<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The return of the Angry White Man</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neptunuslex.com/2008/02/15/the-return-of-the-angry-white-man/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2008/02/15/the-return-of-the-angry-white-man/</link>
	<description>The unbearable lightness of Lex. Enjoy!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:05:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom G.</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2008/02/15/the-return-of-the-angry-white-man/comment-page-1/#comment-423247</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom G.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 01:23:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/2008/02/15/the-return-of-the-angry-white-man/#comment-423247</guid>
		<description>Oh the baggage...can barely walk with all the  baggage...hurts so much...What would Vince Foster do?

But seriously, is it just me or does Obama resemble Alfred E. Neuman?  Not near as funny as Alfred but  they seem to have the same sense of self.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh the baggage&#8230;can barely walk with all the  baggage&#8230;hurts so much&#8230;What would Vince Foster do?</p>
<p>But seriously, is it just me or does Obama resemble Alfred E. Neuman?  Not near as funny as Alfred but  they seem to have the same sense of self.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skippy-san</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2008/02/15/the-return-of-the-angry-white-man/comment-page-1/#comment-423248</link>
		<dc:creator>Skippy-san</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 23:07:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/2008/02/15/the-return-of-the-angry-white-man/#comment-423248</guid>
		<description>Nothing to gag about-the National Journal has summed it up quite well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nothing to gag about-the National Journal has summed it up quite well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Our Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2008/02/15/the-return-of-the-angry-white-man/comment-page-1/#comment-423275</link>
		<dc:creator>Our Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 16:17:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/2008/02/15/the-return-of-the-angry-white-man/#comment-423275</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Lex Alert, Lex Alert:&lt;/strong&gt;

The arguments that I have made in the past, and on this thread:  For McCain to succeed, he has to capture the independent vote, are voiced in a detailed and robust article by &lt;a href=&quot;http://nationaljournal.com/rauch.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Jonathan Rauch&lt;/a&gt; in &lt;i&gt;The National Journal&lt;/i&gt;. Unfortunately, the Journal is by subscription only, so the link is ethereal and has to be captured as a PDF file now...

Some of your readership will activate their gag reflex with paragraphs such as these: &lt;blockquote&gt;But the healthiest news of all is McCain&#039;s emergence as the presumptive Republican nominee. Of all the Republicans in America, McCain is best positioned to undo the errors and correct the excesses of Bush-era Republicanism. If the Bush years were snakebit, think of McCain as an antivenin.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Not all Republicans see it that way, of course. Some would like to see more ruthless partisanship, more fiscal recklessness, more polarization, more presidential monarchism, more erosion of U.S. credibility on human rights, more immigration-bashing. Wiser Republicans, though, know better. They understand that the Big Four of post-Reagan, post-Gingrich Republicanism -- President Bush, Vice President Cheney, former White House strategist Karl Rove, and former House Majority Leader Tom DeLay -- steered the party to a dead end.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Perhaps I can sum up the Grand Old Party&#039;s dilemma:&lt;blockquote&gt; Will there ever in our lifetime be a politician that will run a campaign under the banner of &quot;Compassionate Conservatism&quot;?&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Lex Alert, Lex Alert:</strong></p>
<p>The arguments that I have made in the past, and on this thread:  For McCain to succeed, he has to capture the independent vote, are voiced in a detailed and robust article by <a href="http://nationaljournal.com/rauch.htm" rel="nofollow">Jonathan Rauch</a> in <i>The National Journal</i>. Unfortunately, the Journal is by subscription only, so the link is ethereal and has to be captured as a PDF file now&#8230;</p>
<p>Some of your readership will activate their gag reflex with paragraphs such as these:<br />
<blockquote>But the healthiest news of all is McCain&#8217;s emergence as the presumptive Republican nominee. Of all the Republicans in America, McCain is best positioned to undo the errors and correct the excesses of Bush-era Republicanism. If the Bush years were snakebit, think of McCain as an antivenin.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>Not all Republicans see it that way, of course. Some would like to see more ruthless partisanship, more fiscal recklessness, more polarization, more presidential monarchism, more erosion of U.S. credibility on human rights, more immigration-bashing. Wiser Republicans, though, know better. They understand that the Big Four of post-Reagan, post-Gingrich Republicanism &#8212; President Bush, Vice President Cheney, former White House strategist Karl Rove, and former House Majority Leader Tom DeLay &#8212; steered the party to a dead end.</p></blockquote>
<p>Perhaps I can sum up the Grand Old Party&#8217;s dilemma:<br />
<blockquote> Will there ever in our lifetime be a politician that will run a campaign under the banner of &#8220;Compassionate Conservatism&#8221;?</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: unkawill</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2008/02/15/the-return-of-the-angry-white-man/comment-page-1/#comment-423251</link>
		<dc:creator>unkawill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 07:09:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/2008/02/15/the-return-of-the-angry-white-man/#comment-423251</guid>
		<description>Angry, no. Peeved and put upon, yes.
As I sit in the Dubai airport awaiting my flight back to Baghdag, I am thankful for the upcoming disconnect from the 24 hour news grid. Thompson was my choice, Mc Cain is now. I will leave this mess in all of your very capable hands.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Angry, no. Peeved and put upon, yes.<br />
As I sit in the Dubai airport awaiting my flight back to Baghdag, I am thankful for the upcoming disconnect from the 24 hour news grid. Thompson was my choice, Mc Cain is now. I will leave this mess in all of your very capable hands.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HomefrontSix</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2008/02/15/the-return-of-the-angry-white-man/comment-page-1/#comment-423250</link>
		<dc:creator>HomefrontSix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 06:32:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/2008/02/15/the-return-of-the-angry-white-man/#comment-423250</guid>
		<description>So what happens when a woman falls into the AWM category? Does that make me an AWF? 


I agree with Skippy on this one - I don&#039;t see the race in the bag for either party or candidate. I think that McCain will find support from those who admire his service to country even if they do not agree with his politics but I think a lot of that hinges on who he chooses as his running mate.

I think that many who are currently enamored with Obama who will find that he is &quot; but a walking shadow, a poor player that struts and frets his hour upon the stage and then is heard no more: it is a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.&quot;


So we shall see...we shall see.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what happens when a woman falls into the AWM category? Does that make me an AWF? </p>
<p>I agree with Skippy on this one &#8211; I don&#8217;t see the race in the bag for either party or candidate. I think that McCain will find support from those who admire his service to country even if they do not agree with his politics but I think a lot of that hinges on who he chooses as his running mate.</p>
<p>I think that many who are currently enamored with Obama who will find that he is &#8221; but a walking shadow, a poor player that struts and frets his hour upon the stage and then is heard no more: it is a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.&#8221;</p>
<p>So we shall see&#8230;we shall see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justthisguy</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2008/02/15/the-return-of-the-angry-white-man/comment-page-1/#comment-423249</link>
		<dc:creator>Justthisguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 05:30:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/2008/02/15/the-return-of-the-angry-white-man/#comment-423249</guid>
		<description>EMBRACE THE SUCK!
McCain in 2008!

That&#039;s my bumper sticker, and I&#039;m sorry to say that I mean it, quite seriously.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EMBRACE THE SUCK!<br />
McCain in 2008!</p>
<p>That&#8217;s my bumper sticker, and I&#8217;m sorry to say that I mean it, quite seriously.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

