Hot Mic

Omakase

Amazon Search
«  
  »

“Transnational Legal Process”

By lex, on March 31st, 2009

Yeah, I’d never heard of it either.

I, for one, welcome our new transnational overlords.

Share
March 31st, 2009 | Tags: | Category: Politics and Culture

19 comments to “Transnational Legal Process”

  • Jay Season
    March 31, 2009 at 10:38 am

    >> defender of America’s sovereignty

    U.S. Constitution – What Constitution?

    I welcome the transnational Supreme Court Justices next.

  • AW1 Tim
    March 31, 2009 at 10:51 am

    Yeah, and think that this fellow is likely to be Omama’s nominee for the SCOTUS. Shudder…..

  • virgil xenophon
    March 31, 2009 at 11:29 am

    He’s not the only one, sports-fans. Yale is full of ‘em. Hit the site “Balkanization” which is a legal blog run by Yale law professor Jack Balkin. Just scroll down through the last oh, year or so, to get a flavor. REAL big on arrest and trial of Bush, Cheney, et al. (to include legal advisers like John Yoo, now a professor at Berkeley, of all places) for the usual assortment of “crimes” against the constitution and civil liberties re: “Torture” and “eavesdropping.”

    On second thought, no one here need visit, really, I’m sure everyone here already has a real mental picture of what they will find…

  • DE644
    March 31, 2009 at 12:36 pm

    I for one DO NOT welcome the Transnational Overlords. One if by land or two if by sea!

  • Big Daddy
    March 31, 2009 at 1:12 pm

    He’s a big fan of Sharia law, right? Thinks we as a nation should fallow it.

    Isn’t Sharia a RELIGIOUS LAW? Wouldn’t that constitute a mingling of church and state?

    Oh wait. Almost forgot. The rules don’t apply to the savior and his apostles.

    • xformed
      April 1, 2009 at 6:36 pm

      No…You have it wrong. They have been a “minority” (ask them, they’ll tell you) so long in World history, now we have to let them have their way for a period of time to relieve their oppressed feelings.

      To be serious: I’ve been concerned for years that the NOW has been either MIA, or just UA in this entire discussion. I had delusions of hundreds of thousands of wymen flocking to USMC Recruiting stations, begging for time at PI, and to be sent to the Middle East, to…you know…”take them to task (to be polite)” for the centuries of misogyny…and then I woke up in the real world and found we are here.

  • Marianne Matthews
    March 31, 2009 at 1:49 pm

    Here’s another fascinating language tidbit, issued by the one guy in Mr. Obama’s White House who studied Semantics in college. The Global War on Terror terminology, which is very clear, if somewhat frightening, is now to be designated the “overseas contingency operation.” Not only is this so deliberately unclear that inquiring minds can’t even figure out what it means, try saying it out loud three times, then going off to do something else, then trying to recall what the hell it was an hour later. I’ve tried this three times in the past three days, and I just can’t remember what the phrase is. Joseph Goebbels would be proud of these guys.

    I just find it very scary, and reminiscent of George Orwell.

    Marianne

  • Edward
    March 31, 2009 at 1:51 pm

    And just what does the “H” in “BHO” stand for?

  • Tom G.
    March 31, 2009 at 3:42 pm

    Horsefeathers.

  • Byron Audler
    March 31, 2009 at 4:05 pm

    Horsesh!t.

  • Quartermaster
    March 31, 2009 at 4:58 pm

    I’d like to be Transnational warlord. I’ll erect a post on the Mall and y’all can name the people I’ll have tied to it. As warlord, I’d get first pick.

    I can’t name the one I’d want as the Secret Service would make a visit.

    Guys, catch up on your reading in biblical prophecy. The US isn’t there. Most everyone else is mentioned or inferred, the US ain’t. Any guesses why?

  • Alo Konsen
    March 31, 2009 at 7:08 pm

    Hey, Lex, don’t blame me. I voted for Kodos.

  • PeterGunn
    March 31, 2009 at 9:16 pm

    We’re 2+ months into the “Big O’s” administration and his incomprehensible beat just goes on… Whatever are we in for in the next 6 months, next year?

    Unconstituionally opinionated jurists, Speakers of the House who espouse breaking our laws, run out of money?, just throw another trillion into the economy, Senators in the pocket of mortgage and insurance companies regulating same, calling Supreme Court Justices liars and of course the late-night talk show tour.

    One good thing? Well, at least we don’t have to pay the IRS… at least until we get nominated for a cabinet post.

  • Ltjg Andrew
    March 31, 2009 at 10:43 pm

    @Quartermaster: my best answer to your question is that 2-3000 years ago North America was nothing but wilderness sparsely populated with savages. Add to the fact that no one in the Persian or later Roman world knew the continent even existed. So on the first count, not worth an angel mentioning it to a prophet, and second count no one would understand or care if said angel did.

    • Quartermaster
      April 1, 2009 at 9:11 am

      There would have been a point IF the US were involved. That’s just the way God works. he knows the future in detail and tells His people, just as He told Abraham about the fate of Sodom.

  • Liz
    April 1, 2009 at 5:15 am

    April fools!

    …or maybe not.

  • Edward
    April 1, 2009 at 7:31 am

    Check out the Bloomberg article

    http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=armOzfkwtCA4&refer=worldwide

    The Federal Reserve has committed to a sum total that equals our GDP of last year.

    Weimar Republic inflation, here we come.

  • b2
    April 1, 2009 at 11:32 am

    That feller looks sorta well fed for a trans …whatever. Combine that with a rookie pres and we’re in for a rough ride America!

    http://townhall.com/columnists/ThomasSowell/2009/03/31/a_rookie_president?page=full&comments=true

    b2
eXTReMe Tracker

View My Stats