<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Back to the future</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neptunuslex.com/2007/09/22/back-to-the-future/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2007/09/22/back-to-the-future/</link>
	<description>The unbearable lightness of Lex. Enjoy!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 08:10:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raging Mom</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2007/09/22/back-to-the-future/comment-page-1/#comment-413975</link>
		<dc:creator>Raging Mom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 15:10:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/2007/09/22/back-to-the-future/#comment-413975</guid>
		<description>Note to Lee: I believe the officer from McHale&#039;s Navy you were refering to was Captain Wallace Binghampton!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Note to Lee: I believe the officer from McHale&#8217;s Navy you were refering to was Captain Wallace Binghampton!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2007/09/22/back-to-the-future/comment-page-1/#comment-413974</link>
		<dc:creator>steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 12:37:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/2007/09/22/back-to-the-future/#comment-413974</guid>
		<description>Why mess with the dungaree uniform?  We went through that @#$%% in 1973.  You just have to admire USMC for sticking with what is theirs.
cpo ret.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why mess with the dungaree uniform?  We went through that @#$%% in 1973.  You just have to admire USMC for sticking with what is theirs.<br />
cpo ret.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kris, in New England</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2007/09/22/back-to-the-future/comment-page-1/#comment-413973</link>
		<dc:creator>Kris, in New England</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 12:19:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/2007/09/22/back-to-the-future/#comment-413973</guid>
		<description>Um, sorry, but whatever you all say about them - it is &lt;em&gt;ahem&lt;/em&gt; men in uniform.

You guys might not like them (and for reasons that certainly seem justified), but...some of us have no problem with it, no matter what it looks like.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um, sorry, but whatever you all say about them &#8211; it is <em>ahem</em> men in uniform.</p>
<p>You guys might not like them (and for reasons that certainly seem justified), but&#8230;some of us have no problem with it, no matter what it looks like.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deBarra</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2007/09/22/back-to-the-future/comment-page-1/#comment-413972</link>
		<dc:creator>deBarra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 10:39:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/2007/09/22/back-to-the-future/#comment-413972</guid>
		<description>They&#039;ll make it fire retardant - for 20 dry cleanings, that is. After that, you need to buy a new set to be safe aboard ship. (Keeps the uniform manufacturers and dry cleaners in business.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They&#8217;ll make it fire retardant &#8211; for 20 dry cleanings, that is. After that, you need to buy a new set to be safe aboard ship. (Keeps the uniform manufacturers and dry cleaners in business.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chap</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2007/09/22/back-to-the-future/comment-page-1/#comment-413971</link>
		<dc:creator>Chap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 05:31:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/2007/09/22/back-to-the-future/#comment-413971</guid>
		<description>Ah, yes, one more thing.

Is this still made of fabric that, if worn to a fire, will melt on the human under it?

I mean, not that there&#039;ve never been shipboard FIRES or anything, much less any fires in, say, the Pentagon...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, yes, one more thing.</p>
<p>Is this still made of fabric that, if worn to a fire, will melt on the human under it?</p>
<p>I mean, not that there&#8217;ve never been shipboard FIRES or anything, much less any fires in, say, the Pentagon&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maddog1989</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2007/09/22/back-to-the-future/comment-page-1/#comment-413970</link>
		<dc:creator>Maddog1989</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2007 22:03:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/2007/09/22/back-to-the-future/#comment-413970</guid>
		<description>As a Marine Aviator who just got a picture in &quot;greens&quot; it is great to see you swabbies still envious of traditional uniforms we never let go- and Mike M- we just re-armed our watches aboard my station- and the sight of JOs with sidearms does indeed make one think our leadership is serious about this being a fight...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a Marine Aviator who just got a picture in &#8220;greens&#8221; it is great to see you swabbies still envious of traditional uniforms we never let go- and Mike M- we just re-armed our watches aboard my station- and the sight of JOs with sidearms does indeed make one think our leadership is serious about this being a fight&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
