<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The &#8220;larger issues&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neptunuslex.com/2007/04/17/the-larger-issues/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2007/04/17/the-larger-issues/</link>
	<description>The unbearable lightness of Lex. Enjoy!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 21:40:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: andreas04: close to attraction</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2007/04/17/the-larger-issues/comment-page-1/#comment-71038</link>
		<dc:creator>andreas04: close to attraction</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 20:21:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/2007/04/17/the-larger-issues/#comment-71038</guid>
		<description>[...] Neptunus Lex takes down one of the complete idiots that somehow connects the shooter with American foreign policy. Simply put, when you hate Bush as much as the left does, common sense is not involved with any type of discussion. Lex also redresses the criticism of the Duke Womens Lacrosse team - because they stood up for the boys. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Neptunus Lex takes down one of the complete idiots that somehow connects the shooter with American foreign policy. Simply put, when you hate Bush as much as the left does, common sense is not involved with any type of discussion. Lex also redresses the criticism of the Duke Womens Lacrosse team &#8211; because they stood up for the boys. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max Damage</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2007/04/17/the-larger-issues/comment-page-1/#comment-70853</link>
		<dc:creator>Max Damage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 04:45:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/2007/04/17/the-larger-issues/#comment-70853</guid>
		<description>Unkawill brings up a valid point, we officially sanction a number of -ism&#039;s in our laws.

Racisism - affirmative action.  Sexism - same, even though women are 51% of the population.  Ageism: commercial pilots are required to retire at age 60.  Wealthism - progressive income taxation.

That these laws were brought about in the hopes of righting past wrong, spreading equality, spreading inequity, or just playing to the least common denominator makes no difference - in the end they serve to classify us not as the individuals we are but as members of a convenient group to be categorized, quantified, and coddled in proportion to extract the female vote, the black vote, the hispanic vote, or the evangelical vote.  If it looks like a divide and conquer tactic, it&#039;s because it is.

The last thing I suspect anybody wants is an unruly group of individuals not easily divided into groups.  That would lead to things like Constitutional Republics where every vote must be earned.  I do not think the use of the word &quot;democracy&quot; to describe the USA and this trend towards categorization are unrelated.

And hence the news cycle peddles their cause du-jour, content that if they write it properly they can seek favor with the group they identify with.  Never mind facts, folks -- here&#039;s how it affects *you*.

  - Max</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unkawill brings up a valid point, we officially sanction a number of -ism&#8217;s in our laws.</p>
<p>Racisism &#8211; affirmative action.  Sexism &#8211; same, even though women are 51% of the population.  Ageism: commercial pilots are required to retire at age 60.  Wealthism &#8211; progressive income taxation.</p>
<p>That these laws were brought about in the hopes of righting past wrong, spreading equality, spreading inequity, or just playing to the least common denominator makes no difference &#8211; in the end they serve to classify us not as the individuals we are but as members of a convenient group to be categorized, quantified, and coddled in proportion to extract the female vote, the black vote, the hispanic vote, or the evangelical vote.  If it looks like a divide and conquer tactic, it&#8217;s because it is.</p>
<p>The last thing I suspect anybody wants is an unruly group of individuals not easily divided into groups.  That would lead to things like Constitutional Republics where every vote must be earned.  I do not think the use of the word &#8220;democracy&#8221; to describe the USA and this trend towards categorization are unrelated.</p>
<p>And hence the news cycle peddles their cause du-jour, content that if they write it properly they can seek favor with the group they identify with.  Never mind facts, folks &#8212; here&#8217;s how it affects *you*.</p>
<p>  &#8211; Max</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: unkawill</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2007/04/17/the-larger-issues/comment-page-1/#comment-70838</link>
		<dc:creator>unkawill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 03:03:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/2007/04/17/the-larger-issues/#comment-70838</guid>
		<description>Ben, being a racist is not illegal, it is in fact an integral government policy, ie Affirmative Action.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ben, being a racist is not illegal, it is in fact an integral government policy, ie Affirmative Action.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Therapist1</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2007/04/17/the-larger-issues/comment-page-1/#comment-70767</link>
		<dc:creator>Therapist1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 21:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/2007/04/17/the-larger-issues/#comment-70767</guid>
		<description>Well said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CPT J</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2007/04/17/the-larger-issues/comment-page-1/#comment-70697</link>
		<dc:creator>CPT J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 16:31:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/2007/04/17/the-larger-issues/#comment-70697</guid>
		<description>What Max said --twice.

Have you noticed on network TV how the &quot;talking heads&quot; all rapidfire talk at once, like the 3 Stooges trying to get through a narrow doorway at the same time? How they all talk at the camera, and not to each other? How its way beyond even the rudeness of not letting each other finish before speaking. It isn&#039;t even interruption of a conversation anymore. Because there is no conversation, just a simultaneous bias and emotion dump that has to be completed before the station break.  
Team Tourrette&#039;s Syndrome.

Melville said that &quot;God&#039;s one and only voice is silence.&quot; May the grieving families find their sanctuary away from media ghouls.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What Max said &#8211;twice.</p>
<p>Have you noticed on network TV how the &#8220;talking heads&#8221; all rapidfire talk at once, like the 3 Stooges trying to get through a narrow doorway at the same time? How they all talk at the camera, and not to each other? How its way beyond even the rudeness of not letting each other finish before speaking. It isn&#8217;t even interruption of a conversation anymore. Because there is no conversation, just a simultaneous bias and emotion dump that has to be completed before the station break.<br />
Team Tourrette&#8217;s Syndrome.</p>
<p>Melville said that &#8220;God&#8217;s one and only voice is silence.&#8221; May the grieving families find their sanctuary away from media ghouls.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EJ Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2007/04/17/the-larger-issues/comment-page-1/#comment-70684</link>
		<dc:creator>EJ Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 15:50:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/2007/04/17/the-larger-issues/#comment-70684</guid>
		<description>As soon as I heard the tragedy, I remarked to a co-worker that the floodgates would be opened for the anti-gun lobby and that the tragedy would take a back seat to it.

I feel sorry for the parents, of these kids, I&#039;ve been calling them kids from the start, they must certainly have a hole in their heart that will never be filled again, as you said earlier.

RIP.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As soon as I heard the tragedy, I remarked to a co-worker that the floodgates would be opened for the anti-gun lobby and that the tragedy would take a back seat to it.</p>
<p>I feel sorry for the parents, of these kids, I&#8217;ve been calling them kids from the start, they must certainly have a hole in their heart that will never be filled again, as you said earlier.</p>
<p>RIP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
