<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Safety standdown</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neptunuslex.com/2007/01/12/safety-standdown/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2007/01/12/safety-standdown/</link>
	<description>The unbearable lightness of Lex. Enjoy!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:43:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: dc</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2007/01/12/safety-standdown/comment-page-1/#comment-39978</link>
		<dc:creator>dc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jan 2007 14:10:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/2007/01/12/safety-standdown/#comment-39978</guid>
		<description>I like to think of the venturi effect quoted, is like NASCAR. &quot;I ain&#039;t Tailgatin&#039;, I&#039;m Draftin&#039;!&quot;

Safety Standown&#039;s always seemed to me to be a good tool to make us take a breath, review our thought processes. That, and the endless loop play of Men Without Hats, &quot;Safety Dance&quot;, in the background.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like to think of the venturi effect quoted, is like NASCAR. &#8220;I ain&#8217;t Tailgatin&#8217;, I&#8217;m Draftin&#8217;!&#8221;</p>
<p>Safety Standown&#8217;s always seemed to me to be a good tool to make us take a breath, review our thought processes. That, and the endless loop play of Men Without Hats, &#8220;Safety Dance&#8221;, in the background.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skippy-san</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2007/01/12/safety-standdown/comment-page-1/#comment-39725</link>
		<dc:creator>Skippy-san</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 23:08:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/2007/01/12/safety-standdown/#comment-39725</guid>
		<description>What amazes me is that their is a venturi effect with two objects that big. Gives me a whole new appreciation for the forces of nature.........</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What amazes me is that their is a venturi effect with two objects that big. Gives me a whole new appreciation for the forces of nature&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nose</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2007/01/12/safety-standdown/comment-page-1/#comment-39706</link>
		<dc:creator>Nose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 21:45:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/2007/01/12/safety-standdown/#comment-39706</guid>
		<description>&quot;Venturi effect sucking the sub up into the tanker...&quot;

YGBSM!


Hope we don&#039;t tell the ChiComs when we are standing down, they might sneak up on us!

N</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Venturi effect sucking the sub up into the tanker&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>YGBSM!</p>
<p>Hope we don&#8217;t tell the ChiComs when we are standing down, they might sneak up on us!</p>
<p>N</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Howard</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2007/01/12/safety-standdown/comment-page-1/#comment-39690</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Howard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 20:03:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/2007/01/12/safety-standdown/#comment-39690</guid>
		<description>When I was a WSO/EWO in F-111s in the late 80s and early 90s it seemed like we had stand downs on an almost weekly basis.

The thing that irked me was that we lost very few F-111s in that period, the bugs in that airplane having long since been either worked out or fully understood by our forefathers.

What was happening was that F-16s were falling from the sky like raindrops in spring, and everytime one of the single seat sky-gods trashed a jet we had to stop flying for a day and figure out why those guys crashed so much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I was a WSO/EWO in F-111s in the late 80s and early 90s it seemed like we had stand downs on an almost weekly basis.</p>
<p>The thing that irked me was that we lost very few F-111s in that period, the bugs in that airplane having long since been either worked out or fully understood by our forefathers.</p>
<p>What was happening was that F-16s were falling from the sky like raindrops in spring, and everytime one of the single seat sky-gods trashed a jet we had to stop flying for a day and figure out why those guys crashed so much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PigBoatSailor</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2007/01/12/safety-standdown/comment-page-1/#comment-39678</link>
		<dc:creator>PigBoatSailor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 18:45:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/2007/01/12/safety-standdown/#comment-39678</guid>
		<description>If the stand-down is a sub fleet wide event, then &lt;a href=&quot;http://makeyourdepth.blogspot.com/2007/01/safety-stand-down.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;I think we are actually not helping ourselves&lt;/a&gt;, actually.  The most likely root cause was an ORM failure in the upper chain of command.  This is not something that a deckplate sailor affects, and a stand-down that takes them away from their work will only end up hurting them.

However, if the stand-down is more a procedural and ORM review, as &lt;a href=&quot;http://bubbleheads.blogspot.com/2007/01/uss-newport-news-makes-bahrain.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Bubblehead opines&lt;/a&gt;, then perhaps it will have some value.

I am not disparaging the idea of a stand-down, having gone through a few, one of which definitely did make a noticable, immediate impact.  I am, however, skeptical of actions that appear to be not much more than knee-jerk CYA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the stand-down is a sub fleet wide event, then <a href="http://makeyourdepth.blogspot.com/2007/01/safety-stand-down.html" rel="nofollow">I think we are actually not helping ourselves</a>, actually.  The most likely root cause was an ORM failure in the upper chain of command.  This is not something that a deckplate sailor affects, and a stand-down that takes them away from their work will only end up hurting them.</p>
<p>However, if the stand-down is more a procedural and ORM review, as <a href="http://bubbleheads.blogspot.com/2007/01/uss-newport-news-makes-bahrain.html" rel="nofollow">Bubblehead opines</a>, then perhaps it will have some value.</p>
<p>I am not disparaging the idea of a stand-down, having gone through a few, one of which definitely did make a noticable, immediate impact.  I am, however, skeptical of actions that appear to be not much more than knee-jerk CYA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

