<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: High Flight</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neptunuslex.com/2009/07/18/high-flight/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2009/07/18/high-flight/</link>
	<description>The unbearable lightness of Lex. Enjoy!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 13:42:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ELP</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2009/07/18/high-flight/comment-page-1/#comment-433689</link>
		<dc:creator>ELP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 11:32:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/?p=10591#comment-433689</guid>
		<description>Saw these a lot at Alconbury. U-2 ops are fascinating. Spent some time with a group of people-one of them being a U-2 pilot- going to Duxford on the weekends and helping to strip paint and pull old wires from a P-51 as part of some volunteer work. The then 17RW wing king had a MiG-17 kill from Vietnam when then flying F-105s a 17 just kind of drifted in front of his gun when he was pulling off a target. 

Great system and still versatile. You can retask these faster/better than a Global Hawk. The mission is still needed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saw these a lot at Alconbury. U-2 ops are fascinating. Spent some time with a group of people-one of them being a U-2 pilot- going to Duxford on the weekends and helping to strip paint and pull old wires from a P-51 as part of some volunteer work. The then 17RW wing king had a MiG-17 kill from Vietnam when then flying F-105s a 17 just kind of drifted in front of his gun when he was pulling off a target. </p>
<p>Great system and still versatile. You can retask these faster/better than a Global Hawk. The mission is still needed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MaxDamage</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2009/07/18/high-flight/comment-page-1/#comment-433429</link>
		<dc:creator>MaxDamage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 04:53:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/?p=10591#comment-433429</guid>
		<description>True, Tailspin.  Think about it, the fuel is the same but the amount of O2 available to burn it has lessened dramatically.  Thus, to maintain a proper fuel-air mixture with so much less air you simply insert less fuel.

        I&#039;d be interested to find what fuel consumption was on the SR-71 at altitude, it having to expend all sorts of power and hence fuel to remain at such a high speed.  The U2, though, being basically a slightly-powered glider, had no need for gratuitous thrust to remain at her top speed and altitude.

        The U2 and SR-71&#039;s were very well suited to specific missions, and they did them better than anything anybody ever came up with.  Gotta give the nod to the SR-71 though -- there&#039;s just something awfully sexy about being at the same altitude at mach 3+, and shock diamonds in the exhaust ain&#039;t nothing either.

  - Max</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True, Tailspin.  Think about it, the fuel is the same but the amount of O2 available to burn it has lessened dramatically.  Thus, to maintain a proper fuel-air mixture with so much less air you simply insert less fuel.</p>
<p>        I&#8217;d be interested to find what fuel consumption was on the SR-71 at altitude, it having to expend all sorts of power and hence fuel to remain at such a high speed.  The U2, though, being basically a slightly-powered glider, had no need for gratuitous thrust to remain at her top speed and altitude.</p>
<p>        The U2 and SR-71&#8217;s were very well suited to specific missions, and they did them better than anything anybody ever came up with.  Gotta give the nod to the SR-71 though &#8212; there&#8217;s just something awfully sexy about being at the same altitude at mach 3+, and shock diamonds in the exhaust ain&#8217;t nothing either.</p>
<p>  &#8211; Max</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steveH</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2009/07/18/high-flight/comment-page-1/#comment-433427</link>
		<dc:creator>steveH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 04:11:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/?p=10591#comment-433427</guid>
		<description>Used to have my office a couple blocks from Moffatt Field, you could see the big NASA wind tunnel out the window.

Back then, an U2 would launch mid-morning most days during the week, making a huge racket. They&#039;d recover later in the afternoon, and you could watch a pickup truck or two running down the runway parallel with the aircraft to catch the wing tip so it wouldn&#039;t drag.

Worked just fine the couple times I managed to catch a landing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Used to have my office a couple blocks from Moffatt Field, you could see the big NASA wind tunnel out the window.</p>
<p>Back then, an U2 would launch mid-morning most days during the week, making a huge racket. They&#8217;d recover later in the afternoon, and you could watch a pickup truck or two running down the runway parallel with the aircraft to catch the wing tip so it wouldn&#8217;t drag.</p>
<p>Worked just fine the couple times I managed to catch a landing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tailspin</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2009/07/18/high-flight/comment-page-1/#comment-433423</link>
		<dc:creator>Tailspin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 03:35:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/?p=10591#comment-433423</guid>
		<description>At altitude the Dragon lady burns less fuel than at idle on the ground, I&#039;m told.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At altitude the Dragon lady burns less fuel than at idle on the ground, I&#8217;m told.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vigil xenophon</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2009/07/18/high-flight/comment-page-1/#comment-433394</link>
		<dc:creator>vigil xenophon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 23:26:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/?p=10591#comment-433394</guid>
		<description>SJS/

Of course the reason the AF killed off the Blackbird is that it was coming out of their budgetary hide and during crunch time something had to go, while the U2 was a CIA/SRO budget deal (even those the AF flew), IIRC. That, and the fact it siphoned off some of our best pilots and isolated/stove-piped them such that it was hard to promote them in numbers to higher commands due to lack of the right punched staff school tickets, experience in larger commands, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SJS/</p>
<p>Of course the reason the AF killed off the Blackbird is that it was coming out of their budgetary hide and during crunch time something had to go, while the U2 was a CIA/SRO budget deal (even those the AF flew), IIRC. That, and the fact it siphoned off some of our best pilots and isolated/stove-piped them such that it was hard to promote them in numbers to higher commands due to lack of the right punched staff school tickets, experience in larger commands, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SpazSinbad</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2009/07/18/high-flight/comment-page-1/#comment-433389</link>
		<dc:creator>SpazSinbad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 22:54:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/?p=10591#comment-433389</guid>
		<description>Wrong thread error</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wrong thread error</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
