<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hard to understand</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neptunuslex.com/2007/11/15/hard-to-understand/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2007/11/15/hard-to-understand/</link>
	<description>The unbearable lightness of Lex. Enjoy!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 04:54:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snake Eater</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2007/11/15/hard-to-understand/comment-page-1/#comment-417387</link>
		<dc:creator>Snake Eater</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2007 21:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/2007/11/15/hard-to-understand/#comment-417387</guid>
		<description>Roachman &amp; Maj Mike... I have the honor to inform you that you have both been selcted as finalists  for the 2007&quot; Mickey the Dunce Award&quot; as  obvious fans of all things Boston I&#039;m sure you&#039;re aware  of the exhaulted status this award brings to it&#039;s recipient...I&#039;ll keep you posted.  Best</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roachman &amp; Maj Mike&#8230; I have the honor to inform you that you have both been selcted as finalists  for the 2007&#8243; Mickey the Dunce Award&#8221; as  obvious fans of all things Boston I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;re aware  of the exhaulted status this award brings to it&#8217;s recipient&#8230;I&#8217;ll keep you posted.  Best</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grumpy</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2007/11/15/hard-to-understand/comment-page-1/#comment-417386</link>
		<dc:creator>Grumpy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 22:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/2007/11/15/hard-to-understand/#comment-417386</guid>
		<description>Hi Everybody, Wow, what a discussion! As I read, I  noticed the &quot;wisdom&quot; of an old Phart. This was really true, when he spoke of &quot;not painting with a broad brush.&quot; I guess I&#039;m just a little slow. But as I look at it, it doesn&#039;t make sense. It is true, I do NOT know the name, age or gender of the individual who was working at the poll. But for the sake of this discussion and appropriateness of this blog (Man, does this leave me a great deal of latitude.) We&#039;ll call that particular poll worker who complained by the name of &quot;X&quot;. Let&#039;s begin, &quot;X&quot; sees the Boy Scouts setting up for their drive. Then &quot;X&quot; makes a formal complaint, does &quot;X&quot; go back into the roll of a &quot;poll worker&quot;? &quot;X&quot; is permitted to have political views, but is NOT permitted to express them within a certain area around the polls.

But let&#039;s go slow as we begin to talk about all of the issues. Terms mean a great deal, especially in the ruthless context of history. History is our teacher.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Everybody, Wow, what a discussion! As I read, I  noticed the &#8220;wisdom&#8221; of an old Phart. This was really true, when he spoke of &#8220;not painting with a broad brush.&#8221; I guess I&#8217;m just a little slow. But as I look at it, it doesn&#8217;t make sense. It is true, I do NOT know the name, age or gender of the individual who was working at the poll. But for the sake of this discussion and appropriateness of this blog (Man, does this leave me a great deal of latitude.) We&#8217;ll call that particular poll worker who complained by the name of &#8220;X&#8221;. Let&#8217;s begin, &#8220;X&#8221; sees the Boy Scouts setting up for their drive. Then &#8220;X&#8221; makes a formal complaint, does &#8220;X&#8221; go back into the roll of a &#8220;poll worker&#8221;? &#8220;X&#8221; is permitted to have political views, but is NOT permitted to express them within a certain area around the polls.</p>
<p>But let&#8217;s go slow as we begin to talk about all of the issues. Terms mean a great deal, especially in the ruthless context of history. History is our teacher.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roachman</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2007/11/15/hard-to-understand/comment-page-1/#comment-417385</link>
		<dc:creator>Roachman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 22:27:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/2007/11/15/hard-to-understand/#comment-417385</guid>
		<description>Major Mike,

Well done, Sir!  Comment of the year, for my money.  

Wicked pissah, ya know?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Major Mike,</p>
<p>Well done, Sir!  Comment of the year, for my money.  </p>
<p>Wicked pissah, ya know?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cottus</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2007/11/15/hard-to-understand/comment-page-1/#comment-417375</link>
		<dc:creator>cottus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 20:25:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/2007/11/15/hard-to-understand/#comment-417375</guid>
		<description>Mr. Snake Eater,
With all due respect, forcing oneself to view pictures of Dennis Kucinich [even now typing his name] is cruel and unusual punishment.  Look upon my new Dept of Peace as like a politically correct Shutz Staffle.  Like the originals, professionals from the Dept. of Defense would be encouraged to join the Dept. of Offense at increased rank.  While you will have to, occasionally, order very junior enlisted to remove their &#039;peace&#039; beads, [as I have actually had to do] , you will find that many of the new inductees can eat snakes with the best of &#039;em.   The payoff is when these same now - squared away individuals go back to Cambridge, San Francisco and such.  Just consider it.   

