<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Distractions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neptunuslex.com/2009/04/11/distractions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2009/04/11/distractions/</link>
	<description>The unbearable lightness of Lex. Enjoy!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 04:27:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skippy-san</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2009/04/11/distractions/comment-page-1/#comment-355350</link>
		<dc:creator>Skippy-san</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 23:38:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/?p=8892#comment-355350</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;President Obama granted two separate requests from the Defense Department to go forward with a military operation to rescue Captain Richard Phillips, an administration official tells CNN.

Obama granted the authority to use appropriate force with the focus on saving and protecting Phillips’ life. The requests were made by the Pentagon Friday and Saturday. For technical reasons, authority was granted two different times, according to the official, because different U.S. forces moved in the region near the coast of Somalia.&lt;/em&gt;

And no he would not have made that publicly known-but neither would C5F simply wait and make it up as they went along. They&#039;ve been thinking this through for while now.

But thanks for the indignant sneer anyway. :-).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>President Obama granted two separate requests from the Defense Department to go forward with a military operation to rescue Captain Richard Phillips, an administration official tells CNN.</p>
<p>Obama granted the authority to use appropriate force with the focus on saving and protecting Phillips’ life. The requests were made by the Pentagon Friday and Saturday. For technical reasons, authority was granted two different times, according to the official, because different U.S. forces moved in the region near the coast of Somalia.</em></p>
<p>And no he would not have made that publicly known-but neither would C5F simply wait and make it up as they went along. They&#8217;ve been thinking this through for while now.</p>
<p>But thanks for the indignant sneer anyway. <img src='http://www.neptunuslex.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skippy-san</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2009/04/11/distractions/comment-page-1/#comment-355342</link>
		<dc:creator>Skippy-san</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 23:26:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/?p=8892#comment-355342</guid>
		<description>Not nervous at all. Unlike a lot of people I knew pretty much what I was voting for-and what I was voting against.  if John McCain and been able to promise a quick withdrawal from Iraq and had a running mate that was not a looney toon-I might have voted for him. Since neither of those two pre-condintions could be met, I voted my conscience.

I support an end to the Bush tax cuts, favor increased domestic spending, and don&#039;t see Gates FY-10 DOD budget as gutting defense.  I believe that most of the blame for our defense deficiencies can be laid directly at the feet of the wars and stupid decisions by civilian and uniformed DOD leadership . 

 I also find its pretty amazing that all the blame for everything related to anything falls on the current administration when most of the root causes started back in the late nineties and were accelerated by the actions of the Bush administration.

Has Obama made some mistakes? Yes. he&#039;s got to face down his own party in the form of Nancy Pelosi and he&#039;s not found a good vehicle to do so-even though he had a great opportunity by vetoing the omnibus bill.

But I also won&#039;t be throwing away perfectly good tea bags worrying about things that have not yet come to pass-or complaining about higher taxes that I have not yet-nor will have to in the future-pay.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not nervous at all. Unlike a lot of people I knew pretty much what I was voting for-and what I was voting against.  if John McCain and been able to promise a quick withdrawal from Iraq and had a running mate that was not a looney toon-I might have voted for him. Since neither of those two pre-condintions could be met, I voted my conscience.</p>
<p>I support an end to the Bush tax cuts, favor increased domestic spending, and don&#8217;t see Gates FY-10 DOD budget as gutting defense.  I believe that most of the blame for our defense deficiencies can be laid directly at the feet of the wars and stupid decisions by civilian and uniformed DOD leadership . </p>
<p> I also find its pretty amazing that all the blame for everything related to anything falls on the current administration when most of the root causes started back in the late nineties and were accelerated by the actions of the Bush administration.</p>
<p>Has Obama made some mistakes? Yes. he&#8217;s got to face down his own party in the form of Nancy Pelosi and he&#8217;s not found a good vehicle to do so-even though he had a great opportunity by vetoing the omnibus bill.</p>
<p>But I also won&#8217;t be throwing away perfectly good tea bags worrying about things that have not yet come to pass-or complaining about higher taxes that I have not yet-nor will have to in the future-pay.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Snyder</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2009/04/11/distractions/comment-page-1/#comment-355180</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Snyder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 13:46:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/?p=8892#comment-355180</guid>
		<description>Babs, apparently Skippy prefers to switch the subject once his &quot;exaggeration &quot;  on ROE is challenged.  Or, more accurately though less kindly, he pulled a &quot;Biden&quot;.

I would think that if BHO had issued a &quot;guns free&quot; type of ROE to our troops, that President Erkle would have made this ROE publicly known.  

Skippy, surely you did not mean to use the WSJ article comments you quoted to determine what the ROE is?  The link is http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123940302250809641.html.  

I read the article a few times, closed my eyes tightly, clicked my heels twice; still could not discern what the ROE is from the article.  BTW, &quot;The Barbarian Coast&quot; was a well chosen title for the article.

