<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Road Trip?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neptunuslex.com/2009/06/29/road-trip/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2009/06/29/road-trip/</link>
	<description>The unbearable lightness of Lex. Enjoy!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 01:07:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grumpy</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2009/06/29/road-trip/comment-page-1/#comment-380954</link>
		<dc:creator>Grumpy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 03:27:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/?p=10330#comment-380954</guid>
		<description>&quot;Forrestal in Flames: Explosions Aboard USS Forestal&quot;
http://pbma.nasa.gov/pbma_main_cid_584

This has been the primary source of information. At no time, did I say, McCain was responsible for the fire. In fact, according to the reports that I have read, show the first Zuni Missle hitting McCain&#039;s A-4 Skyhawk&#039;s fuel tank. The missle hit it with kinetic energy, no detonation. This hit ripped a major hole in the tank, dumping the fuel on the flight deck. The fuel is ignited by fire from the tail of the rocket. Take the time to read the report. This shows some of the official views, from the Navy. NASA started doing studies on this Nation&#039;s Systemic Failures, this is one of them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Forrestal in Flames: Explosions Aboard USS Forestal&#8221;<br />
<a href="http://pbma.nasa.gov/pbma_main_cid_584" rel="nofollow">http://pbma.nasa.gov/pbma_main_cid_584</a></p>
<p>This has been the primary source of information. At no time, did I say, McCain was responsible for the fire. In fact, according to the reports that I have read, show the first Zuni Missle hitting McCain&#8217;s A-4 Skyhawk&#8217;s fuel tank. The missle hit it with kinetic energy, no detonation. This hit ripped a major hole in the tank, dumping the fuel on the flight deck. The fuel is ignited by fire from the tail of the rocket. Take the time to read the report. This shows some of the official views, from the Navy. NASA started doing studies on this Nation&#8217;s Systemic Failures, this is one of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gmac</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2009/06/29/road-trip/comment-page-1/#comment-380512</link>
		<dc:creator>Gmac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 23:52:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/?p=10330#comment-380512</guid>
		<description>Ya, it would be nice if it improved our nations security but pushing the national debt to new highs both as a percentage of the GDP as well as actual monetary expenditures now and in the next few years strikes me as one of the most craven examples of a politician paying off the special interest groups that got him elected and at the same time destroying the base of our economic engine that drives the country.

I certainly do agree that both parties created the problem but the fact of the matter is the ones most responsible for it are still at the helm.

I will still insist that &#039;The Won&#039; has his finger prints on the spending bills passed before he became president and more directly afterward when his signature can be seen as evidence on the documents signatory lines making it law.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ya, it would be nice if it improved our nations security but pushing the national debt to new highs both as a percentage of the GDP as well as actual monetary expenditures now and in the next few years strikes me as one of the most craven examples of a politician paying off the special interest groups that got him elected and at the same time destroying the base of our economic engine that drives the country.</p>
<p>I certainly do agree that both parties created the problem but the fact of the matter is the ones most responsible for it are still at the helm.</p>
<p>I will still insist that &#8216;The Won&#8217; has his finger prints on the spending bills passed before he became president and more directly afterward when his signature can be seen as evidence on the documents signatory lines making it law.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2009/06/29/road-trip/comment-page-1/#comment-380386</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 11:42:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/?p=10330#comment-380386</guid>
		<description>Well, Mr. Grumpy -- once again, you are wrong.  McCain was in the cockpit of his A4 when the fire started.  The point isn&#039;t whether you repeated that shibboleth --  the point is that it is as fanciful as your idea that Bush 43 started OIF to be &quot;known as a &#039;War Time President&#039;,  the same was true of his father&quot;.  Both are fantasies of the unhinged left -- and you place yourself squarely in their camp if you repeat either.

As far as me admitting when I&#039;m wrong -- you missed it.  Did just that on Monday.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, Mr. Grumpy &#8212; once again, you are wrong.  McCain was in the cockpit of his A4 when the fire started.  The point isn&#8217;t whether you repeated that shibboleth &#8212;  the point is that it is as fanciful as your idea that Bush 43 started OIF to be &#8220;known as a &#8216;War Time President&#8217;,  the same was true of his father&#8221;.  Both are fantasies of the unhinged left &#8212; and you place yourself squarely in their camp if you repeat either.</p>
<p>As far as me admitting when I&#8217;m wrong &#8212; you missed it.  Did just that on Monday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grumpy</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2009/06/29/road-trip/comment-page-1/#comment-380339</link>
		<dc:creator>Grumpy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 05:06:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/?p=10330#comment-380339</guid>
		<description>@To All:  It surely appears that I am the center of attention. First of all, I don&#039;t believe at any point, I said, I supported the Obama spending. I wasn&#039;t exactly happy about the bailout of the banks and auto industry. But, hopefully, as they claim, they will be able to pay it back. Then it will actually be an investment, not spending, but there must be an actual return will be greater than the original investment, plus appropriate interest. Me, I don&#039;t believe it will work. Any choice we make will *suck, big time.*

@Scott,  I don&#039;t remember saying, &quot;McCain started the Forrestal fire.&quot; From what I understand, he was on the flight deck of the Forrestal, a missile misfired. At the time, his feet were actually touching the flight deck, there was no way for him to intentionally or accidentally set it off.  After the fire, he was transferred to the Oriskany, where he served until he was shot down. The rest is history.

