<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Profiling Petraeus</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neptunuslex.com/2008/06/29/profiling-petraeus/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2008/06/29/profiling-petraeus/</link>
	<description>The unbearable lightness of Lex. Enjoy!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 04:54:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom G.</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2008/06/29/profiling-petraeus/comment-page-1/#comment-431827</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom G.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 22:39:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/?p=4335#comment-431827</guid>
		<description>&quot;Your point of view on that question will much depend, I suppose, on what it is you hope for.&quot;

Also depends on the length of one&#039;s view, but one thing is axiomatic: The most vocal pros/cons are the ones most incapable &amp; most unwilling to enter the arena.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Your point of view on that question will much depend, I suppose, on what it is you hope for.&#8221;</p>
<p>Also depends on the length of one&#8217;s view, but one thing is axiomatic: The most vocal pros/cons are the ones most incapable &amp; most unwilling to enter the arena.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flatlander</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2008/06/29/profiling-petraeus/comment-page-1/#comment-431829</link>
		<dc:creator>Flatlander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 17:08:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/?p=4335#comment-431829</guid>
		<description>The situation recalls, sadly, that of Abrams in the final years of Viet Nam.   The General finally got the strategy right, but the country was not willing to gut it out.  

The last hope is that McCain can prevail at home, and give Petraeus the time  he needs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The situation recalls, sadly, that of Abrams in the final years of Viet Nam.   The General finally got the strategy right, but the country was not willing to gut it out.  </p>
<p>The last hope is that McCain can prevail at home, and give Petraeus the time  he needs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: XBradTC</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2008/06/29/profiling-petraeus/comment-page-1/#comment-431828</link>
		<dc:creator>XBradTC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 06:48:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/?p=4335#comment-431828</guid>
		<description>What always frustrated me about the counterinsurgency effort was the emphasis on reconstruction and building the Iraqi army. 
That&#039;s an ultimate goal. 
First, control the battlespace. Ensure security. Once you do that, it gets easier to do so many other things. It&#039;s a heck of a lot easier to convince someone to trust you if they aren&#039;t getting blown up for it. 

Skippy is against the whole venture, and even veers into the occasional BDS, but I seem to recall that he bemoaned the lack of troops there, once we recognized the insurgency. I can agree with that. I think part of why we didn&#039;t do that was economy of force. We knew we would be there for a while and tried to balance having a large presence v. sustaining the force over a long period of time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What always frustrated me about the counterinsurgency effort was the emphasis on reconstruction and building the Iraqi army.<br />
That&#8217;s an ultimate goal.<br />
First, control the battlespace. Ensure security. Once you do that, it gets easier to do so many other things. It&#8217;s a heck of a lot easier to convince someone to trust you if they aren&#8217;t getting blown up for it. </p>
<p>Skippy is against the whole venture, and even veers into the occasional BDS, but I seem to recall that he bemoaned the lack of troops there, once we recognized the insurgency. I can agree with that. I think part of why we didn&#8217;t do that was economy of force. We knew we would be there for a while and tried to balance having a large presence v. sustaining the force over a long period of time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

