Having spent the last seven and one half years stuck at the one minute mark of a two-minutes hate, elements of the left-leaning cultural elite have finally realized that it’s pretty hard to put the Hate-Brand
|
|||||
Hot Mic
Bloggers in Arms
BlogrollContinuous WavePaid to BlogReciprocating EnginesSmarter'n MeWingmen
OmakaseAmazon Search |
MarsBy lex, on February 11th, 2008
Having spent the last seven and one half years stuck at the one minute mark of a two-minutes hate, elements of the left-leaning cultural elite have finally realized that it’s pretty hard to put the Hate-Brand 5 comments to Mars |
Targets of Opportunityblog advertising is good for you Credo"Sign on, young man, and sail with me. The stature of our homeland is no more than the measure of ourselves. Our job is to keep her free. Our will is to keep the torch of freedom burning for all. To this solemn purpose we call on the young, the brave, the strong, and the free. Heed my call, Come to the sea. Come Sail with me." -- John Paul Jones "Pardon him, Theodotus; he is a barbarian, and thinks that the customs of his tribe and island are the laws of nature" --George Bernard Shaw, "Caesar and Cleopatra" "And those who were seen dancing were thought to be insane by those who could not hear the music."--Friedrich Nietzsche "A kind Providence has placed in our breasts a hatred of the unjust and cruel, in order that we may preserve ourselves from cruelty and injustice. They who bear cruelty, are accomplices in it. The pretended gentleness which excludes that charitable rancour, produces an indifference which is half an approbation. They never will love where they ought to love, who do not hate where they ought to hate."--Edmund Burke “You say that it is your custom to burn widows. Very well. We also have a custom: when men burn a woman alive, we tie a rope around their necks and we hang them. Build your funeral pyre; beside it, my carpenters will build a gallows. You may follow your custom. And then we will follow ours.”--General Sir Charles Napier "Μολὼν λαβέ" -- Leonidas "Blogito Ergo Sum" -- Neptunus Lex Amazon AssociateFor the Effort!Winnar!![]() Subscribe![]() CategoriesPagesTagsacademy
afghanistan
Araby
Blogging
buffoonery
culture
Defense Industry
economy
Flying
Friday Musings
geopol
Gratuitous slap
GWOT
Headlines
health care
History
iran
iraq
issues
libya
Media
Memory Lane
Military
Navy
norks
Oz
pakistan
piracy
politicians
politics
Politics and Culture
prc
pundits
science
sea stories
silliness
Small Stuff
SoCal
Tech Lust
technology
UAVs
UK
usaf
usmc
weapons
|
|||
|
Copyright © 2012 Neptunus Lex - All Rights Reserved |
|||||

Actually, if you read Krugman’s book ( which I just finished yesterday on the train) he points out that Nixon was one of the first major candidates to exploit peoples fear and use it to their political advantage. He parlayed it into a win in 1968 and much of the spade work had been done by Ronald Reagan in 1966 during his run for California govenor.
I think there is some merit in the idea that Obama supporters just don’t like Hillary. I know I don’t like her-and I can’t stand Bush. So if she is on the ticket for the Dems-there will be no place to go except McCain. Problem with that is that you inherit, in many ways, another 4 years of Bushes policies-which we would all be better off without.
If there is a hate genie to be let out of the bottle-it was the Clintons who did it-no one else. Or perhaps they have just learned it from the Republicans. That’s Krugman’s real point.
To the specious claim that “Nixon was one of the first major candidates to exploit peoples[sic] fear and use it to their political advantage” and “perhaps they have just learned it from the Republicans”, I have a one word answer – Daisy.
If that is Krugman’s central point, then his books are as ill-informed and full of lies as his syndicated columns. That is no mean feat, I assure you.
This is in many ways a continuation of the last thread regarding civil discourse. Public discourse has become absolutely abysmal.
Recently in my local community paper, I was painted in a collective sense as a “ninny, robot and protofascist” by a far left leaning college professor that lives in our community.
For some reason, the left thinks they have permission to say anything in the public arena that they so choose. It is constantly the right that remains civil. Why do you think so much attention was paid to Dick Cheney when he told a member of Congress to f**k off? Because it was so unusual…
I find it tremendously entertaining when the left joins in a war of words against their own.
I think it has come to pass in this country that within the major population centers there exists a decaying view of the right of free speech. Whereas once it meant the freeedom to express a dissenting view without fear of reprisal, it now seems to mean the right to say or print whatever one feels like as long as certain select interests aren’t offended. To me, this is abuse of a right, no less so than failure to properly handle a firearm or failure to vote in an election. It’s a failure to respect the purpose of freedom of speech and that contributes to it’s decay. Nothing in the Constitution or Bill of Rights was ever intended to protect the propagation of hate through public speech, nor the perpetrator from its appropriate consequences.
Daisy worked because movement conservatives could get Goldwater nominated-but could not translate him into something real people could understand.
If you are a card carrying member of CPAC, Krugman’s books have no value-and I do think there are some issues with his latest book-but on the whole I enjoyed it. Mainly because he is right on the mark when talks about the economic disenfranchisement of so many Americans that has occurred during the last 14 years. That I agree with 100%.