<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: You Be the Judge</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neptunuslex.com/2009/01/29/you-be-the-judge/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2009/01/29/you-be-the-judge/</link>
	<description>The unbearable lightness of Lex. Enjoy!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:43:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Travis Bickle</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2009/01/29/you-be-the-judge/comment-page-1/#comment-323186</link>
		<dc:creator>Travis Bickle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 02:09:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/?p=7470#comment-323186</guid>
		<description>Balls. Big Ones.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Balls. Big Ones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nose</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2009/01/29/you-be-the-judge/comment-page-1/#comment-319621</link>
		<dc:creator>Nose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 22:49:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/?p=7470#comment-319621</guid>
		<description>Where is Snakey when we need his legal expertise?

Couple of thoughts - I always assumed that military judges WERE considered Federal Judges.  Is that not correct?

Larry S. I am not a lawyer either (and might not admit it if&#039;n I were) but I believe that double jeopardy only applies if you have been tried and found not guilty.  You can be charged, have charges dropped and be charged again.  I may be wrong, I often am.  Also, if they don&#039;t proceed with the pending trials, that does not mean they have to drop charges, they only have to change venue...

Someone correct me.  (My wife isn&#039;t here to do it.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where is Snakey when we need his legal expertise?</p>
<p>Couple of thoughts &#8211; I always assumed that military judges WERE considered Federal Judges.  Is that not correct?</p>
<p>Larry S. I am not a lawyer either (and might not admit it if&#8217;n I were) but I believe that double jeopardy only applies if you have been tried and found not guilty.  You can be charged, have charges dropped and be charged again.  I may be wrong, I often am.  Also, if they don&#8217;t proceed with the pending trials, that does not mean they have to drop charges, they only have to change venue&#8230;</p>
<p>Someone correct me.  (My wife isn&#8217;t here to do it.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SSG Jeff (USAR)</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2009/01/29/you-be-the-judge/comment-page-1/#comment-319555</link>
		<dc:creator>SSG Jeff (USAR)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 18:21:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/?p=7470#comment-319555</guid>
		<description>I wonder if the Judge will try to argue that it&#039;s an illegal order?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if the Judge will try to argue that it&#8217;s an illegal order?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RetRsvMike</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2009/01/29/you-be-the-judge/comment-page-1/#comment-319487</link>
		<dc:creator>RetRsvMike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 14:14:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/?p=7470#comment-319487</guid>
		<description>Two thoughts on this topic:

1st: congratulations to Judge Pohl on his pending retirement in current grade, and thanks for his honorable service.

2nd: much like the captain of a ship at sea, there is nothing quite so close to being sovereign lord of all one surveys as being a judge on his bench.  boards of inquiry and appeals courts may feel differently after the fact, but hizzoner is the skipper underway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two thoughts on this topic:</p>
<p>1st: congratulations to Judge Pohl on his pending retirement in current grade, and thanks for his honorable service.</p>
<p>2nd: much like the captain of a ship at sea, there is nothing quite so close to being sovereign lord of all one surveys as being a judge on his bench.  boards of inquiry and appeals courts may feel differently after the fact, but hizzoner is the skipper underway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AW1 Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2009/01/29/you-be-the-judge/comment-page-1/#comment-319361</link>
		<dc:creator>AW1 Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 05:03:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/?p=7470#comment-319361</guid>
		<description>I found this interesting comment over at FoxNews. Seems the DoD already grasps which side of the bread the butter is on:


Pentagon spokesman Geoff Morrell said Thursday that Pohl would soon be told to comply with Obama&#039;s executive order.

&quot;All I can really tell you is that this department will be in full compliance with the president&#039;s executive order,&quot; Morrell said at a news briefing. &quot;There is no ifs, ands or buts about that.&quot; 

&quot;The president has signed an executive order and that sort of puts all this on hold as we go about and review a number of things related to Gitmo, our detention operations, our interrogation procedures,&quot; he continued. 

&quot;And so, while that executive order is in force and effect, trust me that there will be no proceedings continuing down at Gitmo with military commissions,&quot; he added.

Heh...

   Someone&#039;s feeling all atwiddle and duckbumps about the era of HopeNChange.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found this interesting comment over at FoxNews. Seems the DoD already grasps which side of the bread the butter is on:</p>
<p>Pentagon spokesman Geoff Morrell said Thursday that Pohl would soon be told to comply with Obama&#8217;s executive order.</p>
<p>&#8220;All I can really tell you is that this department will be in full compliance with the president&#8217;s executive order,&#8221; Morrell said at a news briefing. &#8220;There is no ifs, ands or buts about that.&#8221; </p>
<p>&#8220;The president has signed an executive order and that sort of puts all this on hold as we go about and review a number of things related to Gitmo, our detention operations, our interrogation procedures,&#8221; he continued. </p>
<p>&#8220;And so, while that executive order is in force and effect, trust me that there will be no proceedings continuing down at Gitmo with military commissions,&#8221; he added.</p>
<p>Heh&#8230;</p>
<p>   Someone&#8217;s feeling all atwiddle and duckbumps about the era of HopeNChange.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry Sheldon</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2009/01/29/you-be-the-judge/comment-page-1/#comment-319349</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry Sheldon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 04:07:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/?p=7470#comment-319349</guid>
		<description>And I am not a lawyer, but it would seem (think &quot;double jeopardy&quot;) that once a proceeding has begun, the prosecution side has no choice but to proceed, or drop the charges.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And I am not a lawyer, but it would seem (think &#8220;double jeopardy&#8221;) that once a proceeding has begun, the prosecution side has no choice but to proceed, or drop the charges.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

