Comments on: Schism http://www.neptunuslex.com/2006/11/25/schism/ The unbearable lightness of Lex. Enjoy! Thu, 09 Feb 2012 22:45:53 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: capn george http://www.neptunuslex.com/2006/11/25/schism/comment-page-1/#comment-29359 capn george Tue, 28 Nov 2006 23:23:30 +0000 http://www.neptunuslex.com/2006/11/25/schism/#comment-29359 I you cross the Rubicon, don't forget to bring that "fifth" you mentioned in a previous post. Us mackerel snappers have a few orthodoxy issues we're dealing with... Quo vadis? I you cross the Rubicon, don’t forget to bring that “fifth” you mentioned in a previous post.
Us mackerel snappers have a few orthodoxy issues we’re dealing with…

Quo vadis?

]]> By: badbob http://www.neptunuslex.com/2006/11/25/schism/comment-page-1/#comment-29078 badbob Mon, 27 Nov 2006 20:33:31 +0000 http://www.neptunuslex.com/2006/11/25/schism/#comment-29078 This sinner ain't entering any Old/New Testament discussions but this hit me in the face a couple weeks back: http://www.virtueonline.org/portal/modules/news/article.php?storyid=4990 Being a snapper and all I haven't forgotten it and I don't mean to pile on Lex... B2 This sinner ain’t entering any Old/New Testament discussions but this hit me in the face a couple weeks back:

http://www.virtueonline.org/portal/modules/news/article.php?storyid=4990

Being a snapper and all I haven’t forgotten it and I don’t mean to pile on Lex…

B2

]]> By: MajMike http://www.neptunuslex.com/2006/11/25/schism/comment-page-1/#comment-29028 MajMike Mon, 27 Nov 2006 14:28:58 +0000 http://www.neptunuslex.com/2006/11/25/schism/#comment-29028 quid est? in vino! come on back across the Rubicon big guy, we'll be waiting for ya in Rome... quid est? in vino!

come on back across the Rubicon big guy, we’ll be waiting for ya in Rome…

]]> By: John http://www.neptunuslex.com/2006/11/25/schism/comment-page-1/#comment-28936 John Mon, 27 Nov 2006 04:28:33 +0000 http://www.neptunuslex.com/2006/11/25/schism/#comment-28936 Lex, I think you might like this blog by an Episcopal priest in Raleigh, NC. http://anglicancentrist.blogspot.com/ John Lex,
I think you might like this blog by an Episcopal priest in Raleigh, NC.
http://anglicancentrist.blogspot.com/

John

]]> By: Kristen http://www.neptunuslex.com/2006/11/25/schism/comment-page-1/#comment-28854 Kristen Sun, 26 Nov 2006 21:22:33 +0000 http://www.neptunuslex.com/2006/11/25/schism/#comment-28854 It's hard to believe that the leaders of the American Episcopal church thought that they could go on reinventing the denomination forever with no serious consequences. "And they that soweth the wind, shall reap the whirlwind." It’s hard to believe that the leaders of the American Episcopal church thought that they could go on reinventing the denomination forever with no serious consequences.

“And they that soweth the wind, shall reap the whirlwind.”

]]> By: Phil Andrilla http://www.neptunuslex.com/2006/11/25/schism/comment-page-1/#comment-28795 Phil Andrilla Sun, 26 Nov 2006 15:56:03 +0000 http://www.neptunuslex.com/2006/11/25/schism/#comment-28795 Tim, I can not take the bible ala carte. From Genesis to Revelation is the bible I read and rely on for God's thoughts. I believe that contains the full revelation that God intended for us to know about him and is sufficent for us to know how to be reconciled to him. Romans says we have all sinned and fall short of the glory of God. ALL have sinned save one, Christ himself, being God incarnate. Which version of the bible, you ask? I prefer the New Internation Version, but I rely on several versions to garner a fuller understanding. There are versions I avoid, one being used by Jehovah Whitnesses own version unique to themselves. Also, I do not consider the Book of Morman to be part of the bible. It is it's own text and I do not put it in the standing as the bible. I do not believe it's text was inspired by God. I do engage in conversation with the above demoninations when they come to the door, but in the end we part agreeing to disagree. Tim,
I can not take the bible ala carte. From Genesis to Revelation is the bible I read and rely on for God’s thoughts. I believe that contains the full revelation that God intended for us to know about him and is sufficent for us to know how to be reconciled to him. Romans says we have all sinned and fall short of the glory of God. ALL have sinned save one, Christ himself, being God incarnate.

Which version of the bible, you ask? I prefer the New Internation Version, but I rely on several versions to garner a fuller understanding. There are versions I avoid, one being used by Jehovah Whitnesses own version unique to themselves. Also, I do not consider the Book of Morman to be part of the bible. It is it’s own text and I do not put it in the standing as the bible. I do not believe it’s text was inspired by God. I do engage in conversation with the above demoninations when they come to the door, but in the end we part agreeing to disagree.

]]>