<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Good Speech</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neptunuslex.com/2009/12/01/a-good-speech/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2009/12/01/a-good-speech/</link>
	<description>The unbearable lightness of Lex. Enjoy!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 04:27:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: SCOTTtheBADGER</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2009/12/01/a-good-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-465075</link>
		<dc:creator>SCOTTtheBADGER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 10:57:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/?p=12713#comment-465075</guid>
		<description>Since TR was a Republican, he isn&#039;t counted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since TR was a Republican, he isn&#8217;t counted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MaxDamage</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2009/12/01/a-good-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-465021</link>
		<dc:creator>MaxDamage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 05:56:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/?p=12713#comment-465021</guid>
		<description>Actually, Virgil, you make a very valid point regarding the speech.  I heard the word &quot;I&quot; a lot.  One word I did not hear was &quot;victory.&quot;

I also noticed he wants the troops in soon, within the next six months.  That&#039;s a very quick push for new troops who need training, and for the logistics train to support them.  Reserve and Guard units who have already been there will likely need to make up a large portion of the initial deployment, placing them overseas much sooner than anticipated.  He wants them out in 18 months, about the time he&#039;s running for re-election.

I&#039;m not a general nor do I pretend to be a strategic thinker in this matters, but I&#039;m seeing troop movements based upon election campaigns rather than fighting and winning wars.  As for the troops themselves, their training and rotation needs do not seem to have been considered.

Boil it all down, he&#039;s setting the stage to win an election and lose a war shortly afterwords.

  - Max</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, Virgil, you make a very valid point regarding the speech.  I heard the word &#8220;I&#8221; a lot.  One word I did not hear was &#8220;victory.&#8221;</p>
<p>I also noticed he wants the troops in soon, within the next six months.  That&#8217;s a very quick push for new troops who need training, and for the logistics train to support them.  Reserve and Guard units who have already been there will likely need to make up a large portion of the initial deployment, placing them overseas much sooner than anticipated.  He wants them out in 18 months, about the time he&#8217;s running for re-election.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not a general nor do I pretend to be a strategic thinker in this matters, but I&#8217;m seeing troop movements based upon election campaigns rather than fighting and winning wars.  As for the troops themselves, their training and rotation needs do not seem to have been considered.</p>
<p>Boil it all down, he&#8217;s setting the stage to win an election and lose a war shortly afterwords.</p>
<p>  &#8211; Max</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ProwlerAMDO</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2009/12/01/a-good-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-464994</link>
		<dc:creator>ProwlerAMDO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 03:46:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/?p=12713#comment-464994</guid>
		<description>While I&#039;m at it . . . wasn&#039;t even close.  And the sad thing is that I&#039;m NOT drunk right now.  Yikes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I&#8217;m at it . . . wasn&#8217;t even close.  And the sad thing is that I&#8217;m NOT drunk right now.  Yikes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ProwlerAMDO</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2009/12/01/a-good-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-464989</link>
		<dc:creator>ProwlerAMDO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 03:41:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/?p=12713#comment-464989</guid>
		<description>Well, why am at it disappointing people on this topic I have two more good things I&#039;ve discovered in his speech, something I think we actually talked about a couple months back. 

1.) He didn&#039;t say anywhere in the speech &quot;now is the time . . .&quot;  . . . Not that I heard at least. 
2.) No reference to the fierce urgency of now. 

Oh, no wait.  There actually IS a fierce urgency in this case unlike health care or global warming.  

So, OK, just one more thing I liked.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, why am at it disappointing people on this topic I have two more good things I&#8217;ve discovered in his speech, something I think we actually talked about a couple months back. </p>
<p>1.) He didn&#8217;t say anywhere in the speech &#8220;now is the time . . .&#8221;  . . . Not that I heard at least.<br />
2.) No reference to the fierce urgency of now. </p>
<p>Oh, no wait.  There actually IS a fierce urgency in this case unlike health care or global warming.  </p>
<p>So, OK, just one more thing I liked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ProwlerAMDO</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2009/12/01/a-good-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-464984</link>
		<dc:creator>ProwlerAMDO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 03:38:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/?p=12713#comment-464984</guid>
		<description>Hey Guys

I agree with everything you say about slavery, I&#039;m just saying that I don&#039;t think there&#039;s really anywhere to go with it.   It also &quot;tactically&quot; opens yourself up to the racism card in a manner the public would agree with and would thus let the left shut down everything you say on any topic.  I know this is a Catch-22 but think this is the reality we currently live in.  Like most things that can be understood by the public at large slavey has been stereotyped to a ridiculous degree as your links make painfully clear.  But the overall result of the stereotyping, that slavery was an abomination, is generally truthful and I guess I find the negative consequences to be tolerable (not approvable) on balance.  (Allowance provided for race baiters trying to fan the flames of white guilt and drive for reparations being admittedly a significant problem.)  

Overall I&#039;d rather pick my battles.  The leftist stereotypings of Vietnam which are now the accepted storyline for example go to the point of not only being false in their conclusions but producing a massive reduction in the ability of the nation to get on the same page with the military in fights like Iraq and Afghanistan.  They are thus something both wrong and dangerous and I would rather spend my time railing against those such problems.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Guys</p>
<p>I agree with everything you say about slavery, I&#8217;m just saying that I don&#8217;t think there&#8217;s really anywhere to go with it.   It also &#8220;tactically&#8221; opens yourself up to the racism card in a manner the public would agree with and would thus let the left shut down everything you say on any topic.  I know this is a Catch-22 but think this is the reality we currently live in.  Like most things that can be understood by the public at large slavey has been stereotyped to a ridiculous degree as your links make painfully clear.  But the overall result of the stereotyping, that slavery was an abomination, is generally truthful and I guess I find the negative consequences to be tolerable (not approvable) on balance.  (Allowance provided for race baiters trying to fan the flames of white guilt and drive for reparations being admittedly a significant problem.)  </p>
<p>Overall I&#8217;d rather pick my battles.  The leftist stereotypings of Vietnam which are now the accepted storyline for example go to the point of not only being false in their conclusions but producing a massive reduction in the ability of the nation to get on the same page with the military in fights like Iraq and Afghanistan.  They are thus something both wrong and dangerous and I would rather spend my time railing against those such problems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dust</title>
		<link>http://www.neptunuslex.com/2009/12/01/a-good-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-464939</link>
		<dc:creator>Dust</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 00:29:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neptunuslex.com/?p=12713#comment-464939</guid>
		<description>Not everyone in Vermont is a liberal @$$#ole Scott. There are at least 1000 of us who are conservatives. What positions are you looking for? VTANG is on the list of potentials for the F35. However, I will tell you that Lipstick 6 and I may be considering the Texas hill country when I stack arms permanently in 6 years to be near our SNO and his family in Austin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not everyone in Vermont is a liberal @$$#ole Scott. There are at least 1000 of us who are conservatives. What positions are you looking for? VTANG is on the list of potentials for the F35. However, I will tell you that Lipstick 6 and I may be considering the Texas hill country when I stack arms permanently in 6 years to be near our SNO and his family in Austin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

