<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Commwealth flying</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neptunuslex.com/2008/07/26/commwealth-flying/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2008/07/26/commwealth-flying/</link>
	<description>The unbearable lightness of Lex. Enjoy!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 06:20:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mrdeux</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2008/07/26/commwealth-flying/comment-page-1/#comment-245836</link>
		<dc:creator>mrdeux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 13:31:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/?p=4555#comment-245836</guid>
		<description>If anyone is still interested in this event, a subsequent ATSB release gives some more data, as well as a link to a 40 page pdf of data.

http://www.atsb.gov.au/newsroom/2008/release/2008_33.aspx

Seems I was wrong about the flight controls....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If anyone is still interested in this event, a subsequent ATSB release gives some more data, as well as a link to a 40 page pdf of data.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.atsb.gov.au/newsroom/2008/release/2008_33.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.atsb.gov.au/newsroom/2008/release/2008_33.aspx</a></p>
<p>Seems I was wrong about the flight controls&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ikztorks</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2008/07/26/commwealth-flying/comment-page-1/#comment-231012</link>
		<dc:creator>ikztorks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 16:39:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/?p=4555#comment-231012</guid>
		<description>O2 Bottles:  
In small aircraft (a/c), the O2 bottle is often refilled when empty, so the Bottle stays with the a/c.   In large airliners, may we assume that the bottle is changed, rather than refilled in situ?
If so, the bottle in question is not &quot;part&quot; of the original airliner, but a replaceable item. 
In my [limited] experience, the O2 bottles have a finite life (20 yrs), and are to be tested periodically.  
I think it is imperative to know if  the bottle in question 1) had been replaced or refilled,2) had been tested, and 3) was within it&#039;s life limit.....
We need more information before we draw conculsions!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>O2 Bottles:<br />
In small aircraft (a/c), the O2 bottle is often refilled when empty, so the Bottle stays with the a/c.   In large airliners, may we assume that the bottle is changed, rather than refilled in situ?<br />
If so, the bottle in question is not &#8220;part&#8221; of the original airliner, but a replaceable item.<br />
In my [limited] experience, the O2 bottles have a finite life (20 yrs), and are to be tested periodically.<br />
I think it is imperative to know if  the bottle in question 1) had been replaced or refilled,2) had been tested, and 3) was within it&#8217;s life limit&#8230;..<br />
We need more information before we draw conculsions!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NSEU</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2008/07/26/commwealth-flying/comment-page-1/#comment-230846</link>
		<dc:creator>NSEU</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 05:43:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/?p=4555#comment-230846</guid>
		<description>&quot;Supposedly independent landing systems&quot;?

They _are_ totally independent when the aircraft is landing...  Not at 30,000&#039;. 
&quot;Landing system&quot;? I suppose the average punter is now thinking that the aircraft can&#039;t land without these.

Emergency door? Sure.. a door to be used in an emergency, but used every day when there isn&#039;t an emergency.

&quot;The aircraft’s controls were not affected but &quot;

Well, at least the normal controls weren&#039;t affected... Can they confirm that the backup ones weren&#039;t?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Supposedly independent landing systems&#8221;?</p>
<p>They _are_ totally independent when the aircraft is landing&#8230;  Not at 30,000&#8242;.<br />
&#8220;Landing system&#8221;? I suppose the average punter is now thinking that the aircraft can&#8217;t land without these.</p>
<p>Emergency door? Sure.. a door to be used in an emergency, but used every day when there isn&#8217;t an emergency.</p>
<p>&#8220;The aircraft’s controls were not affected but &#8221;</p>
<p>Well, at least the normal controls weren&#8217;t affected&#8230; Can they confirm that the backup ones weren&#8217;t?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: QF30 Emergency Landing in MNL after door &#34;Popped&#34; - Page 13 - The Australian Frequent Flyer Online Community</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2008/07/26/commwealth-flying/comment-page-1/#comment-230740</link>
		<dc:creator>QF30 Emergency Landing in MNL after door &#34;Popped&#34; - Page 13 - The Australian Frequent Flyer Online Community</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 00:44:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/?p=4555#comment-230740</guid>
		<description>[...] A piece of an exploding oxygen tank is believed to have pushed the handle of an emergency door into the opening position, after smashing through the floor on a Qantas flight from Hong Kong. Last Friday a Qantas international jet was forced to make an emergency landing at Manila after a mid-air explosion tore a hole in the plane&#039;s fuselage. Passengers were not in danger of the doors opening because they are designed so they cannot be opened mid-flight, The Australian reports today. But after examining photographs, industry observers were surprised the door was pushed into the opening position. &quot;It&#039;s an incredibly rare event for the oxygen tank to explode and for it to hit the door handle and rotate it open is just eye-watering,&quot; a source told The Australian. The aircraft&#039;s controls were not affected but some computer functions and electrics were disrupted, including three of the plane&#039;s supposedly independent landing systems. Sources said the emergency descent from 29,000 feet to 10,000 feet took about four minutes. AAP     Exploding oxygen tank &#039;opened emergency door&#039; - National - BrisbaneTimes   Wonder whether this is the source mentioned (from pprune) for some of the material in their article... and how reliable and verifiable it is by News Ltd...  Commwealth flying &#124; Neptunus Lex [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A piece of an exploding oxygen tank is believed to have pushed the handle of an emergency door into the opening position, after smashing through the floor on a Qantas flight from Hong Kong. Last Friday a Qantas international jet was forced to make an emergency landing at Manila after a mid-air explosion tore a hole in the plane&#8217;s fuselage. Passengers were not in danger of the doors opening because they are designed so they cannot be opened mid-flight, The Australian reports today. But after examining photographs, industry observers were surprised the door was pushed into the opening position. &quot;It&#8217;s an incredibly rare event for the oxygen tank to explode and for it to hit the door handle and rotate it open is just eye-watering,&quot; a source told The Australian. The aircraft&#8217;s controls were not affected but some computer functions and electrics were disrupted, including three of the plane&#8217;s supposedly independent landing systems. Sources said the emergency descent from 29,000 feet to 10,000 feet took about four minutes. AAP     Exploding oxygen tank &#8216;opened emergency door&#8217; &#8211; National &#8211; BrisbaneTimes   Wonder whether this is the source mentioned (from pprune) for some of the material in their article&#8230; and how reliable and verifiable it is by News Ltd&#8230;  Commwealth flying | Neptunus Lex [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Parkes</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2008/07/26/commwealth-flying/comment-page-1/#comment-230205</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Parkes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 01:40:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/?p=4555#comment-230205</guid>
		<description>What exactly is a &quot;routine air turn back?&quot;

Badbob?  No U in QANTAS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What exactly is a &#8220;routine air turn back?&#8221;</p>
<p>Badbob?  No U in QANTAS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: badbob</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2008/07/26/commwealth-flying/comment-page-1/#comment-230005</link>
		<dc:creator>badbob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 17:40:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/?p=4555#comment-230005</guid>
		<description>Quantas incident #2- Unrelated it appears:

http://www.news.com.au/dailytelegraph/story/0,22049,24092835-5001021,00.html

b2</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quantas incident #2- Unrelated it appears:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.news.com.au/dailytelegraph/story/0,22049,24092835-5001021,00.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.news.com.au/dailytelegraph/story/0,22049,24092835-5001021,00.html</a></p>
<p>b2</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

