Hot Mic

Omakase

Amazon Search

Typhoon

Courtesy of occasional reader redc1c4, an English Russia photo essay of a Soviet era Typhoon-class ballistic missile submarine. Menacing hull, impressive crew and operations spaces.

Parlous condition of the valves and gear between the pressure hulls.

Still, at a length of nearly two football fields and 20,000+ tons displacement, that’s a damn big boat.

Back in the Cold War days, we in the skimmer carrier Navy didn’t worry much about Admiral Gorshkov’s blue water fleet, no matter how menacing their physical appearance might have been.

We used to worry quite a bit about their subs though.

Share

25 comments to Typhoon

  • steve osc ret

    Bet the former COB would not be happy with all of that corrosion.

  • Mongo

    One would hope, not so much for our sake but the sake of the Ivan crews, that those boats get scrapped one day soon. I can only imagine the enormous and meticulous overhaul it would take to make either of those hulls seaworthy, and knowing just how meticulous Ivan is NOT it would sadden me to see any crew take those boats back to sea. Death coffins just waiting to bury someone.

    I’ve read reports of Ex-Soviet submarines being allowed to sink pierside for lack of crew and funding to keep them operational, a number of those hulls being nukes. Talk about an ecological disaster in the making.

    Great photo essay, btw. I’ve seen one similar, but this is a more expansive tour of the boat.

    • Quartermaster

      Commander ‘Mander had a link in one of hisposts several months ago with a nuber of pics showing a bunch of Soviet navy ships in very bad shape. Some on their sides in shallow water.

      I can remember all the Soviet Seapower propaganda the Navy used to put out for our internal consumption. My reserve unit watched a bunch of it. Even thought they were the enemy (contra Curtis LeMay) it is a bit depressing seeing so much seagoing steel turning into cancerous corrosion.

  • SCOTTtheBADGER

    I, too was appalled by the condition of the boat. Rust, rust, rust. I liked the cat though, didn’t know the Russians had cats.

    • Chris

      After seeing the images of the hull, I was thinking the interior spaces would also be in very poor condition – however I was surprised to see that the interior did not seem to be so bad. Probably only a partial crew assigned to the sub?

  • G-man

    More rust in that there one boat than in the entire US sub fleet. Makes one realize that a Mk-46 wasn’t going to do much more than antagonize the beast.

  • Mark T

    *sigh* if only a dirty paper skimmer puke sonarman like me could have seen things like this 20 years ago…
    Still very cool, and the rust isn’t much different than what we had in our knox-can FF’s of the mid 80′s. Fair amount of maintenance req’d for anything made of steel sitting in Salt water, physics and all that.

  • dc

    Can any of my fellow FAW’s comment on the number of peaks in a “Pin Banger” for one of these?

    • virgil xenophon

      dc cat-man: Please translate for this poor geezer ex-USAF bus-driver. Or if it was “Ping” Banger, I think I know what you’re talking about. Otherwise…

      • dc

        A pin banger was the description of a pen on paper going from edge to edge smoothly and rapidly.

        That’s all I know about that sort of thing…

  • CitadelGrad

    Sure doesn’t look like the same boat we saw in The Hunt For Red October…

    Methinks that they used that movie as a tool to boost military funding, showing the superiority of Russian submarines… you know. The Vast Right Wing / Iron Triangle Conspiracy. Those bastards.

    Still, great essay.

    -CG

  • Thomas

    The Russian Navy has a different perspective on rust; they make their hulls thicker and let them corrode. As the thickness or depth of the corrosion increases ion transport gets harder and the rate of corrosion goes down, approaching nothing; unless you do something silly, like needle gun the corrosion product off allowing a fresh start, the hulls will last.

    • CitadelGrad

      In which case, Thomas, they do not efficiently engineer their vessels from the start. At the same time the ion flow finishes the rusting in their steel and titanium hulls, there would already be so much gamma ray bombardment in their hulls to make her a cobalt anchor and hence make her even weaker.

      The idea of “if it rusts faster and we do nothing about it, it can only rust so much” is inherently flawed. But then again, who am I, an electrical/nuclear engineer, to argue with their Rust-osophy.

  • SCOTTtheBADGER

    So maybe a MK46 would do the job just fine, after all?

  • Phalanx08

    Sweet photos. If anyone ever finds any photos of a ship with the (Cyrillic) letters CCB-33 please post a link. She (Or he, in Russkiy) is kind of an ugly vessel but has (had?) a signifigant electronics fit.

    Sad to see so much industrial and technological output just wasting away.

    regards,

    Phalanx08

  • pdxjim

    Picture of CCB-33 at this link down aways.

    http://www.snariad.ru/otherships/otherships_ural/

  • Phalanx08

    Spasiba, Mr. pdxjim!

    regards,

    Phalanx08

  • Spencer

    I’m reminded that I would never have made it as a spook nor the desire to try.

  • CitadelGrad

    Haha, yeah, ScottTheBadger,

    A mk46 would do just fine. Although, I was once told by a Gunners Mate that a well placed .50 cal could take out a Ticonderoga Cruiser…. Who knows, none of this stuff has ever been “battle tested”, if you will.

    Unless you count .

  • CitadelGrad

    That hyperlink is Operation Praying Mantis.

    Damn A href

  • Someone with a DeLorean could make a few hundred million dollars, selling those pictures to the Navy, 20 years ago.

    People would kill for pictures like those, and unfortunelly I believe a lot of people died trying to take such pictures.

eXTReMe Tracker

View My Stats