<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sticking to what you know</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neptunuslex.com/2008/04/08/sticking-to-what-you-know/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2008/04/08/sticking-to-what-you-know/</link>
	<description>The unbearable lightness of Lex. Enjoy!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 06:48:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: fliterman</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2008/04/08/sticking-to-what-you-know/comment-page-1/#comment-427034</link>
		<dc:creator>fliterman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 15:12:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/?p=3907#comment-427034</guid>
		<description>SnakeEater - Agreed...and fun indeed.  
Also  some especially great stuff  from Jimmy J!    Tnx.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SnakeEater &#8211; Agreed&#8230;and fun indeed.<br />
Also  some especially great stuff  from Jimmy J!    Tnx.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snake Eater</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2008/04/08/sticking-to-what-you-know/comment-page-1/#comment-427033</link>
		<dc:creator>Snake Eater</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 14:14:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/?p=3907#comment-427033</guid>
		<description>filterman, I think/hope that we were  just having a little fun here at the end of the thread.  My only point, hyperbole, sarcasm and wise-assery notwithstanding, was to call you on attempting to hold forth on  a subject that most of these big lugs know intimately from first hand experience   ( see   Jimmy Js comment # 25 above ) ...
Additionally,  I&#039;ve always thought  that unsolicited (especially over the top) advice,  is like an oral contract... not worth the paper its written on...but  then again  to paraphrase old Barry G... neither is  hyperbole, sarcasm or wise-assery, when use in an attempt to  prevoke a comment ( see B2s shameless groveling # 22 above) or make a point,  a vice.     Best</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>filterman, I think/hope that we were  just having a little fun here at the end of the thread.  My only point, hyperbole, sarcasm and wise-assery notwithstanding, was to call you on attempting to hold forth on  a subject that most of these big lugs know intimately from first hand experience   ( see   Jimmy Js comment # 25 above ) &#8230;<br />
Additionally,  I&#8217;ve always thought  that unsolicited (especially over the top) advice,  is like an oral contract&#8230; not worth the paper its written on&#8230;but  then again  to paraphrase old Barry G&#8230; neither is  hyperbole, sarcasm or wise-assery, when use in an attempt to  prevoke a comment ( see B2s shameless groveling # 22 above) or make a point,  a vice.     Best</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy J.</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2008/04/08/sticking-to-what-you-know/comment-page-1/#comment-427032</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy J.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 04:27:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/?p=3907#comment-427032</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a bit late to the party here. 

In the Air Wing on Midway the F-4s were used as flak suppressors a couple of times. Then one came back with a big hole in it and CAG said, &quot;No more. Too expensive to do that crap.&quot; (They were a really expensive airplane for the times.) So they were always CAP after that. The F-8s were used for flak suppression and the Photo Det flew F-8s as well.


The A-4s and A-1s did all the dive bombing. They  did have Bull Pups, a wire line guided bomb, which the A-4s tried to drop on a few occasions. They always went ballistic, so they kind of gave up on them.

The A-1s were also used for RESCAP and that is how one of the MIG kills came about.  It was fortunate that VA-25&#039;s XO, later CO, Harry Entslinger, was a Korean vet.  On the first RESCAP mission a division was sent up to loiter on station near the picket destroyer.  They were flying a loose division formation as they orbited in their assigned  area. Harry found out about it and he called an all pilots meeting, post haste. He explained to everybody that when loitering on station like that you needed to fly sections on each side of the loiter circle. The reason was each section was then in position to turn into any attacker. It&#039;s an old tactic from WWII called the Thach Weave. Fighter jocks knew this stuff, but SPAD drivers seldom thought about, &quot;What if a MIG attacks me?&quot; That APM paid off.

Anyhoo, a coupla days later the two VA-25 sections are using the tactic, when, the DD calls &#039;em up and says, &quot;We got bogies closing on your position!&quot;  The A-1 drivers armed their 20MMs and put their heads on swivels.

Sure enough two MIGs were making a beeline for those tempting looking 150 knot targets. The MIGs picked one section and went for them. The other section turned across the orbit and had a perfect deflection shot at the attacking MIGs. The A-1  section leader was Clint Johnson. He said all he saw was a MIG filling his wind screen as he blasted away. Then he saw MIG pieces flying around. (4 20 MMs can be pretty devastatingwhen on target.) The other MIG didn&#039;t like what he saw and  took off.  Score one MIG for the SPADs with an assist from the Thach Weave. 

