Nothing in it YOU don’t already know of course. Just seeing the faces….you know, makes it more personal. Did for me.

b2

Of course, if I gathered them into one documentary and focused on their support of immigration law and border fences you could:

a) draw the conclusion that everyone after border fences was a white supremist (if you were an idiot).

but, more important and more likely…

b) I could make you believe that white supremists groups were very dangerous,violent organizations that represented an imminent danger to our liberal lifestyle.

interesting, they are dangerous, they are violent and, wherever their groups are, they do represent an imminent danger to the people living in those towns. However, we are hardly likely to be over run by white supremists who take control of the government or any other territory within the US.

Then again, if you want to highlight a behavior, how do you quatify it and qualify it against other behaviors when doing so would totally ruin the entire point of high-lighting the behavior?

Maybe we should tell people the percentage of the city’s population that are actually armed robbers compared to the number of people that are not. The only reason you would do that is to make people believe that they are relatively safe from armed robbery. thus, they don’t have to worry about locking their doors or getting an alarm system to reduce the odds.

No one would tell another person that.

Why would we turn our faces from dangerous idealogues? So we can pretend it doesn’t exist?