Neptunus Lex

The unbearable lightness of Lex. Enjoy.

Neptunus Lex header image 2

Ankle biter

March 27th, 2008 · 4 Comments · Uncategorized

A private citizen who jumps into the political scrum can leave a lot of himself out there when he does so. The things we endorse and the things we oppose can be very revealing. Envious lemon-biters with sociology pee-haitch-dees long used to carrying around an aggrieved quiver full of inflamed entitlements while stroking pet disappointments would be well advised to steer clear. People might see.

But you can’t stop them, not all of them. Some of them are compelled to tell you why they will not vote for one or another political candidate. And in doing so, hugely diminish themselves. I give you Doctor Phillip Butler, PhD. Of Sociology.

(Parenthetically, have you ever noticed how people who have advanced degrees in really, really hard subjects - molecular biology or quantum physics, say - invariably introduce themselves outside their professional spheres in self-deprecating terms. “I’m Bob,” one might say. Or, “Pleased to meet you, my name is Laurie.” Never Doctor Bob, or Professor Laurie. Those titles outside the classroom seem reserved for deeply insecure individuals with advanced degrees in sociology, or maybe education. As a knuckle-dragging Luddite I’m out on a limb here and the rule is by no means universal, but it seems to me that there’s an inverse relationship between the difficulty of achieving an advanced degree and the bearer’s insistence on the honorific.)

But I digress.

Doctor Phillip Butler, PhD. (Sociology) feels compelled to tell us why he will not vote for John McCain, and rarely has one man’s descent into impotent envy and wounded self-importance been so bravely diarized. The list of reasons is comprehensive. The Doctor points out that the nearly 72-year old McCain was something of a rascal back in his early 20’s:

John was a wild man. He was funny, with a quick wit and he was intelligent. But he was intent on breaking every USNA regulation in our 4 inch thick USNA Regulations book. And I believe he must have come as close to his goal as any midshipman who ever attended the Academy. John had me “coming around” to his room frequently during my plebe year. And on one occasion he took me with him to escape “over the wall” in the dead of night. He had a taxi cab waiting for us that took us to a bar some 7 miles away. John had a few beers, but forbid me to drink (watching out for me I guess) and made me drink cokes.

He drank beers, true, but those were wild times back in the 60’s. Some folks were burning their bras and draft cards. Some were dodging the draft at elite universities overseas, smoking pot but not inhaling.

Some were grinding it out at the Severn River Trade School while trying to retain a shred of their individuality, with, oh yeah: A war waiting for them after graduation. As a guy with a couple of Black “N’s” of my own and a veteran sea lawyer, I submit that it’s possible that McCain drank beer, but didn’t swallow. You can’t prove he did. And besides, a young man hoping to fly attack jets in combat who doesn’t shake out a couple of reefs while on liberty runs a serious risk of eventually becoming a weenie. With an advanced degree, maybe. The horror.

Sure, John McCain fought in combat, was shot down, wounded and captured. But did you know that Doctor Phillip Butler, PhD (Sociology) was also a Vietnam era POW? It’s true. And he was there first!

People often ask if I was a Prisoner of War with John McCain. My answer is always “No - John McCain was a POW with me.” The reason is I was there for 8 years and John got there 2 ¬? years later, so he was a POW for 5 ¬? years. And we have our own seniority system, based on time as a POW.

But did that POW seniority entitle the doctor to a Senate seat? It did not. Which I think we can all agree was a crime of historic proportions.

The indignities continue. Sure it’s true that McCain was tortured, and that he refused early release, and that he was awarded decorations for his courage and endurance. But lots of people were, according to the doctor. But how many of them are candidates for president?

Just John McCain. And as POWs go, he’s not even senior. The bastard.

And anyway, what’s a harsh test of personal character over many years got to do with being president?

I furthermore believe that having been a POW is no special qualification for being President of the United States. The two jobs are not the same, and POW experience is not, in my opinion, something I would look for in a presidential candidate.

And he’s a sociology PhD. Which I furthermore believe that we should all take into consideration when evaluating his expert political opinion.

Not only is McCain a “hot head” - and lord knows we’ve never had any of those treading the White House boards - he also claims to be a “moderate” Republican. Which the Doctor says he really isn’t. Because of his Bush Clone voting record. That includes opposition to the Bush tax cuts, a bold (if politically unwise) immigration stance, his demonstrated suspicion of big business, his textured view on the need to combat global climate change and his cool relationship with the religious right which leads one to believe that Doctor Phillip Butler, PhD (Sociology) must believe it is essential to be somewhat left of Leon Trotsky in order to be a moderate Republican. Good luck finding someone like that who could get through the primary process.

Taken all together it seems apparent that Senator John McCain will have to do without the vote of Doctor Phillip Butler, PhD (Sociology) and whomever he can influence with this sour piece of wallowing self-pity and navel gazing self-absorption.

Somehow the senator will have to learn to bear it.

Politics ain’t bean bag.

Tags: ···

4 responses so far ↓

  • 1 iceman // Aug 19, 2008 at 2:54 pm

    Butler offered us a compelling discourse as to why McCain shouldn’t be playing the POW card every time something comes up. What do you offer us? An attack of the author? Come up with a sound reason as to why being a POW matters in a Presidential debate. And while you’re at it figure out why a person who claimed to be tortured for 5 years voted to suspend Geneva conventions for military combatants.

  • 2 lex // Aug 19, 2008 at 3:00 pm

    Self parody, brother. The fact that McCain was a shitty plebe 40 years ago is a “compelling discourse”?

    A man who attacks another is himself immune from counter-attack?

    Character doesn’t matter in a president?

    Geneva conventions on the treatment of lawful combatants apply to unlawful combatants?

    Read more.

  • 3 Larry // Aug 19, 2008 at 3:09 pm

    DNO, Lex. That’s what kills me about the whole Guantanamo situation. If any of those screaming about our “illegal detentions” there would actually READ the damn convention, they might figure out that, as you said, the convention deals very specifically with the issue of lawful and unlawful combatants. Lawful combatants (uniformed militaries, recognized militias, partisans wearing identifiable articles) are protected under the Convention. Unlawful combatants are not; in fact, the Convention makes it clear that unlawful combatants (like terrorists who use women and children as shields), once caught, are fully at the mercy of the local commanding officer of the opposing armed forces. That officer has complete latitiude in his treatment of said prisoners, up to and including field courts martial and summary executions. The US has been amazingly restrained in its treatment of terrorists (unlawful combatants). It is becoming apparent that this restraint will not be recognized or rewarded by anyone. I guess those who so vehemently oppose Guantanamo would prefer these unlawful combatants be dealt with as they were in times past.

  • 4 Eagle1 // Aug 19, 2008 at 4:37 pm

    Funny, I wasn’t going to vote for Dr. Butler for president just because he was a POW either. But, if he had willingly gone over the wall with Midshipman McCain, then, by golly, I just might have considered him.

    Too bad for him.

Leave a Comment