Comments on: Framing Rumsfeld http://www.neptunuslex.com/2006/08/30/framing-rumsfeld/ The unbearable lightness of Lex. Enjoy! Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:43:20 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Skippy-san http://www.neptunuslex.com/2006/08/30/framing-rumsfeld/comment-page-1/#comment-13659 Skippy-san Fri, 01 Sep 2006 02:56:01 +0000 http://www.neptunuslex.com/2006/08/30/framing-rumsfeld/#comment-13659 "The man? “The man?

]]> By: Skippy-san http://www.neptunuslex.com/2006/08/30/framing-rumsfeld/comment-page-1/#comment-409395 Skippy-san Fri, 01 Sep 2006 02:56:01 +0000 http://www.neptunuslex.com/2006/08/30/framing-rumsfeld/#comment-409395 "The man’s an agenda-driven hack journalist, a low grade Bill Reilly of the left, whose only contributions to the national discourse are to grind out softcore pr0n for the nutroots." That's a keeper in terms of quotes. “The man’s an agenda-driven hack journalist, a low grade Bill Reilly of the left, whose only contributions to the national discourse are to grind out softcore pr0n for the nutroots.”

That’s a keeper in terms of quotes.

]]> By: lex http://www.neptunuslex.com/2006/08/30/framing-rumsfeld/comment-page-1/#comment-13610 lex Thu, 31 Aug 2006 14:21:58 +0000 http://www.neptunuslex.com/2006/08/30/framing-rumsfeld/#comment-13610 Good heavens, what an oddly constructed universe it must be that the physics admit the possibility that Olberman provides "balance" to any issue. The man's an agenda-driven hack journalist, a low grade Bill Reilly of the left, whose only contributions to the national discourse are to grind out softcore pr0n for the nutroots. You want balance, place the fulcrum under Rumsfeld's actual remarks - read what he <em>really</em> said, and not what those who would attack him <em>wish</em> he might have said. Good heavens, what an oddly constructed universe it must be that the physics admit the possibility that Olberman provides “balance” to any issue. The man’s an agenda-driven hack journalist, a low grade Bill Reilly of the left, whose only contributions to the national discourse are to grind out softcore pr0n for the nutroots.

You want balance, place the fulcrum under Rumsfeld’s actual remarks – read what he really said, and not what those who would attack him wish he might have said.

]]> By: Steve http://www.neptunuslex.com/2006/08/30/framing-rumsfeld/comment-page-1/#comment-13603 Steve Thu, 31 Aug 2006 12:40:42 +0000 http://www.neptunuslex.com/2006/08/30/framing-rumsfeld/#comment-13603 I find it alarming to see the MSM, with its context-bending cherry-picking of quotes and fauxtography, sliding into the Michael Moore role of agenda-based jounalism. The fact that those who agree with the agenda deny it's occurring is equally alarming. I find it alarming to see the MSM, with its context-bending cherry-picking of quotes and fauxtography, sliding into the Michael Moore role of agenda-based jounalism.
The fact that those who agree with the agenda deny it’s occurring is equally alarming.

]]> By: fliterman http://www.neptunuslex.com/2006/08/30/framing-rumsfeld/comment-page-1/#comment-13578 fliterman Thu, 31 Aug 2006 06:31:07 +0000 http://www.neptunuslex.com/2006/08/30/framing-rumsfeld/#comment-13578 http://movies.crooksandliars.com/OlbermannBlastsRumsfeldOnFacism.wmv http://movies.crooksandliars.com/OlbermannBlastsRumsfeldOnFacism.wmv

]]> By: fliterman http://www.neptunuslex.com/2006/08/30/framing-rumsfeld/comment-page-1/#comment-13577 fliterman Thu, 31 Aug 2006 06:29:40 +0000 http://www.neptunuslex.com/2006/08/30/framing-rumsfeld/#comment-13577 Most of you all won't like Obermann's biting and insightful commentary, but for a "balanced" conclusion, it's necessary: Most of you all won’t like Obermann’s biting and insightful commentary, but for a “balanced” conclusion, it’s necessary:

]]>