As you well know, there is almost ALWAYS more that cannot, or at least should not, be talked about on any sensitive topic or situation.  

Nothing I have read states that our troops have been given a free hand (ROE) to do as they see fit to deal with the pirates.  

Team BHO/Biden would be proud of you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Babs, apparently Skippy prefers to switch the subject once his &#8220;exaggeration &#8221;  on ROE is challenged.  Or, more accurately though less kindly, he pulled a &#8220;Biden&#8221;.</p>
<p>I would think that if BHO had issued a &#8220;guns free&#8221; type of ROE to our troops, that President Erkle would have made this ROE publicly known.  </p>
<p>Skippy, surely you did not mean to use the WSJ article comments you quoted to determine what the ROE is?  The link is <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123940302250809641.html" rel="nofollow">http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123940302250809641.html</a>.  </p>
<p>I read the article a few times, closed my eyes tightly, clicked my heels twice; still could not discern what the ROE is from the article.  BTW, &#8220;The Barbarian Coast&#8221; was a well chosen title for the article.</p>
<p>As you well know, there is almost ALWAYS more that cannot, or at least should not, be talked about on any sensitive topic or situation.  </p>
<p>Nothing I have read states that our troops have been given a free hand (ROE) to do as they see fit to deal with the pirates.  </p>
<p>Team BHO/Biden would be proud of you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Byron Audler</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2009/04/11/distractions/comment-page-1/#comment-355165</link>
		<dc:creator>Byron Audler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 12:56:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/?p=8892#comment-355165</guid>
		<description>Skippy, these are facts not arguable:

Obama is not to blame for the piracy.

Obama IS to blame for lack of action for his part in the rescue of an American citizen after an attack on United States property, aka, a flagged American ship. 

No matter what party, no matter what person, no matter his history with your issues, the President is that man with the big fuzzy ones responsible for the safety of American citizens. Since you were one of the instruments providing protection of those citizens, you should understand this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Skippy, these are facts not arguable:</p>
<p>Obama is not to blame for the piracy.</p>
<p>Obama IS to blame for lack of action for his part in the rescue of an American citizen after an attack on United States property, aka, a flagged American ship. </p>
<p>No matter what party, no matter what person, no matter his history with your issues, the President is that man with the big fuzzy ones responsible for the safety of American citizens. Since you were one of the instruments providing protection of those citizens, you should understand this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zane</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2009/04/11/distractions/comment-page-1/#comment-355118</link>
		<dc:creator>Zane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 10:31:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/?p=8892#comment-355118</guid>
		<description>VX, not to disillusion you, but I am not someone of a certain level of command authority / responsibility.  As an O3, I battled corrupt O6s.  I won the legal  battle, but my advancement has ended at O4, and with the Navy desperately looking to squeeze out as many sailors as possible in order to buy something / anything over the next several years, I am beginning to have doubts of retiring even at that grade.  From my experience since late 2001, however, I have only observed that breaking the rules has never won anyone favor from seniors, however many lives it has saved or objectives it attains.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>VX, not to disillusion you, but I am not someone of a certain level of command authority / responsibility.  As an O3, I battled corrupt O6s.  I won the legal  battle, but my advancement has ended at O4, and with the Navy desperately looking to squeeze out as many sailors as possible in order to buy something / anything over the next several years, I am beginning to have doubts of retiring even at that grade.  From my experience since late 2001, however, I have only observed that breaking the rules has never won anyone favor from seniors, however many lives it has saved or objectives it attains.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: virgil xenophon</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2009/04/11/distractions/comment-page-1/#comment-355105</link>
		<dc:creator>virgil xenophon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 09:46:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/?p=8892#comment-355105</guid>
		<description>Zane/
 While warming to the subject, let me pose this question to you as someone who has reached a certain level of command authority/responsibility and whose active duty service is far, far more recent than mine. In the 1939 Louisiana Army War Game Joe Stillwell garnered himself the #1 rating for generalship as evaluated by George Marshall in no small part because he broke the rules and lept off 1 hr early to start the games in order to get the jump on the opfor.  What do you think would happen to a general that pulled that stunt in the same situation today, given the state-of-play of our current command structure and the current ethos/weltanschauung of the profession?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zane/<br />
 While warming to the subject, let me pose this question to you as someone who has reached a certain level of command authority/responsibility and whose active duty service is far, far more recent than mine. In the 1939 Louisiana Army War Game Joe Stillwell garnered himself the #1 rating for generalship as evaluated by George Marshall in no small part because he broke the rules and lept off 1 hr early to start the games in order to get the jump on the opfor.  What do you think would happen to a general that pulled that stunt in the same situation today, given the state-of-play of our current command structure and the current ethos/weltanschauung of the profession?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

