<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Filling the Niche</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neptunuslex.com/2008/10/23/filling-the-niche/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2008/10/23/filling-the-niche/</link>
	<description>The unbearable lightness of Lex. Enjoy!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 18:16:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris Parkes</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2008/10/23/filling-the-niche/comment-page-1/#comment-270244</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Parkes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 03:58:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/?p=5802#comment-270244</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re right about faces and names changing, but little else.  The Romans spent years (and piles of gold) subduing Cilician pirates, who even captured Julius Caesar, IIRC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right about faces and names changing, but little else.  The Romans spent years (and piles of gold) subduing Cilician pirates, who even captured Julius Caesar, IIRC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rivetjoint</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2008/10/23/filling-the-niche/comment-page-1/#comment-269792</link>
		<dc:creator>Rivetjoint</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 00:16:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/?p=5802#comment-269792</guid>
		<description>&quot;And when it’s crunch time at work, well, most of the crunch is outbound.&quot;

Max, thanks!  That comment and imagery made my day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;And when it’s crunch time at work, well, most of the crunch is outbound.&#8221;</p>
<p>Max, thanks!  That comment and imagery made my day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BeachBum</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2008/10/23/filling-the-niche/comment-page-1/#comment-269726</link>
		<dc:creator>BeachBum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 20:17:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/?p=5802#comment-269726</guid>
		<description>Virgil,

WWII Mk12 guns were 5&quot; 38s, as you say.  The &#039;38&#039; refers to the length of the gun barrel, 38 x the 5&quot; caliber.

The modern 5&quot; mount, the Mk45, is a 5&quot; 54 (also written as 5&quot; L54 or 5/54).  Longer barrel than the WWII mounts, but exact same caliber.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Virgil,</p>
<p>WWII Mk12 guns were 5&#8243; 38s, as you say.  The &#8216;38&#8242; refers to the length of the gun barrel, 38 x the 5&#8243; caliber.</p>
<p>The modern 5&#8243; mount, the Mk45, is a 5&#8243; 54 (also written as 5&#8243; L54 or 5/54).  Longer barrel than the WWII mounts, but exact same caliber.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: virgil xenophon</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2008/10/23/filling-the-niche/comment-page-1/#comment-269225</link>
		<dc:creator>virgil xenophon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 20:59:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/?p=5802#comment-269225</guid>
		<description>BTW, FWIW, the old WWII guns were called 5&quot; 38s. Are the current ones a slightly smaller caliber or is it just a nomenclature change? Enlighten a zoomie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW, FWIW, the old WWII guns were called 5&#8243; 38s. Are the current ones a slightly smaller caliber or is it just a nomenclature change? Enlighten a zoomie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Idaho Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2008/10/23/filling-the-niche/comment-page-1/#comment-269180</link>
		<dc:creator>Idaho Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 19:51:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/?p=5802#comment-269180</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt; 5″ deck guns and 50 cal. guns at least. That should be enough for lightly armored pirate vessels.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

They forgot to mention the gun ship that will be sitting on the helicopter pad on 5 minute alert.  And if it doesn&#039;t involve Keira Knightley it should.  Just because.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p> 5″ deck guns and 50 cal. guns at least. That should be enough for lightly armored pirate vessels.</p></blockquote>
<p>They forgot to mention the gun ship that will be sitting on the helicopter pad on 5 minute alert.  And if it doesn&#8217;t involve Keira Knightley it should.  Just because.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ASM826</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2008/10/23/filling-the-niche/comment-page-1/#comment-269176</link>
		<dc:creator>ASM826</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 19:46:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/?p=5802#comment-269176</guid>
		<description>The ship won&#039;t be armed? What the ...

5&quot; deck guns and 50 cal. guns at least. That should be enough for lightly armored pirate vessels.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ship won&#8217;t be armed? What the &#8230;</p>
<p>5&#8243; deck guns and 50 cal. guns at least. That should be enough for lightly armored pirate vessels.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