@Gmac, only if it actually improves the security of this Nation, here.

@davreg, you raise two points, let&#039;s start with you second clause first. I would submit to you to go to the last sentence of the first paragraph. &quot;Any choice we make will suck big time.&quot; It does not justify it, but it is still fact, in my view.

On the first part, you proved me wrong, George W. Bush served his time at Houston for his Active Texas Air National Guard. He then moved to Birmingham, Alabama to serve his Inactive Reserve Time. He received an Honorable Discharge.

@To All: davreg and Scott were right to challenge on facts. On the first part of davreg&#039;s challenge, the facts required that I admit that I was wrong. This is how we learn. The big questions become something like this. What about you? Are you going to admit when you&#039;re wrong?


V/R Grumpy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@To All:  It surely appears that I am the center of attention. First of all, I don&#8217;t believe at any point, I said, I supported the Obama spending. I wasn&#8217;t exactly happy about the bailout of the banks and auto industry. But, hopefully, as they claim, they will be able to pay it back. Then it will actually be an investment, not spending, but there must be an actual return will be greater than the original investment, plus appropriate interest. Me, I don&#8217;t believe it will work. Any choice we make will *suck, big time.*</p>
<p>@Scott,  I don&#8217;t remember saying, &#8220;McCain started the Forrestal fire.&#8221; From what I understand, he was on the flight deck of the Forrestal, a missile misfired. At the time, his feet were actually touching the flight deck, there was no way for him to intentionally or accidentally set it off.  After the fire, he was transferred to the Oriskany, where he served until he was shot down. The rest is history.</p>
<p>@Gmac, only if it actually improves the security of this Nation, here.</p>
<p>@davreg, you raise two points, let&#8217;s start with you second clause first. I would submit to you to go to the last sentence of the first paragraph. &#8220;Any choice we make will suck big time.&#8221; It does not justify it, but it is still fact, in my view.</p>
<p>On the first part, you proved me wrong, George W. Bush served his time at Houston for his Active Texas Air National Guard. He then moved to Birmingham, Alabama to serve his Inactive Reserve Time. He received an Honorable Discharge.</p>
<p>@To All: davreg and Scott were right to challenge on facts. On the first part of davreg&#8217;s challenge, the facts required that I admit that I was wrong. This is how we learn. The big questions become something like this. What about you? Are you going to admit when you&#8217;re wrong?</p>
<p>V/R Grumpy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quartermaster</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2009/06/29/road-trip/comment-page-1/#comment-380300</link>
		<dc:creator>Quartermaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 01:35:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/?p=10330#comment-380300</guid>
		<description>If one compares the risk to pilots in the Texas ANG at the time, with the risk AF pilots ran in &#039;nam, the ANG pilots were at greater risk than in &#039;nam. Also, the interceptor that Bush flew didn&#039;t have that great of a safety record either. Many try to paint Bush as a coward because he served in the ANG. The opposite actually the truth.

Anyone familiar with the National Guard also knows that what Dubya was allowed was not uncommon in the NG.

Personally, I&#039;d like to chose &quot;none of the above.&quot; The left never allows such things when it&#039;s done for our own good. If you don&#039;t think it is for your own good, just ask and they will tell you it&#039;s so, and that will settle it for anyone as insane as they.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If one compares the risk to pilots in the Texas ANG at the time, with the risk AF pilots ran in &#8216;nam, the ANG pilots were at greater risk than in &#8216;nam. Also, the interceptor that Bush flew didn&#8217;t have that great of a safety record either. Many try to paint Bush as a coward because he served in the ANG. The opposite actually the truth.</p>
<p>Anyone familiar with the National Guard also knows that what Dubya was allowed was not uncommon in the NG.</p>
<p>Personally, I&#8217;d like to chose &#8220;none of the above.&#8221; The left never allows such things when it&#8217;s done for our own good. If you don&#8217;t think it is for your own good, just ask and they will tell you it&#8217;s so, and that will settle it for anyone as insane as they.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gmac</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2009/06/29/road-trip/comment-page-1/#comment-380241</link>
		<dc:creator>Gmac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 23:54:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/?p=10330#comment-380241</guid>
		<description>Told ya it was a white knuckle ride Lex...

So Grumpy, maybe you can explain the actual spending that he both voted on as a senator and signed into law as president doesn&#039;t equal what the actual legislation states it does?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Told ya it was a white knuckle ride Lex&#8230;</p>
<p>So Grumpy, maybe you can explain the actual spending that he both voted on as a senator and signed into law as president doesn&#8217;t equal what the actual legislation states it does?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

