<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pics on the &#8216;net</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neptunuslex.com/2007/06/03/pics-on-the-net/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2007/06/03/pics-on-the-net/</link>
	<description>The unbearable lightness of Lex. Enjoy!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:43:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: HomefrontSix</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2007/06/03/pics-on-the-net/comment-page-1/#comment-82655</link>
		<dc:creator>HomefrontSix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 16:55:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/2007/06/03/pics-on-the-net/#comment-82655</guid>
		<description>Amen Tom.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amen Tom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom G.</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2007/06/03/pics-on-the-net/comment-page-1/#comment-82654</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom G.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 16:54:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/2007/06/03/pics-on-the-net/#comment-82654</guid>
		<description>Not just any G.I....that&#039;s an 82D Airborne Division Paratrooper...God love&#039;em all...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not just any G.I&#8230;.that&#8217;s an 82D Airborne Division Paratrooper&#8230;God love&#8217;em all&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Casca</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2007/06/03/pics-on-the-net/comment-page-1/#comment-82643</link>
		<dc:creator>Casca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 15:33:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/2007/06/03/pics-on-the-net/#comment-82643</guid>
		<description>So, whadaya mean?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, whadaya mean?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justthisguy</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2007/06/03/pics-on-the-net/comment-page-1/#comment-82584</link>
		<dc:creator>Justthisguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 04:33:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/2007/06/03/pics-on-the-net/#comment-82584</guid>
		<description>Oh, yeah, Homefront. I agree with Confucius that the first thing you do when starting to talk about something is to call things by their right names.  Otherwise, you quite literally don&#039;t know what you&#039;re talking about.

(Well, maybe you think you do, but the guy you&#039;re talking to might not know what you mean.)

Or even worse, *you* might not know what you mean.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, yeah, Homefront. I agree with Confucius that the first thing you do when starting to talk about something is to call things by their right names.  Otherwise, you quite literally don&#8217;t know what you&#8217;re talking about.</p>
<p>(Well, maybe you think you do, but the guy you&#8217;re talking to might not know what you mean.)</p>
<p>Or even worse, *you* might not know what you mean.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HomefrontSix</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2007/06/03/pics-on-the-net/comment-page-1/#comment-82579</link>
		<dc:creator>HomefrontSix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 04:06:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/2007/06/03/pics-on-the-net/#comment-82579</guid>
		<description>JTG ~ did you make it far enough to get to Rich&#039;s arguments? His were great (as usual).


What drove me nuts (it obviously doesn&#039;t take much) was that even the people who knew that the soldier was wearing the new uniform didn&#039;t call it by it&#039;s actual name - the Army Combat Uniform (ACU). If you&#039;re going to correct people, at least educate them properly in the process. 

Casca ~ MacGyver loves the Danners but they aren&#039;t approved for wear in the cockpit. I think he has a pair that he wears for field problems and such.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JTG ~ did you make it far enough to get to Rich&#8217;s arguments? His were great (as usual).</p>
<p>What drove me nuts (it obviously doesn&#8217;t take much) was that even the people who knew that the soldier was wearing the new uniform didn&#8217;t call it by it&#8217;s actual name &#8211; the Army Combat Uniform (ACU). If you&#8217;re going to correct people, at least educate them properly in the process. </p>
<p>Casca ~ MacGyver loves the Danners but they aren&#8217;t approved for wear in the cockpit. I think he has a pair that he wears for field problems and such.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justthisguy</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2007/06/03/pics-on-the-net/comment-page-1/#comment-82576</link>
		<dc:creator>Justthisguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 03:51:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/2007/06/03/pics-on-the-net/#comment-82576</guid>
		<description>I made it about halfway down the comments on the PB4H post before I gave up reading. Seemed like the US-soldier-sympathizer types had the &quot;nuanced&quot; arguments, and the objecters were just ranting and foaming.

Hey, I voted for W twice, and the second time I had to grit my teeth, a little, to do it. Screaming little-kid playground-bully arguments really don&#039;t address some of the actual problems I have with the Administration.

We really need to elect Michael Z. Williamson World Dictator, I tell you. He has a plan for the stupid annoying people</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I made it about halfway down the comments on the PB4H post before I gave up reading. Seemed like the US-soldier-sympathizer types had the &#8220;nuanced&#8221; arguments, and the objecters were just ranting and foaming.</p>
<p>Hey, I voted for W twice, and the second time I had to grit my teeth, a little, to do it. Screaming little-kid playground-bully arguments really don&#8217;t address some of the actual problems I have with the Administration.</p>
<p>We really need to elect Michael Z. Williamson World Dictator, I tell you. He has a plan for the stupid annoying people</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

