Omakase

Amazon Search

Sympathy for the Devil

The NYT has some for disgraced ex-Marine – I use that term advisedly – and Iraq “expert” Scott Ritter. Who also, as it turns out, is a very bad man.

This isn’t a matter of white and black making gray. An apple that is only rotten on one half is a rotten apple.

Share

10 comments to Sympathy for the Devil

  • Bronco75

    The NYT has to be sympathetic toward him, since he gave them so much fodder.

  • fliterman

    I am repulsed by Ritter’s actions and his subsequent arrogance, but not so much the NYT’s reporting of it. It is enlightening. I was not aware.

    Nevertheless, the human condition is often a complex series of strange and inexplicable paradoxes. One may be a superb example of humanity in one area, and a cretin or felon in another, sometimes simultaneously.

    Ritter negated whatever he had done earlier. I am reminded of Vietnam Ace Cunningham, whose aerial accomplishments were unparalleled at the time, as also were his later criminal activities unparalleled for a Congressman later.

    As the old bridge engineer’s saying goes: You may build a 1,000 bridges, but……..

    • Zane

      flit, I expect no mercy for Ritter in this house. If I were a resident of that small town, I’d be furious that 20% of my police force is jacking around on the computer pretending to catch pedophiles. I am certain he feels himself morally superior and a savior of innocence while gazing longingly at other men’s packages online, but he’d have done better to get out in the town and find a tire that needed changing.

      None of this has any bearing whatsoever on his credibility regarding Iraq WMD. And vice versa, nothing of what he’s said regarding Iraqi WMD bears on his troublesome sexual predilections. Separate demons. But at least it’s clear that Bushitler didn’t set him up, he did it to himself.

      And as for Cunningham, I don’t think his graft was at all unparalleled, only his conviction for it.

  • Sarge

    Beauty is skin-deep, but shitbag goes to the core.

    From the article:
    “He understands the Arab world in a way that few Westerners I know do. You have no idea how smart he is.”

    Well, he for sure seems to share some of that culture’s provclivities, at any rate. But that ‘how smart he is’ comment doesn’t seem to wear well in the face of facts.

    Funny; none of the online bio’s about him seem to mention the conditions of his separation from the Corps.

    Not mentioned in the article (at least as far as I read it before becoming bilious), but prominent in his write-up on wikipedia – - this was apparntly his THIRD arrest for online creepage with putative prepubescents.

    Arrests and conviction
    Ritter was detained in April 2001[34] and arrested in June 2001[35][36] in connection with police stings in which officers posed as under-aged girls to arrange meetings of a sexual nature. The first incident did not lead to any charges.[34] He was charged with a misdemeanor crime of “attempted endangerment of the welfare of a child” after the second, but charges were dropped after he completed six months of probation[37] and the record was sealed on condition that he avoid further trouble for a period of time.[34][38] Ritter said that the timing of the leak was politically motivated.[35][36][39]

    Ritter was arrested again in November 2009[40] over communications with a police decoy he met on an Internet chat site. Police said that he exposed himself via a web camera after the officer said she was a 15-year-old girl; Ritter said he was not made aware of the ostensible age of his correspondent before the act. The next month, Ritter waived his right to a preliminary hearing and was released on a $25,000 unsecured bail. Charges included “unlawful contact with a minor, criminal use of a communications facility, corruption of minors, indecent exposure, possessing instruments of crime, criminal attempt and criminal solicitation”.[41] Ritter was found guilty of all but one count against him in a Monroe County, Pennsylvania courtroom on April 14, 2011.[1][1]

  • Padre Harvey

    Yeah, I have no problem with using the “ex-Marine” epithet on this guy.

    Here’s a couple of the quotes that stood out to me:
    “But if we’re just going to get into the realm of reality,” Ritter went on, “how much worse do you want it? We’re bankrupt, morally and fiscally, because of this war. The United States is the laughingstock of the world.” Yeah, Scott – you’d know about being morally bankrupt, right? I mean, who better to stand on their soapbox and proclaim their moral superiority than someone who… well, you get the idea.

    What really agonizes Ritter is that Americans seem to care about his forays into chat rooms, or about Michael Jackson’s doctor or the Kardashians’ wedding, but not about the moral crisis that Iraq unleashed on the land. They keep talking to Scott Ritter about justice for what he has done, and yet no one is paying for the larger crimes he believes were perpetrated against the society. That’s because it shifts the focus from what Scott Ritter has done to society at large or government as a whole. This is where his appalling arrogance really shines – when he can be so OUTRAGED!!1! at the “moral crisis” of America and demand that it all be thrust into the open, yet claim in the same breath that engaging in explicit sexual acts in front of a supposed 15-yr old is solely a private matter between him and his wife.

  • Sarge

    The definition of sociopath comes resoundingly to mind, when reading those quotes.

    He’s ‘gone native,’ and along the way is offering solid proof of the basic incompatibility of Western and Islamic society.

    In Islam, his acts are not immoral but those of the US are, seeing as any attack on an Islamic regime by unbelievers, even if defensively, is profoundly immoral within Islam.

  • mojo

    Repulsive little git, ain’t he?

  • A sex offender preying upon minors….I am surprised the article did not complement him for driving slowly through school zones.

  • Brian R

    The guy sounds like a clinical paranoid. All this stuff isn’t his fault, it’s that a morally bankrupt system is out to get him!!11!

    The contention that he was right about Iraq is just ludicrous. He said there weren’t WMDs, then he said there were. One of those assertions was bound to be correct. What an amazing genius!

  • RJL

    When the first allegations of Ritter’s, er, legal issues came to light, I felt certain that he had been compromised by a hostile security service sometime during his inspection tour — nothing else seemed to explain the severe (and very vocal) turnaround in his stance on the WMD issue. After reading this interview, I’m not so sure. A very odd man.

eXTReMe Tracker

View My Stats