The F-35B VSTOL variant made its first landing aboard ship yesterday, right on schedule.
Not exactly an elegant bugger with all that clabber hanging in the breeze, but 5th Gen has finally made it to sea.
Quoting the press release:
F-35B Completes Successful Initial Shipboard Vertical Landing Aboard USS WASP
By Joint Strike Fighter Program Office Public AffairsABOARD USS WASP, At sea – The Navy and Marine Corps Team made more remarkable naval aviation history today as the F-35B Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) test aircraft BF-2 landed safely on USS Wasp’s (LHD-1) flight deck, the first at sea vertical landing for the Marine Corps’ F-35 JSF version.
Marine Corps test pilot Lt. Col. Fred Schenk landed BF-2 at 3:12 pm.
“It was exactly like we predicted,” said Schenk. “But that’s because of all the hard work and extensive preparation done by the Wasp and JSF team.”
The first vertical landing is part of the initial ship trials for the F-35B which started Monday and is expected to last two-weeks. The tests are scheduled to collect data on the aircraft’s ability to perform short take-offs and vertical landings on a ship at sea, as well as determine how the aircraft integrates with the ship’s landing systems, and deck and hangar operations.
This test period, the first of three scheduled at-sea test periods over the course of the development program, will also collect environmental data on the deck through added instrumentation to measure the F-35B’s impact to flight deck operations.
“The first at sea vertical landing is a huge milestone,” said Marine Corps Col. Roger Cordell, military site director for F-35 test and evaluation at Naval Air Station Patuxent River. “We’re still early in this test period, and we expect to learn a lot more, but this is a great step toward delivering the capability to the fleet.”
Wasp spent time in a shipyard earlier this year, preparing for the F-35 test period; adding specialized instrumentation to measure deck environmental effects. (ed. I bet. Wait for the take-off.)
“It is no small feat to put together sea trials,” said Vice Admiral David Venlet, F-35 Program Executive Officer. “This test was planned to happen on 3 October back in early spring of this year and the team delivered on schedule. Signs of dependable performance are emerging across broad aspects of the development program. Professionals from the Navy, Marine Corps and industry team of Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, BAE Systems and Pratt and Whitney and Rolls Royce continue to work tirelessly to deliver this aircraft to the fleet.”
“Every time an aircraft is first tested at sea we learn a great deal and the data collected from this event will inform us about the further development work necessary to successfully integrate the F-35B on large-deck amphibious ships. By all accounts, we’re off to a great start today,” Venlet said.
The F-35B is the variant of the Joint Strike Fighter for the U.S. Marine Corps, capable of short take-offs and vertical landings for use on amphibious ships or expeditionary airfields to provide air power to the Marine Air-Ground Task Force. The F-35B will replace Marine AV-8B Harriers and F-18 Hornets and is undergoing test and evaluation at NAS Patuxent River prior to delivery to the fleet.
In addition to being the first ship to successfully land the F-35B, USS Wasp was also the first ship to host the V-22 Osprey during shipboard trials in October 2007.
Summary information regarding the performance of the F-35B ship trials will be made available after the completion of the test period.
Additional information about the Joint Strike Fighter Program can be found at www.jsf.mil.



Harriers seem to kick up less spray coming in…takeoff will be interesting.
Harrier landing – http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-kDb99ftPlY&feature=related
Love the way that Harrier sort of sidles in to the air above the bare spot on the deck, and then smoothly settles down like a hen on her nest. Why can’t the Osprey do it that smoothly?
Marianne
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l6oZsxJ6wtc&feature=related
After watching those V-22s land, I’m guessing it has something to do with having difficulty balancing the aircraft with one engine being over the deck and the other sticking off the side.
Replace the non-skid how often after it is thermo blasted away by the F-35? Might want to use some of that stuff they put on the bombs to reduce heat transfer.
Thermion will be useful – not sure if applied to USS Wasp yet (PDF pp14-6): http://www.nstcenter.com/docs/PDFs/MR2010/Tuesday-1-Presentations/11-Lemieux.pdf
“…DellaVedova says that no special matting or coatings have been put down for the F-35B’s shipboard trials. The only items added to the deck are sensors that are used to collect test data, he says.” http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/blogs/defense/index.jsp?plckController=Blog&plckBlogPage=BlogViewPost&newspaperUserId=27ec4a53-dcc8-42d0-bd3a-01329aef79a7&plckPostId=Blog%3a27ec4a53-dcc8-42d0-bd3a-01329aef79a7Post%3ad957b620-82bf-4b0c-aa36-c440b0703b94&plckScript=blogScript&plckElementId=blogDest
http://www.defensenews.com/story.php?i=8131660&c=AME&s=TOP
“…Concerns about the jet blast from the F-35B’s power engine damaging the assault ships’ flight decks have proved unfounded, Amos said. Thus far, the analysis is showing “shockingly negligible” impact on the ship’s deck, he said.”
…and we have video of STO trials
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V6r_4UM6Eso
Based on the attitude at take off, I’m wondering about the potential of deck strikes with the engine nozzle.
Considering how much stink was raised with respect to both the Abrams and the Bradley during their development, it would be funny if the Lightning II turned out to be a solid performer…