Hot Mic

Omakase

Amazon Search

An Inauspicious Start

On this day in US naval history, the continental congress authorized the construction of thirteen frigates to guard the rebellion’s commerce and wage war upon British trading ships. Whether the number itself was unlucky, or whether we bit off more than we could chew against Nelson’s fleet, the effort was in vain. Only eight of the ships ordered made it to sea, and all of them were either captured or sunk. The rest were either scuttled or burnt to prevent their capture.

We were a little more successful on the second bout.

Share

18 comments to An Inauspicious Start

  • Quartermaster

    Even the Six Frigates had a hard road. At least two of them captured by the British. Constitution and Constellation served well, however.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eGTsVUSiM1g

    • Quartermaster

      I was a bit rushed on that and didn’t get to finish. But, now that I’m back, I can’t remember what I wanetd to say. So, I’ll just leave it as it stands.

  • Snake Eater

    …the Constitution…a must see on everyone’s bucket list. Best

    • SK1

      Snake…..I sailed her as a member of the 1997 crew…..first time she sailed free in over 116 years….rode her mainmast in & out of Boston and Marblehead Harbor…..It was a once-in-a-lifetime experience for all of us on the crew. Boston’s Victorious Lady 42 wins, no losses.

      • Snake Eater

        SK1…it was the right time and you were in the right place…good for you…

        …correct me here if I’m wrong…but I recall that the old girl was towed during that 1997 “sail”… she not being physically up to the stress actually sailing…no matter she was then and still is an awe inspiring misty-eyed sight to behold. Best

        • SK1

          Snake,

          We were tethered to the tug but USS Constitution moved under her own sails….the line between the escort tug was slack….she sails wonderfully as they invested 13 million in repair from 1995-1997…they measured her and she didn’t hog an inch…Bravo Zulu.

  • Joe in N Calif

    I think this is an illustration of “Timing is everything.”

  • RonF

    Those opposed to a navy felt that payment of tribute to the Barbary States and economic sanctions against Britain were a better alternative.

    Didn’t work then. Doesn’t work now. Some people never learn.

    Despite this, Washington accepted and approved the plans the same day they were submitted, 15 April 1794.

    This was back in the day when the concept was that it was the job of a head executive to make decisions.

    Secretary Knox suggested to President Washington that six different construction sites be used, one for each ship, rather than building at one particular shipyard. Separate locations enabled the alloted funds to stimulate each local economy,

    And local political fortunes, no doubt.

    The earlier predictions of Henry Knox regarding costs of the frigates came to a head in early 1797. Of the original appropriation of $688,888.82, only about $24,000 remained. Secretary of War James McHenry requested of Congress an additional $200,000, but only $172,000 was appropriated. The additional funds were enough to finish the three frigates’ construction, but did not allow them to be manned and put to sea. … Secretary McHenry reported that an additional $200,000 would be required for this stage of construction, touching off grumbling in Congress over the escalating costs. … When the next session of Congress convened in November, Secretary McHenry again requested funds to complete the three frigates. Though upset over the escalating costs, Congress approved an additional $115,833, but simultaneously launched an investigation into possible waste or fraud in the frigate program. On 22 March 1798, McHenry turned over a report outlining several main reasons for cost escalations: problems procuring the live oak; the logistics of supplying six separate shipyards; and fires, yellow fever, and bad weather.[54] Additional inquiries prior to McHenry’s report revealed that the War Department used substandard bookkeeping practices, and that the authorized funds had to be released by the Treasury Department, resulting in delays, causing waste.

    Truly there is nothing new under the sun.

    The description of the armament and gunnery practices on these ships in the Wiki entry brings to mind my last tour of the Constitution. The first few sentences out of the mouth of the Navy seaman giving the tour made it obvious that he had been born within 20 miles of the ship. In fact, it turned out he was from South Boston, which put him having been born within about 2 miles of the ship. We were examining the guns when I saw that an broadhead arrowhead was cast near the rear of the gun, pointing towards the muzzle. “What is this for?”, I asked.

    “Are there any Marines present?” our guide asked.

    No one answered, so he continued. “Well, there’s two reasons for that. The first is that the guns were produced in Britain. The arrowhead shows that the gun had been produced for export. If your ship was captured and the guns did not have that arrowhead on them you’d be prosecuted for theft.”

    What’s the second reason?

    “If the gunners’ mates were all killed and the Marines had to take over the guns, the arrowhead told them which end of the gun to point at the enemy.”

    I’m thinking that’s one very old joke. Good thing my Dad wasn’t there to hear it.

    • Quartermaster

      That’s a very old joke.

      • Snake Eater

        …an old but very good joke…and in this case unfortunately there’s a large grain of truth in it. Best

        • Quartermaster

          I had a friend when I was at OHDOT back in the 90s. He was retired from the Air Farce, but did his first hitch in the Marines. He was sent to a rifle company in Vietnam and was immediately made company clerk as he was the only junior enlisted that could read proficiently.

          A friend at chruch was a Marine Captain at that same period, and he confirmed that situation was not uncommon.

    • John

      Great humor, but the Broad Arrow was the mark applied to mark items as British military property.

    • Zane

      I have to throw a flag on this story.

      If he was truly from South Boston, you couldn’t have understood a word he said.

  • Busbob

    And why did we build them? Libya. Tripoli. Hostages. Muslims. Same old crap, different century. Some things never change, and we never learn.

  • avejoe1

    I’ve been fortunate to have received the grand tour of both the Constitution and Constellation, even stood on the keel of both. Not much to write home about, being in the bilge, but interesting to see the construction techniques. As was previously noted, defiantly should be the bucket list of anyone remotely interested in American history. If you haven’t seen them, I would go to Baltimore first. If you tour the Constitution first, the Constellation pails in comparison. It doesn’t get the same funding unfortunately.

    • SK1

      Let’s set the record straight – USS CONSTITUTION is the sole ORIGINAL Frigate – Oldest Commisioned War Vessel in the world.

      USS Constellation is not – It is a recreation built in the late 1800s. The original ship was lost.

      They may look alike but there is no comparison…USS CONSTITUTION is the Flagship of our Navy, undefeated in Battle…Baltimore has a nice ship, but that is about it.

      • avejoe1

        I didn’t mean to slight “Old Ironsides” in the least, she is a beautiful testimate to the United States and the Navy. I was not aware she is still THE flagship. As far as the record goes, I believe HMS Victory is the oldest commissioned war vessel in the world, but shes been laid up in dry dock for decades.

        • SK1

          Joe – I appreciate you were not slighting the old girl…no worries.

          HMS Victory is older but not active, just a museum piece. USS Constitution is still active and part of our fleet. I love that old Girl.

eXTReMe Tracker

View My Stats