<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Presidential censorship</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neptunuslex.com/2006/09/07/presidential-censorship/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2006/09/07/presidential-censorship/</link>
	<description>The unbearable lightness of Lex. Enjoy!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 06:48:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2006/09/07/presidential-censorship/comment-page-1/#comment-14994</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Sep 2006 02:16:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/2006/09/07/presidential-censorship/#comment-14994</guid>
		<description>You bad, badbob... you bad</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You bad, badbob&#8230; you bad</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: badbob</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2006/09/07/presidential-censorship/comment-page-1/#comment-14977</link>
		<dc:creator>badbob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2006 23:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/2006/09/07/presidential-censorship/#comment-14977</guid>
		<description>Here it is:

http://victorholt.com/journalism/president3.jpg

B2</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here it is:</p>
<p><a href="http://victorholt.com/journalism/president3.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://victorholt.com/journalism/president3.jpg</a></p>
<p>B2</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: badbob</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2006/09/07/presidential-censorship/comment-page-1/#comment-14933</link>
		<dc:creator>badbob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2006 17:20:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/2006/09/07/presidential-censorship/#comment-14933</guid>
		<description>Did you see the photo op for righteous, lip biting indignation yesterday over this issue.
Kerry, Clinton &amp; Carter lined up left to right?

Here&#039;s a link:                                http://www.stillruns.com/hooptie/three_stooges_golf_with_your_friendsx.jpg


Ooops wrong link. Sorry.

B2- nnyyuk, nyuuk</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you see the photo op for righteous, lip biting indignation yesterday over this issue.<br />
Kerry, Clinton &amp; Carter lined up left to right?</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a link:                                <a href="http://www.stillruns.com/hooptie/three_stooges_golf_with_your_friendsx.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.stillruns.com/hooptie/three_stooges_golf_with_your_friendsx.jpg</a></p>
<p>Ooops wrong link. Sorry.</p>
<p>B2- nnyyuk, nyuuk</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curt</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2006/09/07/presidential-censorship/comment-page-1/#comment-14929</link>
		<dc:creator>Curt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2006 16:50:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/2006/09/07/presidential-censorship/#comment-14929</guid>
		<description>I approve of all spelling errors in my previous post (pick a post, any of them)...

I can spell, I just can&#039;t type....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I approve of all spelling errors in my previous post (pick a post, any of them)&#8230;</p>
<p>I can spell, I just can&#8217;t type&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curt</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2006/09/07/presidential-censorship/comment-page-1/#comment-14927</link>
		<dc:creator>Curt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2006 16:35:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/2006/09/07/presidential-censorship/#comment-14927</guid>
		<description>While Bill&#039;s at trying to cover his ass, maybe he can call his personal aide, Buzz Patterson, a liar.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://sandgram.blogspot.com/2006/08/pins-and-needles.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Take a few hours to read what Bill did, when he should have been attending to the affairs of the Nation&lt;/a&gt;.

If I recall, Buzz was never admonished by his profession for a lack of professionalism, let alone being convicted of being a liar by a judge in the judicial system the left wing loves to use, instead of a ballot box.

Quite honestly, it&#039;s getting sickening to see such blantant attempts to &quot;chill&quot; free speech.  Hillary could certainly stand up and screech about not being allowed to dissent, but when it comes to taking a formal national document and presenting it, her family has a problem.

Who really wants the police state?  I&#039;d say it&#039;s Clinton and the Democrats, taking away free speech , even in the private sector.  I believe the point of the Constititional protections of free speech were specifically put there to protect citizens from the government squelching them.  I think an outcry of a former president is very much like a goernment official telling the people what they can and can&#039;t say.  I guess the question is:  Is he acting as a living president, or as a private citizen, when he applies his &quot;influence&quot; to this situation..

And...what documents didn&#039;t ever make it into the report (probably the really damning ones), because Sandy Burger stole official government documents (and, yes, was convicted in a court of law) that would have shed even more light on what really happened?

Hmmmm...that reminds me of the famous Bill Clinton letter to his ROTC advisor, saying he was getting out to make him viable for a future political career, which...yep, you guessed, also had been removed from the records of the University in question....

