<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Good Riddance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neptunuslex.com/2009/11/10/good-riddance-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2009/11/10/good-riddance-2/</link>
	<description>The unbearable lightness of Lex. Enjoy!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:43:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: A-T-One</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2009/11/10/good-riddance-2/comment-page-1/#comment-460828</link>
		<dc:creator>A-T-One</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 00:54:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/?p=12382#comment-460828</guid>
		<description>I think they should bring back the firing squad for folks like this. Give them a taste of their own actions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think they should bring back the firing squad for folks like this. Give them a taste of their own actions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quartermaster</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2009/11/10/good-riddance-2/comment-page-1/#comment-460447</link>
		<dc:creator>Quartermaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 19:54:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/?p=12382#comment-460447</guid>
		<description>As on commentator said, &quot;PC has now killed.&quot; It has gonemuch too far, and it&#039;s time we kicked all the PC types out of the GOFO ranks, and told the left, &quot;no more.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As on commentator said, &#8220;PC has now killed.&#8221; It has gonemuch too far, and it&#8217;s time we kicked all the PC types out of the GOFO ranks, and told the left, &#8220;no more.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flightlevel69</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2009/11/10/good-riddance-2/comment-page-1/#comment-460437</link>
		<dc:creator>flightlevel69</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 18:47:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/?p=12382#comment-460437</guid>
		<description>Good riddance is right.  And now one more execution needs to take place.  But first a short commentary:  you can&#039;t be openly gay in the military, but you can apparently be openly Jihadist. Here&#039;s to hoping that when the fine Major is taken off life support and fully recovers (at the taxpayers expense), he is put on trial and executed for his war crimes at Ft. Hood.  In my 13 years I never heard of an openly gay servicemember opening fire on his fellow men (women).  It&#039;s time for a change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good riddance is right.  And now one more execution needs to take place.  But first a short commentary:  you can&#8217;t be openly gay in the military, but you can apparently be openly Jihadist. Here&#8217;s to hoping that when the fine Major is taken off life support and fully recovers (at the taxpayers expense), he is put on trial and executed for his war crimes at Ft. Hood.  In my 13 years I never heard of an openly gay servicemember opening fire on his fellow men (women).  It&#8217;s time for a change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George P</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2009/11/10/good-riddance-2/comment-page-1/#comment-460433</link>
		<dc:creator>George P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 18:31:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/?p=12382#comment-460433</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not a lawyer, so I struggle to understand why irrelevancies such as MikeD mentions are OK to use in court and testimony on previous criminal records and such are not. If we allow one, we should allow the other.

The only question should be, did he/she do it. A suspect&#039;s motivation or bad childhood or mental states don&#039;t matter a bit to the victims and are irrelevant to whether he/she broke the law.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not a lawyer, so I struggle to understand why irrelevancies such as MikeD mentions are OK to use in court and testimony on previous criminal records and such are not. If we allow one, we should allow the other.</p>
<p>The only question should be, did he/she do it. A suspect&#8217;s motivation or bad childhood or mental states don&#8217;t matter a bit to the victims and are irrelevant to whether he/she broke the law.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marianne Matthews</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2009/11/10/good-riddance-2/comment-page-1/#comment-460413</link>
		<dc:creator>Marianne Matthews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 16:02:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/?p=12382#comment-460413</guid>
		<description>Mike D ... Two abbreviations leap to mind ... SODDI [some other dude did it] and SSDD [same s**t different day].  I predict we&#039;ll see both used during Hasan&#039;s lawyer&#039;s defense of the indefensible.  As long as his case is tried in a military court, both those abbreviations won&#039;t make a darn bit of difference.

Marianne</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike D &#8230; Two abbreviations leap to mind &#8230; SODDI [some other dude did it] and SSDD [same s**t different day].  I predict we&#8217;ll see both used during Hasan&#8217;s lawyer&#8217;s defense of the indefensible.  As long as his case is tried in a military court, both those abbreviations won&#8217;t make a darn bit of difference.</p>
<p>Marianne</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marianne Matthews</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2009/11/10/good-riddance-2/comment-page-1/#comment-460412</link>
		<dc:creator>Marianne Matthews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 16:01:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/?p=12382#comment-460412</guid>
		<description>Two abbreviations leap to mind ... SODDI [some other dude did it] and SSDD [same s**t different day].  I predict we&#039;ll see both used during Hasan&#039;s lawyer&#039;s defense of the indefensible.  As long as his case is tried in a military court, both those abbreviations won&#039;t make a darn bit of difference.

Marianne</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two abbreviations leap to mind &#8230; SODDI [some other dude did it] and SSDD [same s**t different day].  I predict we&#8217;ll see both used during Hasan&#8217;s lawyer&#8217;s defense of the indefensible.  As long as his case is tried in a military court, both those abbreviations won&#8217;t make a darn bit of difference.</p>
<p>Marianne</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

