<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Straight talk from the chairman</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neptunuslex.com/2008/05/25/straight-talk-from-the-chairman/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2008/05/25/straight-talk-from-the-chairman/</link>
	<description>The unbearable lightness of Lex. Enjoy!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:19:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skippy-san</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2008/05/25/straight-talk-from-the-chairman/comment-page-1/#comment-429864</link>
		<dc:creator>Skippy-san</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 13:31:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/?p=4187#comment-429864</guid>
		<description>Nose, you pointed out that Mullen stayed around because he knew how to fix it. Thus he was not guilty of not sticking up for principle-even though by the time he got into a position to fix it the damage had been made a hell of lot worse.

I still think the situation in 2004 and 2005 was a lot more complicated than anyone here lets on and without considering the role that people like Bremer, Wolfwitz and others played the story is incomplete.

Sanchez and the others have not really spoken in months, so why raise this point now?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nose, you pointed out that Mullen stayed around because he knew how to fix it. Thus he was not guilty of not sticking up for principle-even though by the time he got into a position to fix it the damage had been made a hell of lot worse.</p>
<p>I still think the situation in 2004 and 2005 was a lot more complicated than anyone here lets on and without considering the role that people like Bremer, Wolfwitz and others played the story is incomplete.</p>
<p>Sanchez and the others have not really spoken in months, so why raise this point now?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nose</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2008/05/25/straight-talk-from-the-chairman/comment-page-1/#comment-429869</link>
		<dc:creator>Nose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 15:57:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/?p=4187#comment-429869</guid>
		<description>Thanks Lex,

I just got through saying the same thing at Skippy&#039;s house.

Just, you know, a whole lot stupider.

Nose</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Lex,</p>
<p>I just got through saying the same thing at Skippy&#8217;s house.</p>
<p>Just, you know, a whole lot stupider.</p>
<p>Nose</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lex</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2008/05/25/straight-talk-from-the-chairman/comment-page-1/#comment-429876</link>
		<dc:creator>lex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 14:47:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/?p=4187#comment-429876</guid>
		<description>This is really rather straightforward Skip. If &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/Wiser-Battle-Soldiers-Ricardo-Sanchez/dp/0061562424&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;you&#039;re in command&lt;/a&gt; while things are going from bad to worse and you soldiers are getting killed in ever larger numbers and you don&#039;t believe that you&#039;re getting the support you need from either the joint chiefs or the politicians, it doesn&#039;t matter what was or wasn&#039;t said behind closed doors - your people are dying and at some point you&#039;ve got to stand for something besides muddling through for that fourth star. A commander is responsible for executing policy - any commander who doesn&#039;t believe the policy is either correct or executable under his current constraints would be better off getting out of the way in favor of one who can commit to it.

So: You take a stand, throw your stars on the table and issue an &quot;or else&quot; ultimatum, and if they call you, you quit. And then hit the talk show circuit. And change the debate.

The Chairman is clearly not afraid of debate, and this is not even about the Iraq war, except tangentially - it&#039;s about leadership, and doing the right thing. He&#039;s right to point to those who had the power to change things - either in uniform or by resigning - and who failed to do so as moral cowards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is really rather straightforward Skip. If <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Wiser-Battle-Soldiers-Ricardo-Sanchez/dp/0061562424" rel="nofollow">you&#8217;re in command</a> while things are going from bad to worse and you soldiers are getting killed in ever larger numbers and you don&#8217;t believe that you&#8217;re getting the support you need from either the joint chiefs or the politicians, it doesn&#8217;t matter what was or wasn&#8217;t said behind closed doors &#8211; your people are dying and at some point you&#8217;ve got to stand for something besides muddling through for that fourth star. A commander is responsible for executing policy &#8211; any commander who doesn&#8217;t believe the policy is either correct or executable under his current constraints would be better off getting out of the way in favor of one who can commit to it.</p>
<p>So: You take a stand, throw your stars on the table and issue an &#8220;or else&#8221; ultimatum, and if they call you, you quit. And then hit the talk show circuit. And change the debate.</p>
<p>The Chairman is clearly not afraid of debate, and this is not even about the Iraq war, except tangentially &#8211; it&#8217;s about leadership, and doing the right thing. He&#8217;s right to point to those who had the power to change things &#8211; either in uniform or by resigning &#8211; and who failed to do so as moral cowards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zane</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2008/05/25/straight-talk-from-the-chairman/comment-page-1/#comment-429874</link>
		<dc:creator>Zane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 13:17:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/?p=4187#comment-429874</guid>
		<description>Liz, I always have at least five cups of espresso before posting.  Don&#039;t worry about being ornery, what with Skippy and Snakey and Nose around, we&#039;re all thick-skinned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Liz, I always have at least five cups of espresso before posting.  Don&#8217;t worry about being ornery, what with Skippy and Snakey and Nose around, we&#8217;re all thick-skinned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liz</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2008/05/25/straight-talk-from-the-chairman/comment-page-1/#comment-429875</link>
		<dc:creator>Liz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 13:11:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/?p=4187#comment-429875</guid>
		<description>Just reading through my messages above and I came across a lot more ornery than I intended. 

Damn, sorry. I should have my morning coffee before posting....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just reading through my messages above and I came across a lot more ornery than I intended. </p>
<p>Damn, sorry. I should have my morning coffee before posting&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skippy-san</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2008/05/25/straight-talk-from-the-chairman/comment-page-1/#comment-429873</link>
		<dc:creator>Skippy-san</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 12:52:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/?p=4187#comment-429873</guid>
		<description>Shinseki left on time-Summer 2003.

Rumsfeld had emasculated him though by announcing his successor 15 months ahead of time. Shinseki had been Chief of Staff since 1999 so he appears to have served a full 4 year term.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shinseki left on time-Summer 2003.</p>
<p>Rumsfeld had emasculated him though by announcing his successor 15 months ahead of time. Shinseki had been Chief of Staff since 1999 so he appears to have served a full 4 year term.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