The terrorists like to keep going after aircraft, because that&#039;s a favorite tactic.  Looks like the Clinton&#039;s tactic is removing of evidence...oh, toss in the search of Vince Foster&#039;s residence, by Hillary&#039;s staff before the law enforcement people got in there.

Al Gore can tell lies about the state of the Universe and our planet, Mikkael Moore gets a pass, the &quot;Loose Change&quot; 9/11 was a hoax video can get press, but...just tell the story of a govenrnment investigation and all hell breaks loose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While Bill&#8217;s at trying to cover his ass, maybe he can call his personal aide, Buzz Patterson, a liar.  <a href="http://sandgram.blogspot.com/2006/08/pins-and-needles.html" rel="nofollow">Take a few hours to read what Bill did, when he should have been attending to the affairs of the Nation</a>.</p>
<p>If I recall, Buzz was never admonished by his profession for a lack of professionalism, let alone being convicted of being a liar by a judge in the judicial system the left wing loves to use, instead of a ballot box.</p>
<p>Quite honestly, it&#8217;s getting sickening to see such blantant attempts to &#8220;chill&#8221; free speech.  Hillary could certainly stand up and screech about not being allowed to dissent, but when it comes to taking a formal national document and presenting it, her family has a problem.</p>
<p>Who really wants the police state?  I&#8217;d say it&#8217;s Clinton and the Democrats, taking away free speech , even in the private sector.  I believe the point of the Constititional protections of free speech were specifically put there to protect citizens from the government squelching them.  I think an outcry of a former president is very much like a goernment official telling the people what they can and can&#8217;t say.  I guess the question is:  Is he acting as a living president, or as a private citizen, when he applies his &#8220;influence&#8221; to this situation..</p>
<p>And&#8230;what documents didn&#8217;t ever make it into the report (probably the really damning ones), because Sandy Burger stole official government documents (and, yes, was convicted in a court of law) that would have shed even more light on what really happened?</p>
<p>Hmmmm&#8230;that reminds me of the famous Bill Clinton letter to his ROTC advisor, saying he was getting out to make him viable for a future political career, which&#8230;yep, you guessed, also had been removed from the records of the University in question&#8230;.</p>
<p>The terrorists like to keep going after aircraft, because that&#8217;s a favorite tactic.  Looks like the Clinton&#8217;s tactic is removing of evidence&#8230;oh, toss in the search of Vince Foster&#8217;s residence, by Hillary&#8217;s staff before the law enforcement people got in there.</p>
<p>Al Gore can tell lies about the state of the Universe and our planet, Mikkael Moore gets a pass, the &#8220;Loose Change&#8221; 9/11 was a hoax video can get press, but&#8230;just tell the story of a govenrnment investigation and all hell breaks loose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Were-Kitten</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2006/09/07/presidential-censorship/comment-page-1/#comment-14921</link>
		<dc:creator>Were-Kitten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2006 15:51:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/2006/09/07/presidential-censorship/#comment-14921</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I&#039;m trying to come out of my shell and be more honest.  hehe...

But seriously, ABC has maintained all along that this miniseries is &quot;fiction based upon fact&quot;.  It&#039;s no different than just about ANY documentary-made-into-a-movie.  It&#039;s not an editorial.

The biggest difference between this series and F911 is that F911 took a LOT of taped interviews out of context and mislead some of the interviewees about the point of the movie.

The media has been notoriously biased against the current Republican administration, and now that they are putting forth a story about a prior Democratic administration, the Dem&#039;s are hitting the roof.  

I stand by my original statement:  F*ck You.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I&#8217;m trying to come out of my shell and be more honest.  hehe&#8230;</p>
<p>But seriously, ABC has maintained all along that this miniseries is &#8220;fiction based upon fact&#8221;.  It&#8217;s no different than just about ANY documentary-made-into-a-movie.  It&#8217;s not an editorial.</p>
<p>The biggest difference between this series and F911 is that F911 took a LOT of taped interviews out of context and mislead some of the interviewees about the point of the movie.</p>
<p>The media has been notoriously biased against the current Republican administration, and now that they are putting forth a story about a prior Democratic administration, the Dem&#8217;s are hitting the roof.  </p>
<p>I stand by my original statement:  F*ck You.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

