<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lawmaker blasts lawyer for her interpretation of the law she drafted, saying, &#8220;Oh, so now you want to get all picky and legalistic, and everything!&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neptunuslex.com/2007/03/18/lawmaker-blasts-lawyer-for-her-interpretation-of-the-law-she-drafted-saying-oh-so-now-you-want-to-get-all-picky-and-legalistic-and-everything/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2007/03/18/lawmaker-blasts-lawyer-for-her-interpretation-of-the-law-she-drafted-saying-oh-so-now-you-want-to-get-all-picky-and-legalistic-and-everything/</link>
	<description>The unbearable lightness of Lex. Enjoy!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:19:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daveg</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2007/03/18/lawmaker-blasts-lawyer-for-her-interpretation-of-the-law-she-drafted-saying-oh-so-now-you-want-to-get-all-picky-and-legalistic-and-everything/comment-page-1/#comment-58114</link>
		<dc:creator>Daveg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 16:10:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/2007/03/18/lawmaker-blasts-lawyer-for-her-interpretation-of-the-law-she-drafted-saying-oh-so-now-you-want-to-get-all-picky-and-legalistic-and-everything/#comment-58114</guid>
		<description>Ok, exactly why would that proceeding be called a hearing?  The only thing that buffoon heard was his own badgering of the witness.  What is the point of even pretending to ask a question if you won&#039;t listen to the answer?  Frankly, I could hardly concentrate on what he was bloviating with the repetition of &quot;STFU&quot; going on in my head.

What a waste of oxygen that man is!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, exactly why would that proceeding be called a hearing?  The only thing that buffoon heard was his own badgering of the witness.  What is the point of even pretending to ask a question if you won&#8217;t listen to the answer?  Frankly, I could hardly concentrate on what he was bloviating with the repetition of &#8220;STFU&#8221; going on in my head.</p>
<p>What a waste of oxygen that man is!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daveg</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2007/03/18/lawmaker-blasts-lawyer-for-her-interpretation-of-the-law-she-drafted-saying-oh-so-now-you-want-to-get-all-picky-and-legalistic-and-everything/comment-page-1/#comment-58112</link>
		<dc:creator>Daveg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 16:04:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/2007/03/18/lawmaker-blasts-lawyer-for-her-interpretation-of-the-law-she-drafted-saying-oh-so-now-you-want-to-get-all-picky-and-legalistic-and-everything/#comment-58112</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>?</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daveg</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2007/03/18/lawmaker-blasts-lawyer-for-her-interpretation-of-the-law-she-drafted-saying-oh-so-now-you-want-to-get-all-picky-and-legalistic-and-everything/comment-page-1/#comment-409915</link>
		<dc:creator>Daveg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 16:04:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/2007/03/18/lawmaker-blasts-lawyer-for-her-interpretation-of-the-law-she-drafted-saying-oh-so-now-you-want-to-get-all-picky-and-legalistic-and-everything/#comment-409915</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;“How in he$$ am I going to protect these fools?”&lt;/i&gt;

Or, more accurately, why in the he$$ would I &lt;i&gt;want&lt;/i&gt; to??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>“How in he$$ am I going to protect these fools?”</i></p>
<p>Or, more accurately, why in the he$$ would I <i>want</i> to??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: badbob</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2007/03/18/lawmaker-blasts-lawyer-for-her-interpretation-of-the-law-she-drafted-saying-oh-so-now-you-want-to-get-all-picky-and-legalistic-and-everything/comment-page-1/#comment-58077</link>
		<dc:creator>badbob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 14:20:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/2007/03/18/lawmaker-blasts-lawyer-for-her-interpretation-of-the-law-she-drafted-saying-oh-so-now-you-want-to-get-all-picky-and-legalistic-and-everything/#comment-58077</guid>
		<description>Caesar? Waxman?

You definetly mean Nero, right? ;-)

Waxman reminds me of a small rodent, always has.

B2</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Caesar? Waxman?</p>
<p>You definetly mean Nero, right? <img src='http://www.neptunuslex.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Waxman reminds me of a small rodent, always has.</p>
<p>B2</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seniord</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2007/03/18/lawmaker-blasts-lawyer-for-her-interpretation-of-the-law-she-drafted-saying-oh-so-now-you-want-to-get-all-picky-and-legalistic-and-everything/comment-page-1/#comment-58041</link>
		<dc:creator>Seniord</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 12:39:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/2007/03/18/lawmaker-blasts-lawyer-for-her-interpretation-of-the-law-she-drafted-saying-oh-so-now-you-want-to-get-all-picky-and-legalistic-and-everything/#comment-58041</guid>
		<description>Cap&#039;n,

From &#039;Aesop and Son&#039; (thank you to the creators of &#039;Rocky and Bulwinkle&#039;!)

Those that can - do.
Those that can&#039;t - become Congresscritters

To think the Good People of the 30th Congerssional District (L.A., Malibu, Beverly Hills, etc.) get to spend $150,000 per year for Mr. Waxman to represent them.  But then, they get what they pay for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cap&#8217;n,</p>
<p>From &#8216;Aesop and Son&#8217; (thank you to the creators of &#8216;Rocky and Bulwinkle&#8217;!)</p>
<p>Those that can &#8211; do.<br />
Those that can&#8217;t &#8211; become Congresscritters</p>
<p>To think the Good People of the 30th Congerssional District (L.A., Malibu, Beverly Hills, etc.) get to spend $150,000 per year for Mr. Waxman to represent them.  But then, they get what they pay for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AW1 Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2007/03/18/lawmaker-blasts-lawyer-for-her-interpretation-of-the-law-she-drafted-saying-oh-so-now-you-want-to-get-all-picky-and-legalistic-and-everything/comment-page-1/#comment-58013</link>
		<dc:creator>AW1 Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 11:16:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/2007/03/18/lawmaker-blasts-lawyer-for-her-interpretation-of-the-law-she-drafted-saying-oh-so-now-you-want-to-get-all-picky-and-legalistic-and-everything/#comment-58013</guid>
		<description>Shipmates,

     Yea, Waxman reminded me a lot of the Queen in &quot;Alice in Wonderland&quot;.. I bet he was just itching to cry out &quot;OFF WITH HER HEAD!&quot;

     Maybe we finally found the source of global warming?

     Respects,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shipmates,</p>
<p>     Yea, Waxman reminded me a lot of the Queen in &#8220;Alice in Wonderland&#8221;.. I bet he was just itching to cry out &#8220;OFF WITH HER HEAD!&#8221;</p>
<p>     Maybe we finally found the source of global warming?</p>
<p>     Respects,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

