<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Still not clear on the concept</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neptunuslex.com/2006/08/14/still-not-clear-on-the-concept/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2006/08/14/still-not-clear-on-the-concept/</link>
	<description>The unbearable lightness of Lex. Enjoy!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:19:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2006/08/14/still-not-clear-on-the-concept/comment-page-1/#comment-12587</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2006 19:20:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/2006/08/14/still-not-clear-on-the-concept/#comment-12587</guid>
		<description>Yup. A relic.

Thought you demolished that particular windmill whereas I just ticked off Sancho. You keep what&#039;s left of that windmill. I&#039;ll purport to stick with your solution to the conundrum and focus on Dulcinea. http://www.pdngallery.com/legends/legends6/large/08.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yup. A relic.</p>
<p>Thought you demolished that particular windmill whereas I just ticked off Sancho. You keep what&#8217;s left of that windmill. I&#8217;ll purport to stick with your solution to the conundrum and focus on Dulcinea. <a href="http://www.pdngallery.com/legends/legends6/large/08.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.pdngallery.com/legends/legends6/large/08.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lex</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2006/08/14/still-not-clear-on-the-concept/comment-page-1/#comment-12507</link>
		<dc:creator>lex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2006 22:19:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/2006/08/14/still-not-clear-on-the-concept/#comment-12507</guid>
		<description>Had summat to do with them godless communists as I recollect, and was considered at the time a non-controversial branding distinction. Now it is I suppose the relic of a simpler time, which some among us cannot bear to part with for sentimental reasons, and which others purport to take offense at for reasons of their own.

But it&#039;s fair to say that I tilt at other windmills Paul, and will leave that particular one to you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Had summat to do with them godless communists as I recollect, and was considered at the time a non-controversial branding distinction. Now it is I suppose the relic of a simpler time, which some among us cannot bear to part with for sentimental reasons, and which others purport to take offense at for reasons of their own.</p>
<p>But it&#8217;s fair to say that I tilt at other windmills Paul, and will leave that particular one to you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2006/08/14/still-not-clear-on-the-concept/comment-page-1/#comment-12504</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2006 21:55:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/2006/08/14/still-not-clear-on-the-concept/#comment-12504</guid>
		<description>&quot;...we handle that particular conundrum by ah, not having a religion.&quot;

Very well put. A pity that the Pledge of Allegiance in the great nation of ours is not quite in sync with that admirable sentiment. Since 1954, anyway. From 1892 until 1954, religion had not yet pledged to divide the indivisible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;we handle that particular conundrum by ah, not having a religion.&#8221;</p>
<p>Very well put. A pity that the Pledge of Allegiance in the great nation of ours is not quite in sync with that admirable sentiment. Since 1954, anyway. From 1892 until 1954, religion had not yet pledged to divide the indivisible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zane</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2006/08/14/still-not-clear-on-the-concept/comment-page-1/#comment-12450</link>
		<dc:creator>Zane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2006 02:14:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/2006/08/14/still-not-clear-on-the-concept/#comment-12450</guid>
		<description>Yemen is a what?  You can say that with a straight face?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yemen is a what?  You can say that with a straight face?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kris, in New England</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2006/08/14/still-not-clear-on-the-concept/comment-page-1/#comment-12394</link>
		<dc:creator>Kris, in New England</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2006 15:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/2006/08/14/still-not-clear-on-the-concept/#comment-12394</guid>
		<description>It does seem that countries that are theocracies of some kind (particularly the Muslim kind) really can&#039;t understand how it is to accept other people&#039;s differences in religious practice, and not feel the need to slaughter them en masse.

And it&#039;s interesting to note that while the judge first says &quot;...Yemeni law...&quot; he clarifies what that REALLY means when he says &quot;...Islamic sharia law...&quot;. It&#039;s a different justice book in so many ways isn&#039;t it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It does seem that countries that are theocracies of some kind (particularly the Muslim kind) really can&#8217;t understand how it is to accept other people&#8217;s differences in religious practice, and not feel the need to slaughter them en masse.</p>
<p>And it&#8217;s interesting to note that while the judge first says &#8220;&#8230;Yemeni law&#8230;&#8221; he clarifies what that REALLY means when he says &#8220;&#8230;Islamic sharia law&#8230;&#8221;. It&#8217;s a different justice book in so many ways isn&#8217;t it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: badbob</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2006/08/14/still-not-clear-on-the-concept/comment-page-1/#comment-12368</link>
		<dc:creator>badbob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2006 02:53:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/2006/08/14/still-not-clear-on-the-concept/#comment-12368</guid>
		<description>Unless it&#039;s trout I only approve of this form of catch and release:
http://www.thejump.net/humor/catch-and-release.jpg

B2</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unless it&#8217;s trout I only approve of this form of catch and release:<br />
<a href="http://www.thejump.net/humor/catch-and-release.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.thejump.net/humor/catch-and-release.jpg</a></p>
<p>B2</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

