Hot Mic

  • Grumpy: Is that, "Outstanding" or a "Real Stand Out"? Now, I might be 60 years old and I...
  • Steeljaw Scribe: Oh the horror -- think of the krill! The millions (billions even!)of poor krill...
  • Skippy-san: No, that's not it. But if she is leaving politics-well then that's something to ...
  • Buck: Happy Independence Day to you and yours, Cap'n, and to the commentariat Chez Lex...
  • Buck: It is to dream, but... I'm thinking we should randomly select three Minutemen fr...
  • Hogday: Happy Birthday America and, from me, a special thanks to you for being there and...
  • Edward: Happy Birthday, America! The last and greatest hope for all mankind. I pray th...
  • Marianne Matthews: I think Todd "Fists of Fury" Palin had something to do with her decision to resi...
  • lex: Bitch had it coming, is that it?
  • Bruce Jones: No disrespect to the occasion; I read this and thought "Is this one of those Bud...

Sponsors

That “resilient” threat

A few years back – before the latest brawl – I ran a detachment of 6 FA-18’s, 2 Tomcats, an S-3 and an E-2C ashore in Kuwait. It was a regional “engagement” exercise, designed to cement our relationship with our allies.

The Kuwaitis had bought for themselves – a requirement from which the US Navy profited – new lot FA-18’s with upgraded engines. Much higher thrust-to-weight than the installed engines we had used up to that point. If you’re flying an FA-18C after a certain lot, you can thank the Emir for the extra oopmh.

Good deal all the way around. Win-win.

This was the first exercise of the type that we had executed ashore. Previous hacks had been fought from the ship. Our Hornets had up to that point been loaded for wartime ops: Five pylons, two drop tanks and they’d had to come back with half their internal gas to land aboard ship. The Kuwaitis had flown their machines slicked off, or nearly, and planned to land at around 20% internal fuel. With their higher performance engines. It mattered.

Over the course of the preceding years, they’d pretty much had the US Navy for lunch. They’d taken to boasting.

When I took the detachment ashore I insisted that our maintenance folks bring us down to a single tank, and take two wing pylons down. I knew that – enhanced engines or not – with our higher state of training, we’d be OK in anything like a fair fight. It wasn’t like we were cheating: In a pinch, with your life riding on it, you’d blow the wings clean if you had to. Jettison everything you could that wasn’t part of the solution. The configuration I’d asked for was a good simulation from a drag count perspective.

The Kuwaitis were good pilots, by and large. One of them I flew against – his callsign was “Flash” – was excellent in fact, and he had rock solid reasons to detest the Saddamite regime. Another story.

He was one of the top 10 or 12 guys I’d ever flown against. (It’s worth pointing out that, having served as TOPGUN instructor, I’ve flown against the very best our country has to offer. I know from good.) The Kuwaitis were nevertheless surprised when they came up against our underpowered jets in a similar configuration. It wasn’t about having us for lunch anymore. It was about surviving. Or, failing that, keeping “face.”

They’re proud, the desert Arabs. They live in a difficult environment. Proud men indeed.

CAG objected at first, when he heard about my plan to even out the fight. He wanted to keep the jets ready for combat ops, fully loaded with external stores and pylons. I told him that it was important for our allies to understand that we were strong. That we were worthwhile friends. That we were tough competitors. That we couldn’t be beat.

They had to understand that, if it came down to it? That they couldn’t win.

It wasn’t easy for them. With their more powerful engines, they were really good at 1v1, but our training leveled the field. The weren’t bad at 2v2, but we were better. We ran wild when the numbers got bigger than that. They are rich men, but ours is a rich country. We surprised them.

You’d have maybe smiled to hear them talk, coming back from the aerial brawls. To see the sudden doubt come in their eyes, these proud men, these lions of the desert. They were used to winning, but things hadn’t turned out they way they were used to.

They had to reconsider.

Jules has the story of a meeting engagement between 9 US soldiers in two HMMWV’s and 40-odd al Qaeda jihadists – goombahs described by the AP as “resilient.”

There were so damned resilient that by the time it was all sorted out 35 of them were ticking down to room temperature and seven were wearing zip ties.

Two US soldiers lost their lives over a 23-hour battle – it matters because we actually care about our folks. Nor are we going to “win” through kill ratios.

Don’t mean to be dismissive, but more “resilience” like that and the bad guys might as well be sitting in the garage running tubes from the exhaust pipe into the passenger cabin. Get it over with.

Fighting an insurgency you win by not losing.

Flip side of that coin?

You can’t win by losing. Every time there’s a stand-up fight they get their a**es kicked.

These too, might have to reconsider.

10 comments to That “resilient” threat

  • 1
    GEO6 says:

    Tried the link. Nadda.

  • 2
    lex says:

    Link fixed, sorry.

  • 3
    badbob says:

    I went through jet training with some of those Kuwaiti’s long before GW1 when they flew A-4’s. Everyone of ‘em was rich and drove a TransAM or Firebird with the biggest engine available! They were OK and added to that experience that was Pensacola in those days.

    What I remember was real good VFR pilots and they drank booze. I’m sure 90-91′ made ‘em even better pilots or at least more serious.

    b2

  • 4
    P-3W says:

    I’m just glad that our training and people could overcome their advantages in hardware and their arrogance.

    You had it right, Lex. You have to prove that we are unbeatable when we don’t deliberately hobble ourselves. Forcing them to reconsider and reevaluate, priceless.

    Teh smackdown, it feels good sometimes.

  • 5
    Grumpy says:

    Lex, I’m a little slow. In your next to last paragraph, you write, “Every time there’s a stand-up fight they get their a**es kicked.” If I understand you, you are saying, The Cause of Death: Traumatic Brain Injury.” Did I understand you correctly? Have a good day, Grumpy.

    PS. Well, what do you expect from us dumb old vets?

  • 6
    Gray says:

    Lex,

    With all due respect, at this juncture its not about whether “Every time there?

  • 7
    CPT J says:

    Arabs traditionally respect and follow the “Strong Horse”

    Guess they found out that ‘ol Yankee Strong Horse’ll stomp ya if you get too close.

    So be smart and be nice to the Strong Horse

  • 8
    Justthisguy says:

    Kewl&Manly, or as Neil Stephenson put it in Cryptonomicon, we’re all stupendous badasses, descended from the winners of fights (and things which sound like fights) going all the way back to the first bacteria.

    Doesn’t hurt to arm-wrestle and prove it from time to time. (so to speak)

  • 9
    Zane says:

    Lex, just remember that golden BB, or Colonel Toom. There’s always one in that crowd of idjits who understands what’s going on. Because I’ve seen it happen, and seen the little birds shot to shit and the blood hosed out. Night after night, no resistance, or resistance quickly dispatched to its eternal reward. And then, one night, someone understands cover, how we move, who goes where first. Yeah, he goes to his reward, too, but not without taking a few of us with him. Beware that one, and don’t gloat over the masses of dead idjits.

    Besides, after five years, there still are plenty of idjits willing to mass and meet us toe to toe. Where the Hell do they keep coming from?

  • 10
    Skippy-san says:

    As I recall, Tomcats never had the single bubble vs double bubble discussion. Probably because it was a superior machine. :-)

Leave a Reply

 

 

 

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

eXTReMe Tracker

View My Stats