<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Scent of a Woman</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neptunuslex.com/2009/01/08/the-scent-of-a-woman/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2009/01/08/the-scent-of-a-woman/</link>
	<description>The unbearable lightness of Lex. Enjoy!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 08:11:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: MaxDamage</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2009/01/08/the-scent-of-a-woman/comment-page-1/#comment-311089</link>
		<dc:creator>MaxDamage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 06:25:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/?p=7053#comment-311089</guid>
		<description>Virgil, thank you for the kind words.  I&#039;ve often thought that Washington, DC should be abandoned and the houses of Congress moved to Rapid City.

First, it&#039;s a much more central location and thus more convenient.

Second, think of the money we&#039;d save on air conditioning!

Finally, once you gaze upon those busts carved out of a mountain, one might obtain a bit of perspective and realize the pomp, circumstance, and grandeur of a Washington monument or the reflecting pool in the mall is dwarfed utterly by the grandeur that is the vastness of this nation.

Ain&#039;t gonna happen, I know, but I can dream.

  - Max</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Virgil, thank you for the kind words.  I&#8217;ve often thought that Washington, DC should be abandoned and the houses of Congress moved to Rapid City.</p>
<p>First, it&#8217;s a much more central location and thus more convenient.</p>
<p>Second, think of the money we&#8217;d save on air conditioning!</p>
<p>Finally, once you gaze upon those busts carved out of a mountain, one might obtain a bit of perspective and realize the pomp, circumstance, and grandeur of a Washington monument or the reflecting pool in the mall is dwarfed utterly by the grandeur that is the vastness of this nation.</p>
<p>Ain&#8217;t gonna happen, I know, but I can dream.</p>
<p>  &#8211; Max</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SCOTTtheBADGER</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2009/01/08/the-scent-of-a-woman/comment-page-1/#comment-310709</link>
		<dc:creator>SCOTTtheBADGER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 08:20:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/?p=7053#comment-310709</guid>
		<description>Surely Mr. Obama will transfer to the CV by going down the boarding ladder of the Presidential Yacht MAYFLOWER, and walking over to the boat platform of the CV.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surely Mr. Obama will transfer to the CV by going down the boarding ladder of the Presidential Yacht MAYFLOWER, and walking over to the boat platform of the CV.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: virgil xenophon</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2009/01/08/the-scent-of-a-woman/comment-page-1/#comment-310694</link>
		<dc:creator>virgil xenophon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 07:42:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/?p=7053#comment-310694</guid>
		<description>MAX/

I used to spend a bit of time in the &quot;banana belt&quot; at Rapid City--did quite a bit of business with Prairie States Life
which is headquartered there. Mt. Rushmore is one of those things that&#039;s truly more impressive than advertised--first time I saw it was at night overhead flying in from Denver
with it all lit up--hadn&#039;t known they did that at night. Quite a sight! Fortunately I was first there when they had the original elegant wooden WPA era bldg &amp; cafeteria with that wall of glass that you see in Hitchcock&#039;s &quot;North by Northwest&quot; before they tore it down and put up that Albert Speer-like semi-Fascist stone and concrete monstrosity. The old structure blended with the site so well...Naturally I made all my business trips in the summer--can&#039;t think of why,  tho--heh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MAX/</p>
<p>I used to spend a bit of time in the &#8220;banana belt&#8221; at Rapid City&#8211;did quite a bit of business with Prairie States Life<br />
which is headquartered there. Mt. Rushmore is one of those things that&#8217;s truly more impressive than advertised&#8211;first time I saw it was at night overhead flying in from Denver<br />
with it all lit up&#8211;hadn&#8217;t known they did that at night. Quite a sight! Fortunately I was first there when they had the original elegant wooden WPA era bldg &amp; cafeteria with that wall of glass that you see in Hitchcock&#8217;s &#8220;North by Northwest&#8221; before they tore it down and put up that Albert Speer-like semi-Fascist stone and concrete monstrosity. The old structure blended with the site so well&#8230;Naturally I made all my business trips in the summer&#8211;can&#8217;t think of why,  tho&#8211;heh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MaxDamage</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2009/01/08/the-scent-of-a-woman/comment-page-1/#comment-310689</link>
		<dc:creator>MaxDamage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 07:18:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/?p=7053#comment-310689</guid>
		<description>Kris asked, &quot;Max please, don’t paint all Easterners as elitists of the Ivy League persuasion. Some of us - like AW1Tim, B2, Snake Eater and myself - live on the east coast and don’t drink that Kool Aid.&quot;

Kris, I wasn&#039;t intending to paint with such a broad brush and I apologize if you felt I was painting out of the lines in the that regard.  However, I think we both know there are folks in the coastal urban areas that have no idea what the rest of us are like, and consider themselves our betters.  That was the group I was trying to reference.

