Hot Mic

Omakase

Amazon Search

Manning the “Long War”

In the Weekly Standard, AEI Analyst Tom Donnely asks the five questions which ought to drive our military strategy as we troop up for a “Long War.”

What is the mission?
What kind of war?
What kind of force?
How much is enough?
What will it cost?

It’s a good read, and these are all good questions to ask if a civilization intends to play an active role in its own survival in the face of an implacably hostile threat. The alternative of course is to pull in horns, re-deploy to garrison and hope for the best – which increasingly seems to be the mood of the country going into a national election.

But hope is not a strategy.

Share

4 comments to Manning the “Long War”

  • Grumpy

    Good article and it is well written. The problem is the timing, why wasn’t it written sooner? The timing undercuts the whole issue. The article takes essential military issues and makes them political. My question comes from your title, “Manning the ‘Long War’”. I came out of the Viet Nam era, I hope we don’t find ourselves in that type of situation again. Just how long is long?

    Lex, I want you to know, this is not about you. It is about Tom Donnely. This is a well written article on important issues, but it reminds me of fish. On the day of the catch, fine, but on the third or the fourth day, the fish take on a whole new life. Good grief, the seagulls won’t even touch them. These issues written in this format have good content. The timing is all wrong.

    Grumpy

  • lex

    Grumpy – how long is “long” is exactly the right question to ask, and it devolves in part against the other questions Donnely asks – what mission, what force, what war?

    I don’t think anybody wants to be in a position two or three years down track counting another 700-800 battle deaths in Iraq, but it’s safe to say that no one anticipated we’d still be doing that 4 years after decapitating the regime. Still, the question Donnely clearly pre-supposes is that this is a fight worth fighting. Public opinion seems increasingly to thing, “No.”

    For my own part, I disagree, but only because I think that – bad as things have been – they can still get much worse.

  • Byron Audler

    Forgot to ask one question: What will it cost to LOSE the freakin’ war. You can ask all of those other questions later.

  • Ben

    Yes, things can get much worst, and forgive me for being a realist but I believe that they will. First of all I don’t believe we have the political will to finish this correctly nor the time. Indeed I’ve given up on this war being managed correctly, especially as its an election year coming up. Not just any election either, the “Bush” is gone one. So as a result whoever becomes our next president, Republican or Democrat will want to look like the good guy when it comes to Iraq.

    So what does this mean for the so called war on terror? It means for at Iraq at least the dragging of feet, and the lack of will needed to finish this right. Without a doubt mistakes were made, some of them having tarnished the image of America and the faith an average American has in his government. Those questions are questions that should of been asked and answered to the best of their knowledge before we invaded Iraq. Now we can only ask “What now?” and “What are the total costs, and did we get anything in return?”

eXTReMe Tracker

View My Stats