Hot Mic

  • Quartermaster: I'll "pile on" here. Good writing Lex, and an excellent approach to a vexing pro...
  • Bou: She was built to turn. I'm at a loss to those who think she wasn't. Her turning...
  • virgil xenophon: Boy, you nailed it, Edward. You know, I should have added in my reply to Curtis ...
  • virgil xenophon: Third in line, here, to concur that such vignettes are one of Lex's fortes'--and...
  • Mike M.: Concur. This is the sort of thing that is useful for a GA pilot...although I'll...
  • Grumpy: As I read all about this, I was thinking more in the sense of going "Postal". It...
  • Ron Snyder: Just wondering, are Flit and Skippy political soulmates or what?
  • John: So, will you submit this to the AOPA magazine or similar general aviation magaz...
  • Grumpy: Is that, "Outstanding" or a "Real Stand Out"? Now, I might be 60 years old and I...
  • Steeljaw Scribe: Oh the horror -- think of the krill! The millions (billions even!)of poor krill...

Sponsors

Staying on message

Once you’ve committed yourself – and I mean committed like the pig is committed to your bacon and eggs breakfast – to military defeat, national humiliation, diplomatic retreat and the abandonment of millions of people who trusted you in a strategically critical portion of the world to genocidal levels of violence, well: It can be pretty hard to contemplate the alternative. And since the surge is showing signs of (thankfully uneven) progress, well. Let’s just say it’s time to shoot the messenger:

Congressional Democrats are trying to undermine U.S. Army Gen. David H. Petraeus’ credibility before he delivers a report on the Iraq war next week, saying the general is a mouthpiece for President Bush and his findings can’t be trusted.

“The Bush report?” Senate Majority Whip Richard J. Durbin said when asked about the upcoming report from Gen. Petraeus, U.S. commander in Iraq.

“We know what is going to be in it. It’s clear. I think the president’s trip over to Iraq makes it very obvious,” the Illinois Democrat said. “I expect the Bush report to say, ‘The surge is working. Let’s have more of the same.’ “

General Petraeus, you will recall, was unanimously confirmed to his position by the Senate in an 81-0 vote (with 19 senators not voting).

But that was back in, like, January. Before all of this surge stuff had even happened. The idea of the general even partially pulling it off was all so very theoretical back then. I mean the war was over. We’d lost.

Good days. Salad days.

Poor General Petraeus. He carries the hopes of so many people on his shoulders, for better or for worse. Most Americans and nearly 25 million Iraqis hope that he can bring the kind of stability to that shattered land that will enable a political accommodation, if not reconciliation. Or at least stop the bleeding for a while until things can be more or less sorted out.

Other folks at least have the courtesy to admit that positive news would be bad for them. For those folks, it’s really going to be important to stay on message. I’m talking discipline. No more of your Brian Baird cross-overs. Not if you’re really committed to losing this thing.

Oh, yeah: And plug your ears.

That’ll help too.

1 comment to Staying on message

  • 1
    Byron says:

    Are you saying you’re going to rip Lex’s carefully crafted wordsmithing? Looks like you’re site sells packaged speeches to who ever has the coin. Sorta bad taste if’n you do…

Leave a Reply

 

 

 

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

eXTReMe Tracker

View My Stats