<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mesopotamian rifle swap</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neptunuslex.com/2007/06/04/mesopotamian-rifle-swap/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2007/06/04/mesopotamian-rifle-swap/</link>
	<description>The unbearable lightness of Lex. Enjoy!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 06:48:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Fuller</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2007/06/04/mesopotamian-rifle-swap/comment-page-1/#comment-84469</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Fuller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jun 2007 16:24:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/2007/06/04/mesopotamian-rifle-swap/#comment-84469</guid>
		<description>As a retired US Army ordnance CW2,I have been involved in many a different testing of small arms and as the brass is stuck on 5.56(cause they all served in Nam IMHO), we have passed on numerous new weapons My fav was a 6mm bullpp design. point and shoot, hard hitting et al. Prob is the light inf runs the army a,d they want light. So there we have it. Tom</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a retired US Army ordnance CW2,I have been involved in many a different testing of small arms and as the brass is stuck on 5.56(cause they all served in Nam IMHO), we have passed on numerous new weapons My fav was a 6mm bullpp design. point and shoot, hard hitting et al. Prob is the light inf runs the army a,d they want light. So there we have it. Tom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LBG</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2007/06/04/mesopotamian-rifle-swap/comment-page-1/#comment-83056</link>
		<dc:creator>LBG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 17:41:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/2007/06/04/mesopotamian-rifle-swap/#comment-83056</guid>
		<description>I read a quote wich I will not get exactly right as the book is not in front of me.  I was reading &quot;Learning to Eat Soup with a Knife,&quot; and he said something to the effect of, &quot;The army gets the weapons the civlian leadership wants them to have.&quot;  Very important as it speaks to the politics of Congressional district support and factory/job availability.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read a quote wich I will not get exactly right as the book is not in front of me.  I was reading &#8220;Learning to Eat Soup with a Knife,&#8221; and he said something to the effect of, &#8220;The army gets the weapons the civlian leadership wants them to have.&#8221;  Very important as it speaks to the politics of Congressional district support and factory/job availability.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Casca</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2007/06/04/mesopotamian-rifle-swap/comment-page-1/#comment-83015</link>
		<dc:creator>Casca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 15:56:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/2007/06/04/mesopotamian-rifle-swap/#comment-83015</guid>
		<description>And unlikely to boot.

I suspect the unsatisfactory situation of not having a great weapon vice a satisfactory weapon is more the product of the politics of the procurement process.

I used to own an &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heckler_&amp;_Koch_G3&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;HK-91 or G3 military variant.&lt;/a&gt;  It&#039;s an exceptional weapon, but heavy.  Heavy enough to butt-stroke with, which is a desired trait, sturdy too.  I&#039;m just happy that the house booted the Army&#039;s latest request to buy a couple million more M-4&#039;s back in their faces, and told them to look for a better product.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And unlikely to boot.</p>
<p>I suspect the unsatisfactory situation of not having a great weapon vice a satisfactory weapon is more the product of the politics of the procurement process.</p>
<p>I used to own an <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heckler_&amp;_Koch_G3" rel="nofollow">HK-91 or G3 military variant.</a>  It&#8217;s an exceptional weapon, but heavy.  Heavy enough to butt-stroke with, which is a desired trait, sturdy too.  I&#8217;m just happy that the house booted the Army&#8217;s latest request to buy a couple million more M-4&#8242;s back in their faces, and told them to look for a better product.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: badbob</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2007/06/04/mesopotamian-rifle-swap/comment-page-1/#comment-83002</link>
		<dc:creator>badbob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 15:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/2007/06/04/mesopotamian-rifle-swap/#comment-83002</guid>
		<description>Casca,

re- &quot;Bob, your solutions leave something to be desired, and probably account for why we don?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Casca,</p>
<p>re- &#8220;Bob, your solutions leave something to be desired, and probably account for why we don?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: badbob</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2007/06/04/mesopotamian-rifle-swap/comment-page-1/#comment-410180</link>
		<dc:creator>badbob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 15:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/2007/06/04/mesopotamian-rifle-swap/#comment-410180</guid>
		<description>Casca,

re- &quot;Bob, your solutions leave something to be desired, and probably account for why we don’t bring sailors into this decision making process&quot;

Well thanks. And that kind of blinders on, bullet-headed, vertical-only illogic is probably the reason why our ground forces(incl USMC) haven&#039;t developed a new combat infantry rifle since 1960 or thereabouts! With the exception of some new M-16 derivatives over the years and that new semi auto sniper rifle o&#039;course. You&#039;d of figured with those hopped up Muhj-MFs our guys are facing we could field something faster.

H-K is only a friggin brand.  Sorta funny a Jar would advocate a SEAL weapon.  BWTFDIK?  Being an ex rust-picking varmint hunter and all... 

Look. I won&#039;t mention ballistics or rifles, if&#039;n you quit commenting on air power....Nah, that wouldn&#039;t be any fun.

b2</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Casca,</p>
<p>re- &#8220;Bob, your solutions leave something to be desired, and probably account for why we don’t bring sailors into this decision making process&#8221;</p>
<p>Well thanks. And that kind of blinders on, bullet-headed, vertical-only illogic is probably the reason why our ground forces(incl USMC) haven&#8217;t developed a new combat infantry rifle since 1960 or thereabouts! With the exception of some new M-16 derivatives over the years and that new semi auto sniper rifle o&#8217;course. You&#8217;d of figured with those hopped up Muhj-MFs our guys are facing we could field something faster.</p>
<p>H-K is only a friggin brand.  Sorta funny a Jar would advocate a SEAL weapon.  BWTFDIK?  Being an ex rust-picking varmint hunter and all&#8230; </p>
<p>Look. I won&#8217;t mention ballistics or rifles, if&#8217;n you quit commenting on air power&#8230;.Nah, that wouldn&#8217;t be any fun.</p>
<p>b2</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Casca</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2007/06/04/mesopotamian-rifle-swap/comment-page-1/#comment-82990</link>
		<dc:creator>Casca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 14:25:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/2007/06/04/mesopotamian-rifle-swap/#comment-82990</guid>
		<description>So Therapist, in your world, I guess you&#039;d say that, &quot;size does matter.&quot;  LMAO, I couldn&#039;t resist.

Bob, your solutions leave something to be desired, and probably account for why we don&#039;t bring sailors into this decision making process.  Heh, we don&#039;t tell you how to drive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So Therapist, in your world, I guess you&#8217;d say that, &#8220;size does matter.&#8221;  LMAO, I couldn&#8217;t resist.</p>
<p>Bob, your solutions leave something to be desired, and probably account for why we don&#8217;t bring sailors into this decision making process.  Heh, we don&#8217;t tell you how to drive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

