<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Double take</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neptunuslex.com/2007/09/16/double-take-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2007/09/16/double-take-2/</link>
	<description>The unbearable lightness of Lex. Enjoy!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 04:54:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Parkes</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2007/09/16/double-take-2/comment-page-1/#comment-413370</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Parkes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 03:46:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/2007/09/16/double-take-2/#comment-413370</guid>
		<description>Ozwitch is quite right.  This sort of surgery can be paid for under Medicare for ordinary Australian citizens if it&#039;s clinically justifiable.  Ain&#039;t socialised health care grand?  Defence force personnel aren&#039;t entitled to claim Medicare, as all their medical expenses are picked up by the ADF - so why should they be disadvantaged?  I bet you Defence has paid for a few nose jobs over the years for the same reason without the brouhaha.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ozwitch is quite right.  This sort of surgery can be paid for under Medicare for ordinary Australian citizens if it&#8217;s clinically justifiable.  Ain&#8217;t socialised health care grand?  Defence force personnel aren&#8217;t entitled to claim Medicare, as all their medical expenses are picked up by the ADF &#8211; so why should they be disadvantaged?  I bet you Defence has paid for a few nose jobs over the years for the same reason without the brouhaha.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sim</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2007/09/16/double-take-2/comment-page-1/#comment-413371</link>
		<dc:creator>Sim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 03:04:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/2007/09/16/double-take-2/#comment-413371</guid>
		<description>FBL-

You miss the point, that being if it&#039;s for &quot;psychological reasons&quot; you qualify for the Govt. cheese anyway, no need to join the Navy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FBL-</p>
<p>You miss the point, that being if it&#8217;s for &#8220;psychological reasons&#8221; you qualify for the Govt. cheese anyway, no need to join the Navy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FbL</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2007/09/16/double-take-2/comment-page-1/#comment-413372</link>
		<dc:creator>FbL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 00:41:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/2007/09/16/double-take-2/#comment-413372</guid>
		<description>Ozwitch, 

As I recall, women who get plastic surgery (including breast augmentation) are MORE likely to suffer from self-esteem and show little/no improvement after surgery.  So, doing this for &quot;self-esteem issues&quot; is a pretty pathetic reason.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ozwitch, </p>
<p>As I recall, women who get plastic surgery (including breast augmentation) are MORE likely to suffer from self-esteem and show little/no improvement after surgery.  So, doing this for &#8220;self-esteem issues&#8221; is a pretty pathetic reason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ozwitch</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2007/09/16/double-take-2/comment-page-1/#comment-413373</link>
		<dc:creator>Ozwitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 00:07:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/2007/09/16/double-take-2/#comment-413373</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a little confused by all the fuss. You can get breast augmentation done under Medicare if it&#039;s for self-esteem issues, in which case the government i.e. the taxpayer, pays for it anyway. So what&#039;s the issue? 
If the two girls involved were not military, but simply civilians women in any other government organisation, nobody would have turned a hair. Do people think that military officers should be, what, ABOVE that sort of thing? It&#039;s all a waste of resources, and why aren&#039;t they tough enough to ignore issues of self-esteem etc. 
But I suspect the main reason for the story is that it gets the words breasts and women in uniform into the same sentence.
Seems we haven&#039;t come far from the equal pay, equal rank fuss of the 1970s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a little confused by all the fuss. You can get breast augmentation done under Medicare if it&#8217;s for self-esteem issues, in which case the government i.e. the taxpayer, pays for it anyway. So what&#8217;s the issue?<br />
If the two girls involved were not military, but simply civilians women in any other government organisation, nobody would have turned a hair. Do people think that military officers should be, what, ABOVE that sort of thing? It&#8217;s all a waste of resources, and why aren&#8217;t they tough enough to ignore issues of self-esteem etc.<br />
But I suspect the main reason for the story is that it gets the words breasts and women in uniform into the same sentence.<br />
Seems we haven&#8217;t come far from the equal pay, equal rank fuss of the 1970s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ymarsakar</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2007/09/16/double-take-2/comment-page-1/#comment-413374</link>
		<dc:creator>Ymarsakar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Sep 2007 23:07:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/2007/09/16/double-take-2/#comment-413374</guid>
		<description>Was it the Belgians or the Swiss or something that CDR Salamander showed a youtube video of, when they flashed American sailors leaving? Ya think the Australians...?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was it the Belgians or the Swiss or something that CDR Salamander showed a youtube video of, when they flashed American sailors leaving? Ya think the Australians&#8230;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MajHarvey</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2007/09/16/double-take-2/comment-page-1/#comment-413375</link>
		<dc:creator>MajHarvey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Sep 2007 21:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/2007/09/16/double-take-2/#comment-413375</guid>
		<description>Far be it from me to engage in a tit-for-tat on this august blog - and yes, I can already hear the tittering from the peanut gallery.  Better get this puppy back under wraps before it bounces out of control.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Far be it from me to engage in a tit-for-tat on this august blog &#8211; and yes, I can already hear the tittering from the peanut gallery.  Better get this puppy back under wraps before it bounces out of control.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