Hope that helps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a bit late to the party here. </p>
<p>In the Air Wing on Midway the F-4s were used as flak suppressors a couple of times. Then one came back with a big hole in it and CAG said, &#8220;No more. Too expensive to do that crap.&#8221; (They were a really expensive airplane for the times.) So they were always CAP after that. The F-8s were used for flak suppression and the Photo Det flew F-8s as well.</p>
<p>The A-4s and A-1s did all the dive bombing. They  did have Bull Pups, a wire line guided bomb, which the A-4s tried to drop on a few occasions. They always went ballistic, so they kind of gave up on them.</p>
<p>The A-1s were also used for RESCAP and that is how one of the MIG kills came about.  It was fortunate that VA-25&#8242;s XO, later CO, Harry Entslinger, was a Korean vet.  On the first RESCAP mission a division was sent up to loiter on station near the picket destroyer.  They were flying a loose division formation as they orbited in their assigned  area. Harry found out about it and he called an all pilots meeting, post haste. He explained to everybody that when loitering on station like that you needed to fly sections on each side of the loiter circle. The reason was each section was then in position to turn into any attacker. It&#8217;s an old tactic from WWII called the Thach Weave. Fighter jocks knew this stuff, but SPAD drivers seldom thought about, &#8220;What if a MIG attacks me?&#8221; That APM paid off.</p>
<p>Anyhoo, a coupla days later the two VA-25 sections are using the tactic, when, the DD calls &#8216;em up and says, &#8220;We got bogies closing on your position!&#8221;  The A-1 drivers armed their 20MMs and put their heads on swivels.</p>
<p>Sure enough two MIGs were making a beeline for those tempting looking 150 knot targets. The MIGs picked one section and went for them. The other section turned across the orbit and had a perfect deflection shot at the attacking MIGs. The A-1  section leader was Clint Johnson. He said all he saw was a MIG filling his wind screen as he blasted away. Then he saw MIG pieces flying around. (4 20 MMs can be pretty devastatingwhen on target.) The other MIG didn&#8217;t like what he saw and  took off.  Score one MIG for the SPADs with an assist from the Thach Weave. </p>
<p>Hope that helps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flatlander</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2008/04/08/sticking-to-what-you-know/comment-page-1/#comment-427031</link>
		<dc:creator>Flatlander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 04:05:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/?p=3907#comment-427031</guid>
		<description>The senator insults McCain and all military aviators with his implication.  Incredible that we continue to elect such men to high office.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The senator insults McCain and all military aviators with his implication.  Incredible that we continue to elect such men to high office.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fliterman</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2008/04/08/sticking-to-what-you-know/comment-page-1/#comment-427030</link>
		<dc:creator>fliterman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 21:53:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/?p=3907#comment-427030</guid>
		<description>Appreciate the thought, SnakeE.  

Although a few of my details may have been slightly suspect, my  (sidetracking)  message was mostly legit, no?

  And thanks for the unsolicited advice, but I believe I can hold my own with this sometimes august, and sometimes not, motley and urbane crowd.... Even if I&#039;m the odd-man-out,  &#039;lefty&#039;.  Also  I suppose if everyone here stuck solely to what they truly and thoroughly know, rather than merely what they think they know, there might be at least 50% less comments . . .  you think?

[PS. I&#039;m still working on throttling back any excessive, &#039;gas-bagocity&#039;, just for you, SnakeE.]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Appreciate the thought, SnakeE.  </p>
<p>Although a few of my details may have been slightly suspect, my  (sidetracking)  message was mostly legit, no?</p>
<p>  And thanks for the unsolicited advice, but I believe I can hold my own with this sometimes august, and sometimes not, motley and urbane crowd&#8230;. Even if I&#8217;m the odd-man-out,  &#8216;lefty&#8217;.  Also  I suppose if everyone here stuck solely to what they truly and thoroughly know, rather than merely what they think they know, there might be at least 50% less comments . . .  you think?</p>
<p>[PS. I'm still working on throttling back any excessive, 'gas-bagocity', just for you, SnakeE.]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: b2</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2008/04/08/sticking-to-what-you-know/comment-page-1/#comment-427029</link>
		<dc:creator>b2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 21:04:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/?p=3907#comment-427029</guid>
		<description>Flit,

Snake has shamed me by calling me a &quot;goober&quot;, plus I&#039;m scared he&#039;ll send me one of dem supeenies on your behalf, the old ambulance chaser.  

I was uneccesarily  hard on ya by lumping ya in with Jay&#039;s defenders. I apologize. You did say Jay&#039;s remarks were &quot;reprehensible&quot;.  I simply saw red and fired at the messenger when you went further  to mitigate and well..you hopefully  know.

Now I gotta figure out what besotted means..it don&#039;t sound good.

b2</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Flit,</p>
<p>Snake has shamed me by calling me a &#8220;goober&#8221;, plus I&#8217;m scared he&#8217;ll send me one of dem supeenies on your behalf, the old ambulance chaser.  </p>
<p>I was uneccesarily  hard on ya by lumping ya in with Jay&#8217;s defenders. I apologize. You did say Jay&#8217;s remarks were &#8220;reprehensible&#8221;.  I simply saw red and fired at the messenger when you went further  to mitigate and well..you hopefully  know.</p>
<p>Now I gotta figure out what besotted means..it don&#8217;t sound good.</p>
<p>b2</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

