Imams have argued that Christians and Jews are, in fact, polytheists and kafir.  Google the Pact of Omar (or Umar), which spells out the terms of the dhimmi, or the “protection” of the People of the Book.  For 1450 years, these are the conditions that non-Muslims who live under Muslim rule must abide by, or suffer slavery, rape and death as a consequence.  All because they are not Muslim.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kris,</p>
<p>There are numerous sites which, from a Christian and/or Jewish perspective, address the question of whether Allah (lit., &#8220;The God&#8221;, not &#8220;God&#8221;)is the same as the Christian or Jewish God.  From an Islamic perspective, Christians and Jews worship a false god, one that has been set in place of Allah.  From a practical perspective, however, their gods are not the same, that is, they expect very different behaviors from their followers.  For a different, atheist perspective, you might try Ali Sina&#8217;s faithfreedom.org website.</p>
<p>And yes, if you learn the Sira, the biography of Mohammed, you&#8217;ll find that after his own tribesmen, the Jews of Arabia were the second party to reject Mohammed&#8217;s claim to Prophet status.  As those two relationships soured and Mohammed couldn&#8217;t get the honor and hearing he felt his due, Allah&#8217;s revelation became increasingly violent, resulting in the raids on the Meccan merchants, and wars with Jewish tribes, including the massacre of the Banu Qurayza, a Jewish tribe that had a treaty with Mohammed.  Their story is extremely instructive, as it is the model Muslims used, and still use, for treaties (al sulh) and ceasefires (hudna).  So in a way you can trace the antagonism back to Mohammed and the Jews.</p>
<p>Christians, Jews and Zoroastrians were considered by Mohammed not as kafir, but as believers who have been misled from the true revelation of Allah.  That is why they are called the People of the Book.  They are, nonetheless, deviants, and not to be accorded the rights and privileges of Muslims, and many Imams have argued that Christians and Jews are, in fact, polytheists and kafir.  Google the Pact of Omar (or Umar), which spells out the terms of the dhimmi, or the “protection” of the People of the Book.  For 1450 years, these are the conditions that non-Muslims who live under Muslim rule must abide by, or suffer slavery, rape and death as a consequence.  All because they are not Muslim.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kris, in New England</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2006/06/23/might-be-were-circling-in-on-the-core-of-the-problem/comment-page-1/#comment-8750</link>
		<dc:creator>Kris, in New England</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 18:12:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/2006/06/23/might-be-were-circling-in-on-the-core-of-the-problem/#comment-8750</guid>
		<description>Zane &amp; B2 - thank you for educating me on a portion of Islam that I wasn&#039;t familiar with. I&#039;m not novice enough to believe that it is a religion of peace, but I really had no idea the depth of the disgust and distrust was to this level. (I still think the conflict started with the Jews, and began to include the west over time. Perhaps a LONG time ago it started, but it was first with the Jews.)

Zane - forgive my naivete, but don&#039;t Muslims worship the same God that Christians do, even if they call him Allah? And if that&#039;s not as naive as I think it sounds, then how can this be justified when you talk about the kaffir: &quot;It is unforgivable, and Allah won?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zane &amp; B2 &#8211; thank you for educating me on a portion of Islam that I wasn&#8217;t familiar with. I&#8217;m not novice enough to believe that it is a religion of peace, but I really had no idea the depth of the disgust and distrust was to this level. (I still think the conflict started with the Jews, and began to include the west over time. Perhaps a LONG time ago it started, but it was first with the Jews.)</p>
<p>Zane &#8211; forgive my naivete, but don&#8217;t Muslims worship the same God that Christians do, even if they call him Allah? And if that&#8217;s not as naive as I think it sounds, then how can this be justified when you talk about the kaffir: &#8220;It is unforgivable, and Allah won?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kris, in New England</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2006/06/23/might-be-were-circling-in-on-the-core-of-the-problem/comment-page-1/#comment-409227</link>
		<dc:creator>Kris, in New England</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 18:12:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/2006/06/23/might-be-were-circling-in-on-the-core-of-the-problem/#comment-409227</guid>
		<description>Zane &amp; B2 - thank you for educating me on a portion of Islam that I wasn&#039;t familiar with. I&#039;m not novice enough to believe that it is a religion of peace, but I really had no idea the depth of the disgust and distrust was to this level. (I still think the conflict started with the Jews, and began to include the west over time. Perhaps a LONG time ago it started, but it was first with the Jews.)

Zane - forgive my naivete, but don&#039;t Muslims worship the same God that Christians do, even if they call him Allah? And if that&#039;s not as naive as I think it sounds, then how can this be justified when you talk about the kaffir: &quot;It is unforgivable, and Allah won’t forgive it. It follows that the unbeliever (kaffir, infidel, take your choice) is less than human, less than swine, and must be either converted, subjected, or killed.&quot;

It encourages genocide, in a religious context. And I guess I am naive in the end, because I don&#039;t understand how they can say they are a peace-loving faith on one hand, yet their most revered prophet advocates cold-blooded mass murder.

Eye opening to say the least Zane. Frightening and clarifying.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zane &amp; B2 &#8211; thank you for educating me on a portion of Islam that I wasn&#8217;t familiar with. I&#8217;m not novice enough to believe that it is a religion of peace, but I really had no idea the depth of the disgust and distrust was to this level. (I still think the conflict started with the Jews, and began to include the west over time. Perhaps a LONG time ago it started, but it was first with the Jews.)</p>
<p>Zane &#8211; forgive my naivete, but don&#8217;t Muslims worship the same God that Christians do, even if they call him Allah? And if that&#8217;s not as naive as I think it sounds, then how can this be justified when you talk about the kaffir: &#8220;It is unforgivable, and Allah won’t forgive it. It follows that the unbeliever (kaffir, infidel, take your choice) is less than human, less than swine, and must be either converted, subjected, or killed.&#8221;</p>
<p>It encourages genocide, in a religious context. And I guess I am naive in the end, because I don&#8217;t understand how they can say they are a peace-loving faith on one hand, yet their most revered prophet advocates cold-blooded mass murder.</p>
<p>Eye opening to say the least Zane. Frightening and clarifying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