I&#039;ve *met* these people.  My wife is an artist, we&#039;ve gone to gallery openings and such events in the past.  All black tie and small talk and eating cheese and drinking wine that tastes like, um, prune juice past the sell-by date.  Celebrities from the movies, newspapers, television all around, flashbulbs going off like triple-A around Hanoi.

I&#039;m not the brightest bulb in the chandelier, certainly not the most social of animals, but in all my travels I&#039;ve never felt as much a turd in a punch-bowl as at those gatherings.

Wasn&#039;t the dress or manners, it was the ignorance.  &quot;You&#039;re from?&quot;  &quot;South Dakota.&quot;

I could almost feel the chill in the air.  I wasn&#039;t one of them.  Half thought South Dakota was somewhere near Nevada, the other half was sure we were to the north but wasn&#039;t certain we had indoor plumbing.

It was most palpable by the media folks.  The only thing they knew about my state was that Tom Daschle wasn&#039;t re-elected.  Other than that, they were clueless.  One might think they&#039;d at least remember Mount Rushmore, or the Rosebud Indian Reservation, or perhaps a ballot issue to outlaw abortion.

Nope.  We&#039;re beneath notice.  We don&#039;t count.

Again, we&#039;re not of their tribe.  And each night I thank God that I&#039;m not of theirs.

  - Max</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kris asked, &#8220;Max please, don’t paint all Easterners as elitists of the Ivy League persuasion. Some of us &#8211; like AW1Tim, B2, Snake Eater and myself &#8211; live on the east coast and don’t drink that Kool Aid.&#8221;</p>
<p>Kris, I wasn&#8217;t intending to paint with such a broad brush and I apologize if you felt I was painting out of the lines in the that regard.  However, I think we both know there are folks in the coastal urban areas that have no idea what the rest of us are like, and consider themselves our betters.  That was the group I was trying to reference.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve *met* these people.  My wife is an artist, we&#8217;ve gone to gallery openings and such events in the past.  All black tie and small talk and eating cheese and drinking wine that tastes like, um, prune juice past the sell-by date.  Celebrities from the movies, newspapers, television all around, flashbulbs going off like triple-A around Hanoi.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not the brightest bulb in the chandelier, certainly not the most social of animals, but in all my travels I&#8217;ve never felt as much a turd in a punch-bowl as at those gatherings.</p>
<p>Wasn&#8217;t the dress or manners, it was the ignorance.  &#8220;You&#8217;re from?&#8221;  &#8220;South Dakota.&#8221;</p>
<p>I could almost feel the chill in the air.  I wasn&#8217;t one of them.  Half thought South Dakota was somewhere near Nevada, the other half was sure we were to the north but wasn&#8217;t certain we had indoor plumbing.</p>
<p>It was most palpable by the media folks.  The only thing they knew about my state was that Tom Daschle wasn&#8217;t re-elected.  Other than that, they were clueless.  One might think they&#8217;d at least remember Mount Rushmore, or the Rosebud Indian Reservation, or perhaps a ballot issue to outlaw abortion.</p>
<p>Nope.  We&#8217;re beneath notice.  We don&#8217;t count.</p>
<p>Again, we&#8217;re not of their tribe.  And each night I thank God that I&#8217;m not of theirs.</p>
<p>  &#8211; Max</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amy</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2009/01/08/the-scent-of-a-woman/comment-page-1/#comment-310648</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 06:02:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/?p=7053#comment-310648</guid>
		<description>Mr. Mongo, I didn&#039;t say that Palin was unqualified for the vice presidency (I believe that she was). The arguments that she was politically inexperienced and unfamiliar with foreign policy issues were weak ones given the nature of the task that was before her: to act as a popular &quot;outsider&quot; who could help push fiscal reform measures through the senate. But weak arguments are not malicious ones. Her inexperience was a short-coming. Was it an important one? Not really, but it was certainly not beneath voter consideration, and in an election where people were parsing the exact nature of a dinner gathering held for Obama at the Ayers&#039; residence, you could hardly expect it to go without comment. Obama&#039;s inexperience was also a short-coming, but for voters (such as myself, yes) who agreed with his policy positions and gained a sense of his style of leadership through his conduct during the campaign, it was not enough to tip us into the McCain camp. My comment about &quot;ugliness&quot; related to Palin&#039;s family was meant to refer to the personal attacks  she experienced because of her daughter&#039;s pregnancy and the rumors about her not being the mother of her youngest son. Those were utterly offensive and uncalled for. Though less personal, I think that the rumors and accusations that Obama is a non-citizen who &quot;pals around with terrorists&quot; were on the same level of offensiveness.

