Omakase

Amazon Search

Where’s Melbourne?

By modern standards, the USS Kitty Hawk was not a particularly large aircraft carrier – at 80k tons dripping wet and a little under 1100 feet, she suffered by comparison to the Nimitz class, which is only a trifle longer but 20k tons heavier.

The HMAS Melbourne was in another class entirely.

khkmelb.

See if you can find her, ca. 1978.

Say what you will, those RAN pilots had marbles.

Share

29 comments to Where’s Melbourne?

  • Paul in BarneyFrankistan

    Hardly noticed it at first – distracted by all those Tomcats.

    What in the world is sitting on the starboard aft end of the Kitty Hawk’s flight deck? Looks like something with straight, fairly fat wings, not at all familiar.

  • Mongo

    What caught my eye after a very deep nostalgic sigh was the Vigi sitting just abaft the island. It has been a while, hasn’t it?

    • AW1 Tim

      Mongo,

      I always thought that the Vig was one of the coolest a/c ever designed. She looked like she was moving even when sitting on the ramp. Sweet flowing lines.

  • Flatlander

    Anybody know location?

    • Earlier Utube video of USS Kitty Hawk off Pearl Harbour for RIMPAC73 filmed from HMAS Melbourne by A4G pilot Graham Winterflood. Earlier pic of them together in Pearl would have been for RIMPAC78.

  • SSG Jeff (USAR)

    The Melbourne was basically a WWII era CVL wasn’t it?

    • @Campariman

      Not really. More like an Essex-class CV.

      • Essex: Displacement: 27,200 tons
        36,380 tons full load
        Length: 872 ft (266 m)
        Beam: 93 ft (28 m)
        Draught: 23 ft (7.0 m)

        HMAS Melbourne:
        Displacement: Standard: 15,740 long tons (17,630 short tons)
        Full load: 20,000 long tons (22,000 short tons)
        Length: 213.97 metres (702 ft) overall
        Increased by 2.43 metres (8 ft) in 1969
        Beam: 24.38 metres (80 ft)
        Draught: 7.62 metres (25 ft)

  • lotocoti

    I still remember that moment, as a two week old CMID, when I walked to the edge of the round-down, looked fo’ard and thought “Maybe not.”
    I believe the “We’ll land athwartships a CVN if one of youse Yanks will take the wire” bet was never taken up.

  • D Andrews

    Glad Paul noticed it! Tomcats!! Tomcats!!!!! VF-213 at least, dunno who the other squad is. I better go read more about F-14s so I can recognize the other outfit aboard. A little research sez VF-114.

    What type of plane is that on the round-down?

  • John

    Sorry, only thing I can see is the hulk of USS Frank E. Evans (DD-754), shorn in two abaft the forward stack on 3 June 1969. Seventy-four U.S. sailors died, including the three Sage brothers from Nibrara, Nebraska, as the forward section sank almost immediately after being hit.

    The collision was the fault of the Evans’ Officer of the deck, turning into the carrier’s path to take plane guard station instead of turning away, so no blame at all on our Aussie friends for the incident.

    Still, as a “shoe” on sister ships to the Evans, every time I hear “HMAS Melbourne” all I can see is:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:USS_Frank_E._Evans_%28DD-754%29_post_collision.jpg

  • Scott

    You can easily recognize the tails of VF-114 and 213, RVAH-7 and VA-192. Rest of the airwing was VA-195, VA-52, HS-8, VAW-122, and my sqd, VS-33. I was finishing the RAG as they were headed home, and joined them upon return. Final CV-63 cruise for CVW-11, it was the first F-14/A-6E TRAM/E-2C/S-3 cruise in WESTPAC.

    Great sea story from this port visit, that I heard later. Six days transit to Sandy Eggo means that Pearl is within PCOD. One of your intrepid aviators didn’t let that deter him, and two days out he is suffering from NSU. Fighter Doc says that isn’t anything that 3,000 units can’t pound into submission, but warns he will be communicable for about three days after return. LT Intrepid notes that Mrs. Intrepid will have certain expectations upon his return to the hearth, and asks Doc for his advice. Doc says, well, I’m not the chaplain, but I know from examining you that you are uncircumcised. That surgery could give you a few days cover. The sinner says, nnnnaaaaahhhh. Doc says, then you better go to your stateroom and work on your story.

    Thirty minutes later he is cornering Doc in the dirty shirt and asking him when they could do it.

  • ozwitch

    Many folks might not know that Melbourne had 5 arrester wires.
    I had the thrill of landing onboard Melbourne from a Seaking in 1980 as a midshipman. Watching the pilots trying to spot her in the ocean on a stormy day was a revelation: so tiny she looked. I imagine she looked pretty tiny for the A4 pilots all the time.

  • Sim

    Melbourne is doing just fine thanks Lex ;)

  • Dice

    I was there, on USS Kitty Hawk when that photo was taken in Pearl Harbor, on my first WESTPAC. I remember it well. That really brings back memories.

  • virgil xenophon

    Richard Sherburne/

    No “allegedly” about it. :) Knew lots of Air America civilian contract types in both Laos and RVN that flew those things. The Air America house was right across the street from the I-Corps HQ and Quang Nam FAC house in downtown DaNang. CIA Raven FACs in Laos, not so much–almost all USAF issue stuff.

    • “The Super Courier, a more powerful derivative, was used by the US Air Force from 1958 onward, and by Air America during the Vietnam War as the U-10. In USAF service, the U-10 Super Courier was used for liaison work, light cargo and supply drops, psychological warfare, forward air control, and reconnaissance.” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helio_Courier

      • virgil xenophon

        SPAZ/

        Al most ALL AF U-10s were used in RVN as “officially” the AF wasn’t IN Laos at all–thus almost all of those were flown by civilian contract side of Air America, tho a few by CIA, non-Raven FAC, “black ops” people that also flew the CIA rescue helos, etc.

eXTReMe Tracker

View My Stats