Hot Mic

Omakase

Amazon Search

Community Organizing

Your correspondent emerges from the funk of post-golf naptitude and beer-swilling cameraderie to point out that community organizing is so something to be proud of.

So there.

Also, I saw the little pig-tailed Hummer chick. Which doesn’t at all sound the way I meant it to sound.

Even if you don’t want to know what that one guy is blowing on in the last frame. ‘Cos trust me, you don’t.

Share

54 comments to Community Organizing

  • Curtis

    km,

    I met my brother-in-law back when he was an Assistant Professor at University of Chicago on the tenure track. He already had dozens of peer reviewed books and articles published. However, that particular grove of academe happens to be in Hyde Park, so he negotiated a full professorship at UMD and then departed on a Guggenheim grant for a year out here on the west coast. He spent that year mentoring his grad students at both UC and UMD (via email) and co-wrote two more books. He impressed upon me the absolute imperative of academics (real academics, not womyn’s studies); publish or perish.

    It’s been 25 years since we met and he’s now an Institute Professor with scores of fellowships, books and articles to his name. I twit him from time to time that Cleveland is hardly better than Hyde Park. :)

    How can there not be a single journal article with Obama’s name on it? Is there a single grant application that he authored or any sign that he wrote a single legal brief?

    Empty suit and when he’s not using a teleprompter he’s not quite as articulate as Bush.

  • KM

    So Curtis…I think we’re in agreement?

    It’s very unlikely that Chicago would have offered Obama a tenured position…best he could have been offered was a tenure track–and as you noted–to succeed in that, one had better hit the ground running–he certainly doesn’t show up as published on J-stor, but not sure if there is a more appropriate electronic database for law publications–not my thing…and have never been sure what the professional schools seem to think counts as appropriate academic preformance…so I don’t know what the publication expectations at time of hire are in those schools. Certainly in top tier schools, even for entry level positions one should have multiple refereed journal articles and the dissertation well on the way to being a book manuscript…at least in the humanities and social sciences.

    As for Women and Gender’s studies–they have to publish as much as any other social science–they just have to do it backwards and in high heels. :)

  • Curtis

    KM,

    Absolutely.

    You might find it interesting to read K.C. Johnson’s Durham in Wonderland blog. It became pretty clear to me that there are hundreds of faculty members at Duke with the flimsiest academic achievement. It looks like most of the flimsiest profs have just one article or book to their name even after years in the “grove”.

    I hasten to confess that I have no such articles to my name since I’ve wasted my time writing CONOPS, UNS, ICDs, ORDs, MNSs, CCDs, OPLANS and OPORDS.

    My one submission to USNI was bought, never published and returned 8 years later. Who cares that my diatribe on the idiocy of mine warfare shifting everything to Texas was never read by the Illuminati? It gave me 8 years of free membership at USNI while they slowly decided that only a jackass would decry the Navy’s decision to concentrate 100% of our MCM assets in Texas and never mind the strategic implications of that lame brained decision. Damn! I failed peer review!

    These days, I’m an adjunct professor for reality.

  • Our Paul

    I just simply love this kind of stuff. And thus, to Flatlander, KM, Curtis, and David Culp, I quite agree with all your arguments. To offer tenure to teacher who has no legal publications and whose scholarship is limited to editing the Harvard Law Review is unbelievable. Jim Lindgreen, professor at Northwestern University Law School, writing in Volokh Conspiracy, a Center Right legal blog that Lex has on occasion quoted, had this to say:

    Many non-academic readers of this blog may not have understood why this was such an implausible story in the first place. In any event, now I’ve talked to enough Chicago faculty that this story can be safely put to bed.

    The good professor is my kind of guy, a bulldog without lipstick. He bases his conclusions on off the record interviews of selected members of the University of Chicago Law School (by all accounts, Center Right/Libertarian in its political philosophy). Well worth a read, for it will fortify your doubting hearts.

    Meanwhile, over at the University of Chicago’s News Office has this to say:

    Like Obama, each of the Law School’s Senior Lecturers has high-demand careers in politics or public service, which prevent full-time teaching. Several times during his 12 years as a professor in the Law School, Obama was invited to join the faculty in a full-time tenure-track position, but he declined.

    There is no date on this news release, but to the best of my knowledge it has not been retracted.

    Perhaps some insight can be gained in an article in this past Sunday New York Time Magazine (gasp, that dreadful rag again). The article focuses on the how and what Obama taught, as viewed through his students eyes, and whether this provided insight into his decision making process as a President. In it, this whole issue of tenured tract offers is mentioned, and discussed by the Dean of the Law School.

    These points are presented for your consideration to emphasize that this whole business, as voiced in my post that examined Obama’s time line, is a pseudo-controversy. It distracts from the central issue, the problems our country faces today.

eXTReMe Tracker

View My Stats