Mr. Xenophon, I hope that I wasn&#039;t speaking with gall when I referred to the narrowness---I meant in the sense of &quot;focus&quot;---of Palin&#039;s *policy interests*, not her experience. In the interviews that I watched, she clearly was not familiar with many of the economic or foreign policy questions on which she commented. With respect to Russia, she could not describe any sort of interaction that she had had with Russian officials during her tenure in office. Again, I don&#039;t think that this mattered because she was not going to play a lead role on those issues, but every weakness comes in for a great deal of attention during a national campaign, especially when the candidate tries to unconvincingly demonstrate that she has no such weakness. It&#039;s not about malice; it&#039;s about probing for weakness in a candidate and seeing if you can hit upon something that captures the public&#039;s attention.

Oh, and I forgot in my last comment to thank Lex for what he wrote. I have long enjoyed reading this blog both for the strength of its content and the civility of its language.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Mongo, I didn&#8217;t say that Palin was unqualified for the vice presidency (I believe that she was). The arguments that she was politically inexperienced and unfamiliar with foreign policy issues were weak ones given the nature of the task that was before her: to act as a popular &#8220;outsider&#8221; who could help push fiscal reform measures through the senate. But weak arguments are not malicious ones. Her inexperience was a short-coming. Was it an important one? Not really, but it was certainly not beneath voter consideration, and in an election where people were parsing the exact nature of a dinner gathering held for Obama at the Ayers&#8217; residence, you could hardly expect it to go without comment. Obama&#8217;s inexperience was also a short-coming, but for voters (such as myself, yes) who agreed with his policy positions and gained a sense of his style of leadership through his conduct during the campaign, it was not enough to tip us into the McCain camp. My comment about &#8220;ugliness&#8221; related to Palin&#8217;s family was meant to refer to the personal attacks  she experienced because of her daughter&#8217;s pregnancy and the rumors about her not being the mother of her youngest son. Those were utterly offensive and uncalled for. Though less personal, I think that the rumors and accusations that Obama is a non-citizen who &#8220;pals around with terrorists&#8221; were on the same level of offensiveness.</p>
<p>Mr. Xenophon, I hope that I wasn&#8217;t speaking with gall when I referred to the narrowness&#8212;I meant in the sense of &#8220;focus&#8221;&#8212;of Palin&#8217;s *policy interests*, not her experience. In the interviews that I watched, she clearly was not familiar with many of the economic or foreign policy questions on which she commented. With respect to Russia, she could not describe any sort of interaction that she had had with Russian officials during her tenure in office. Again, I don&#8217;t think that this mattered because she was not going to play a lead role on those issues, but every weakness comes in for a great deal of attention during a national campaign, especially when the candidate tries to unconvincingly demonstrate that she has no such weakness. It&#8217;s not about malice; it&#8217;s about probing for weakness in a candidate and seeing if you can hit upon something that captures the public&#8217;s attention.</p>
<p>Oh, and I forgot in my last comment to thank Lex for what he wrote. I have long enjoyed reading this blog both for the strength of its content and the civility of its language.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blackeagle603</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2009/01/08/the-scent-of-a-woman/comment-page-1/#comment-310636</link>
		<dc:creator>Blackeagle603</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 05:33:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/?p=7053#comment-310636</guid>
		<description>&quot;Sarah in Chains&quot; era of the campaign.


Yo Virg,
Re: #31

&quot;First, she immediately interviewed with Couric, a major mistake on two levels. One, she had just said she cared not a whit for the opinions of people like Couric, and thus by the simple act of acquesing to the interview in the first place, &quot;

So V-man, I she didn&#039;t make that call about interviewing with perky Kate.  McCain&#039;s campaign made that call. The staff was doing their level best to &quot;handle&quot; her.   

There was a month or more of &#039;Sarah in chains&#039; when it went really sour and the worst of the MSM damage to her was done.

Then the whole &#039;unleash Sarah&#039; cry went up, they turned her loose and she started firing on all 8 cylinders -- SNL appearances, Drill Baby Drill and so on.

Bottomline?  McCain and his staff was huge part of the problem.

Sarah on her own?  Does fine. Just like in this most recent interview.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Sarah in Chains&#8221; era of the campaign.</p>
<p>Yo Virg,<br />
Re: #31</p>
<p>&#8220;First, she immediately interviewed with Couric, a major mistake on two levels. One, she had just said she cared not a whit for the opinions of people like Couric, and thus by the simple act of acquesing to the interview in the first place, &#8221;</p>
<p>So V-man, I she didn&#8217;t make that call about interviewing with perky Kate.  McCain&#8217;s campaign made that call. The staff was doing their level best to &#8220;handle&#8221; her.   </p>
<p>There was a month or more of &#8216;Sarah in chains&#8217; when it went really sour and the worst of the MSM damage to her was done.</p>
<p>Then the whole &#8216;unleash Sarah&#8217; cry went up, they turned her loose and she started firing on all 8 cylinders &#8212; SNL appearances, Drill Baby Drill and so on.</p>
<p>Bottomline?  McCain and his staff was huge part of the problem.</p>
<p>Sarah on her own?  Does fine. Just like in this most recent interview.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

