Omakase

Amazon Search

Second Order Effects

The tribulations of the F-35 program in the current fiscal environment is shaking the investment plans of an old ally: The UK’s National Audit Office reveals that the only reasons government preserved two aircraft carriers in “extended availability” were to preserve “diplomatic and commercial sensitivities”.

If DoD cancels the F-35C in favor of more Super Hornet acquisitions, or reduces the scope of the buy – increasing unit costs – the Brits will have two lovely flattops with no aircraft to fly off of them. For pretty much ever.

 

 

Share

10 comments to Second Order Effects

  • Mike M. (of the UAVs)

    I beg to differ, Lex. If the Brits were buying F-35B there would be an argument…but they have switched to the CTOL F-35C.

    Which means that they could substitute E/F or Rafale M for it in a heartbeat.

  • SK1

    Brits are pragmatic and will go with what they know.

    If the new $300 MIL per whiz-bangety plane is a scratch, they can fall back to some of their older planes. It won’t be like having a brand new one to fly but will still allow them planes for the new carriers.

    The E-type Jag is 50 years old and still a champ. Brits are made of tough stuff. I wish them well as regrdless of what the Fool in the White House thinks, they are our best friends and allies. Always.

    • Hogday

      Excellent analogy SK1 – my old MGB GT, however, would only ever be my fallback `weapon of second choice` (or more likely fourth). As for your concluding comments, my Dad always used to say to me, when talking of a United Europe with France as the one in the Chair, “The French would sell brimstone to the devil”.

  • virgil xenophon

    Napoleon was a big critic of “coalition” warfare for just these reasons. Much the same could be said for us depending on our NATO allies for the lions share of ASW & mine-laying/sweeping capability–which made some sense in the European waters NATO context but does nothing for helping out with our now atrophied-to-non-existent capabilities in these areas world-wide..

  • Spencer

    Dont you mean France’s new carriers? Or will it be Brazil? Or Argentina? Hmmmmm.

  • Trapper

    Still think we ought to offer GW to the Brits when she comes due for her potentially cancelled refueling overhaul. For $3-4B, the Brits would get a 25-30yr, up-to-date supercarrier capable of handling everything the US flies, including the E/F/G and E-2D. The US gets a force multiplier still on active service with reliable ally and also gets to forego the $2B it will cost to defuel and lay her up. It would certainly be ironic if they took the deal. Wonder if they’d change the name?

    • Hogday

      Nice deal Trapper. I’d go for that. an FDR Lend-Lease in reverse, sort of. All we’d have to do is widen the entrance to Portsmouth harbour to get that big bus in. (Every other US flat top had to moor in The Solent and ship the liberty crews ashore to the awaiting..er.. delights of that city). I’d love to see that. As for the name…just drop the George, `Washington` is a town in the North East

eXTReMe Tracker

View My Stats