Hot Mic

Omakase

Amazon Search

Jeff G. sighting

Hizzoner’s signal emerges from the noise band to ponder the consequences of Hope! For Change! as applied to judicial nominees and constitutional philosophy. You may or may not be surprised to learn that intentionalism is touched upon.

When you have successfully turned all meaning into something that in in the abstract

Share

1 comment to Jeff G. sighting

  • RonF

    From Wikipedia, the following are the two oaths that a Supreme Court justice must take:

    I, XXX XXX, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me as XXX under the Constitution and laws of the United States. So help me God.

    and

    I, AB, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.

    It seems to me that what Senator Obama proposes is that he’ll appoint justices who are guaranteed to intend to break the first oath from the moment they hear their first case.

eXTReMe Tracker

View My Stats