Michelle, sorry I didn&#039;t quite understand that Andromeda thing.  &#039;Peace&#039;, &#039;War&#039;, &#039;Defense&#039;, &#039;Offense&#039; - just words.
All I&#039;m saying is that the really serious problem of hostility to the military and the war on terror would be greatly ameliorated if we would embrace a true citizen soldiery.  Snake Eater, Lex and Co. absolutely hate it because that&#039;s the last thing they need is a bunch of draftees messing with their eminently successful system.

In order to maintain a standing army in a liberal democracy, you gotta take advantage of universal conscription.  I wish the professionals would just suck it up and honor this added mission, not just shuck it off.  Their very survival as an institution, IMHO, depends on it.  And we depend on them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Snake Eater,<br />
With all due respect, forcing oneself to view pictures of Dennis Kucinich [even now typing his name] is cruel and unusual punishment.  Look upon my new Dept of Peace as like a politically correct Shutz Staffle.  Like the originals, professionals from the Dept. of Defense would be encouraged to join the Dept. of Offense at increased rank.  While you will have to, occasionally, order very junior enlisted to remove their &#8216;peace&#8217; beads, [as I have actually had to do] , you will find that many of the new inductees can eat snakes with the best of &#8216;em.   The payoff is when these same now &#8211; squared away individuals go back to Cambridge, San Francisco and such.  Just consider it.   </p>
<p>Michelle, sorry I didn&#8217;t quite understand that Andromeda thing.  &#8216;Peace&#8217;, &#8216;War&#8217;, &#8216;Defense&#8217;, &#8216;Offense&#8217; &#8211; just words.<br />
All I&#8217;m saying is that the really serious problem of hostility to the military and the war on terror would be greatly ameliorated if we would embrace a true citizen soldiery.  Snake Eater, Lex and Co. absolutely hate it because that&#8217;s the last thing they need is a bunch of draftees messing with their eminently successful system.</p>
<p>In order to maintain a standing army in a liberal democracy, you gotta take advantage of universal conscription.  I wish the professionals would just suck it up and honor this added mission, not just shuck it off.  Their very survival as an institution, IMHO, depends on it.  And we depend on them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DaveH</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2007/11/15/hard-to-understand/comment-page-1/#comment-417384</link>
		<dc:creator>DaveH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 18:14:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/2007/11/15/hard-to-understand/#comment-417384</guid>
		<description>Marsha Weinerman:Executive Director

Office Hours:
Cambridge Election Commission
51 Inman Street
First Floor
Cambridge,MA 02139
Phone: (617) 349-4361
Fax: (617) 349-4366
Monday:8:30 a.m. - 8 p.m.
Tuesday to Thursday:8:30 a.m. - 5 p.m.
Friday:8:30 a.m.-Noon

Email to:

Elections2@Cambridgema.gov</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marsha Weinerman:Executive Director</p>
<p>Office Hours:<br />
Cambridge Election Commission<br />
51 Inman Street<br />
First Floor<br />
Cambridge,MA 02139<br />
Phone: (617) 349-4361<br />
Fax: (617) 349-4366<br />
Monday:8:30 a.m. &#8211; 8 p.m.<br />
Tuesday to Thursday:8:30 a.m. &#8211; 5 p.m.<br />
Friday:8:30 a.m.-Noon</p>
<p>Email to:</p>
<p><a href="mailto:Elections2@Cambridgema.gov">Elections2@Cambridgema.gov</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2007/11/15/hard-to-understand/comment-page-1/#comment-417383</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 17:36:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/2007/11/15/hard-to-understand/#comment-417383</guid>
		<description>I was watching an episode of Andromeda last night. 

The one with the kids on the space station who were very anxious to follow the High Guard (which they thought of as some sort of God apparently) and kill their enemies. The Capt was preaching the value of peace and forming alliances to them but I don&#039;t think they were buying it. After a few terse moments where two of the kids acted as suicide bombers and blew up a solar system (hey, don&#039;t blame me, I didn&#039;t write this stuff!) and Dylan had to wrestle control of his ship back from them, I still don&#039;t think they got it. At the end, with the Andromeda gone, they had appointed a new &#039;leader&#039;, who was a pretty good speaker for a 14 year old, who promised to bring &#039;peace&#039; and destruction to all their enemies.

Is that along the same lines as what you&#039;re thinking, cottus?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was watching an episode of Andromeda last night. </p>
<p>The one with the kids on the space station who were very anxious to follow the High Guard (which they thought of as some sort of God apparently) and kill their enemies. The Capt was preaching the value of peace and forming alliances to them but I don&#8217;t think they were buying it. After a few terse moments where two of the kids acted as suicide bombers and blew up a solar system (hey, don&#8217;t blame me, I didn&#8217;t write this stuff!) and Dylan had to wrestle control of his ship back from them, I still don&#8217;t think they got it. At the end, with the Andromeda gone, they had appointed a new &#8216;leader&#8217;, who was a pretty good speaker for a 14 year old, who promised to bring &#8216;peace&#8217; and destruction to all their enemies.</p>
<p>Is that along the same lines as what you&#8217;re thinking, cottus?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

