I don’t like the things you say, and I’m unable to rebut you in fact. So I’m going to do the best I can to shut you the hell up.
The problem Muslims have with (Coptic priest Zakaria) Botros is that they simply cannot refute his “rants” and “hate speech,” for the simple reason that everything he says — no matter how scandalizing for Islam — is always based on Islamic sources.
Thus, interfaith “dialogue.”
Every ideology has that problem, and most of us are not bright enough to exploit it.
People keep inventing things to try and take down their perceived political opponent. Why?
Just use what he says. Nothing else needed.
It wasn’t till 2/3rds down the article that it was revealed that this is happening in Michigan!
Michigan? I said out loud… I thought this report was from Egypt.
Hehe…damn Copts…what can ya do withem? Hillaire Belloc wrote extensively on “The Great and Enduring Heresy of Mohammed” and concluded the prophet was mad. I’ve yet to read a better argument.
There is a saying that it is better to be thought an idiot than to open one’s mouth and remove all doubt.
There is also a corollary, if you’ve no ammunition against the idiot it is entirely probable that he’s not the one who is wrong.
Thus defamation of character rather than refutation of message. I find this telling.
– Max
Hey Lex, the ldftards are going to blow a gasket with the referral to Voltaire.